Refining the experimental analysis of academic skills deficits: Part II. Use of brief experimental analysis to evaluate reading fluency treatments

Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis

Volumn 39, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 323-331

  Daly III, Edward J ^a   Bonfiglio, Christine M ^b   Mattson, Tara ^a   Persampieri, Michael ^a   Foreman Yates, Kristin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

^b Elkhart Community Schools ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Academic performance; Experimental analysis; Generalization; Reading fluency

Indexed keywords

ACHIEVEMENT; ARTICLE; CHILD; DYSLEXIA; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MOTIVATION; OBSERVER VARIATION; TEACHING; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ACHIEVEMENT; CHILD; DYSLEXIA; FEMALE; GENERALIZATION (PSYCHOLOGY); HUMANS; MALE; MOTIVATION; OBSERVER VARIATION; TEACHING; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33748941446     PISSN: 00218855     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1901/jaba.2006.13-05     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Barnett, D. W., Daly, E. J., III, Jones, K. M., & Lentz, F. E., Jr. (2004). Empirically based special service decisions from increasing and decreasing intensity single case designs. Journal of Special Education, 38, 66-79.
2. Daly, E. J., III, Bonfiglio, C. M., Mattson, T., Persampieri, M., & Foreman-Yates, K. (2005). Refining the experimental analysis of academic skills deficits: Part I. An investigation of variables that affect generalized oral reading performance, Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 38, 485-498.
3. Daly, E. J., III, & Martens, B. K. (1994). A comparison of three interventions for increasing oral reading performance: Application of the instructional hierarchy. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 459-469.
4. Daly, E. J., III, Martens, B. K., Dool, E. J., & Hintze, J. M. (1998). Using brief functional analysis to select interventions for oral reading. Journal of Behavioral Education, 8, 203-218.
5. Daly, E. J., III, Martens, B. K., Hamler, K. R., Dool, E. J., & Eckert, T. L. (1999). A brief experimental analysis for identifying instructional components needed to improve oral reading fluency. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32, 83-94.
6. Daly, E. J., III, Martens, B. K., Kilmer, A., & Massie, D. (1996). The effects of instructional match and content overlap on generalized reading performance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 507-518.
7. Daly, E. J., III, Murdoch, A., Lillenstein, L., Webber, L., & Lentz, F. E. (2002). An examination of methods for testing treatments: Conducting experimental analyses of the effects of instructional components on oral reading fluency. Education and Treatment of Children, 25, 288-316.
8. Eckert, T. L., Ardoin, S. P., Daisey, D. M., & Scarola, M. D. (2000). Empirically evaluating the effectiveness of reading interventions: The use of brief experimental analysis and single-case designs. Psychology in the Schools, 37, 463-474.
9. Eckert, T. L., Ardoin, S. P., Daly, E. J., III, & Martens, B. K. (2002). Improving oral reading fluency: An examination of the efficacy of combining skill-based and performance-based interventions. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 35, 271-281.
10. Gersten, R., & Baker, S. (2003). English-language learners with learning disabilities. In H. L. Swanson, K. R. Harris, & S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 94-109). New York: Guilford.
11. Hendrickson, J. M., Gable, R. A., Novak, C., & Peck, S. (1996). Functional assessment as strategy assessment for teaching academics. Education and Treatment of Children, 19, 257-271.
12. Jones, K. M., & Wickstrom, K. F. (2002). Done in sixty seconds: Further analysis of the brief assessment model for academic problems. School Psychology Review, 31, 554-568.
13. Martens, B. K., Eckert, T. L., Bradley, T. A., & Ardoin, S. P. (1999). Identifying effective treatments from a brief experimental analysis: Using single-case design elements to aid decision making. School Psychology Quarterly, 14, 163-181.
14. McComas, J. J., Wacker, D. P., Cooper, L. J., Asmus, J. M., Richman, D., & Stoner, B. (1996). Brief experimental analysis of stimulus prompts for accurate responding on academic tasks in an outpatient clinic. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 397-401.
15. National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Available on-line: http://www.nichd.nih.gov/publications/nrp/smallbook.htm
16. National Research Council. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
17. Noell, G. H., Freeland, J. T., Witt, J. C., & Gansle, K. A. (2001). Using brief assessments to identify effective interventions for individual students. Journal of School Psychology, 39, 335-355.
18. Noell, G. H., Gansle, K. A., Witt, J. D., Whitmarsh, E. L., Freeland, J. T., & LaFleur, L. H., et al. (1998). Effects of contingent reward and instruction on oral reading performance at differing levels of passage difficulty. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31, 659-664.
19. O'Shea, L. J., Munson, S. M., & O'Shea, D. J. (1984). Error correction in oral reading: Evaluating the effectiveness of three procedures. Education and Treatment of Children, 7, 203-214.
20. Pearson, P. D., Johnson, D. D., Clymer, T., Indirsano, R., Venezky, R. L., & Baumann, J. F., et al. (1989). Silver, Burdett, and Ginn. Needham, MA: Silver, Burdett, and Ginn, Inc.
21. Rashotte, C. A., & Torgesen, J. K. (1985). Repeated reading and reading fluency in learning disabled children. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 180-188.
22. Shapiro, E. S. (2004)-Academic skills problems: Direct assessment and intervention. (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford.
23. Shinn, M. R. (1989). Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children. New York: Guilford.
24. Shinn, M. R., Good, R. H., III, Knutson, N., & Tilly, W. D., III (1992). Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading fluency: A confirmatory analysis of its relation to reading. School Psychology Review, 21, 459-479.
25. Spache, G. (1953). A new readability formula for primary grade materials. Elementary English, 53, 410-413.
26. VanAuken, T., Chafouleas, S. M., Bradley, T. A., & Martens, B. K. (2002). Using brief experimental analysis to select oral reading interventions: An investigation of treatment utility. Journal of Behavioral Education, 11, 165-181.