Adhesion on the nano- and macroscale: Interaction between copper and SAN/SMAh copolymers

ChemPhysChem

Volumn 7, Issue 9, 2006, Pages 1912-1916

  Vukić, Jelena Božović ^a   Hoeppener, Stephanie ^a   Kozodaev, Dmitry A ^a   Kisin, Srdjan ^a   Klumperman, Bert ^a   Schubert, Ulrich S ^a   De With, Gijsbertus ^a   Koning, Cor E ^a  

^a EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Adhesion; Copper; Polymers; Scanning force spectroscopy; Surface chemistry

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATA THEORY; COPPER; METAL COATINGS; POLYMERS; SCANNING TUNNELING MICROSCOPY; STYRENE; SURFACE CHEMISTRY;

ADHESION PROPERTIES; FORCE SPECTROSCOPY; MACRO SCALE; POLY(STYRENE-CO-ACRYLONITRILE); PULL-OFF TESTS;

ADHESION;

EID: 33748932171     PISSN: 14394235     EISSN: 14397641     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cphc.200600318     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. C. Seidel, H. Kopf, B. Gotsmann, T. Vieth, H. Fuchs, K. Reihs, Appl. Surf. Sci. 1999, 150, 19.
2. G. E. Molau, J. Polym. Sci., Part B: Polym. Lett. 1965, 3, 1007.
3. G. Hadziioannou, S. Patel, S. Granick, M. Tirrell, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 2869.
4. B. H. L. T. Kato, Surf. Sci. 1993, 284, 167.
5. G. Binning, C. F. Quate, C. Gerber, Phys. Rev. Lett. 1986, 56, 930.
6. a) S. O. Vansteenkiste, S. I. Corneillie, E. H. Schacht, X. Chen, M. C. Davies, M. Moens, L. V. Vaeck, Langmuir 2000, 16, 3330, and refs. [3-7] and [10] therein;
7. b) M. Bonin, R. Zhu, Y. Klaue, J. Oberstrass, E. Oesterschulze, W. Nellen, Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30, e81.
8. a) A. Janshoff, M. Neitzert, Y. Oberdorfer, H. Fuchs, Angew. Chem. 2000, 112, 3346;
9. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 3212;
10. b) N. S. Lawson, R. H. Ion, H. M. Pollock, D. J. Hourston, M. Reading, Phys. Scr. 1994, T55, 199;
11. c) B. Cappella, S. K. Kaliappan, H. Sturm, Macromolecules 2005, 38, 1874;
12. d) R. Levy, M. Maaloum, Nanotechnology 2002, 13, 33;
13. e) X. Wang, Q. Shi, H. Hu, K. Zhang, Eur. Polym. J. 2004, 40, 2179.
14. A. L. Weisenhorn, P. Maivald, H. J. Butt, P. K. Hansma, Phys. Rev. B 1992, 45, 11 226.
15. G. J. Fleer, M. A. Cohen Stuart, J. M. H. M. Scheutjens, T. Cosgrove, B. Vincent, Polymers at Interface; Chapman & Hall, London, 1993.
16. D. E. Packham, Int. J. Adhesion and Adhesives 1996, 16, 121.
17. The tip was coated by chemical vapor deposition (CVD) of copper.
18. S. A. C. Gould, B. Drake, C. B. Prater, A. L. Weisenhorn, S. Manne, G. L. Kelderman, H.-J. Butt, H. Hansma, P. K. Hansma, S. Magonov, H. J. Cantow, Ultramicroscopy 1990, 33, 93.
19. Water is always present in the system, even after the additional drying of the polymers and the copper tip.
20. A careful analysis of the snap-in characteristic allows to conclude that the amount of water is in both sample-tip systems comparable, as the depth of the snap-in peak is the same for both samples. Therefore the influence of the meniscus forces on the observed differences is negligible in both cases.
21. J. Chiefari, Y. K. B. Chong, F. Ercole, J. Krstina, J. Jeffery, T. P. T. Le, R. T. A Mayadunne, G. F. Meijs, C. L. Moad, G. Moad, E. Rizzardo, S. H. Thang, Macromolecules 1998, 31, 5559.
22. H. d. Brouwer, M. A. J. Schellekens, B. Klumperman, M. J. Monteiro, A. L. German, J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2000, 38, 3596-3603.
23. J. Bozovic, B. Klumperman, Polym. Preprints 2005, 46, 450-451.
24. S. Wu, J. Polym. Sci., Part B: Polym. Phys. 1989, 27, 723.
25. S. Wu, Polym. Eng. Sci. 1992, 32, 823.