Agreement and Repeatability for Standard Automated Perimetry and Confocal Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopy in the Diagnostic Innovations in Glaucoma Study

American Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 142, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 381-386

  Ng, Diana ^a   Zangwill, Linda M ^a   Racette, Lyne ^a   Bowd, Christopher ^a   Pascual, John P ^a   Bourne, Rupert R A ^a   Boden, Catherine ^a   Weinreb, Robert N ^a   Sample, Pamela A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED PERIMETRY; CONFOCAL LASER MICROSCOPY; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; EYE MALFORMATION; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA; SCANNING LASER OPHTHALMOSCOPY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; LASER; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; OPHTHALMOSCOPY; OPTIC NERVE DISEASE; PERIMETRY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; REPRODUCIBILITY;

DIAGNOSTIC AGENT;

FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMANS; LASERS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OPHTHALMOSCOPY; OPTIC NERVE DISEASES; PERIMETRY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 33748876059     PISSN: 00029394     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2006.04.027     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Weinreb R.N., Kitazawa Y., and Krieglstein G.K. Glaucoma in the 21st century (2000), Mosby International, London
2. Weinreb R.N., and Khaw P.T. Primary open-angle glaucoma. Lancet 363 (2004) 1711-1720
3. Jonas J.B., and Grundler A.E. Correlation between mean visual field loss and morphometric optic disk variables in the open-angle glaucomas. Am J Ophthalmol 124 (1997) 488-497
4. Bartz-Schmidt K.U., Thumann G., Jonescu-Cuypers C.P., and Krieglstein G.K. Quantitative morphologic and functional evaluation of the optic nerve head in chronic open-angle glaucoma. Surv Ophthalmol 44 (1999) S41-S53
5. Chauhan B.C., McCormick T.A., Nicolela M.T., and LeBlanc R.P. Optic disc and visual field changes in a prospective longitudinal study of patients with glaucoma. comparison of scanning laser tomography with conventional perimetry and optic disc photography. Arch Ophthalmol 119 (2001) 1492-1499
6. Weinreb R.N., Shakiba S., Sample P.A., et al. Association between quantitative nerve fiber layer measurement and visual field loss in glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 120 (1995) 732-738
7. Iester M., Mikelberg F.S., Courtright P., and Drance S.M. Correlation between the visual field indices and Heidelberg retina tomograph parameters. J Glaucoma 6 (1997) 78-82
8. Cullinane A.B., Waldock A., Diamond J.P., and Sparrow J.M. Optic disc cup slope and visual field indices in normal, ocular hypertensive and early glaucomatous eyes. Br J Ophthalmol 86 (2002) 555-559
9. Lan Y.W., Henson D.B., and Kwartz A.J. The correlation between optic nerve head topographic measurements, peripapillary nerve fibre layer thickness, and visual field indices in glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 87 (2003) 1135-1141
10. Artes P.H., and Chauhan B.C. Longitudinal changes in the visual field and optic disc in glaucoma. Prog Retin Eye Res 24 (2005) 333-354
11. Harwerth R.S., Carter-Dawson L., Shen F., Smith III E.L., and Crawford M.L. Ganglion cell losses underlying visual field defects from experimental glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 40 (1999) 2242-2250
12. Kerrigan-Baumrind L.A., Quigley H.A., Pease M.E., Kerrigan D.F., and Mitchell R.S. Number of ganglion cells in glaucoma eyes compared with threshold visual field tests in the same persons. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41 (2000) 741-748
13. Swanson W.H., Felius J., and Pan F. Perimetric defects and ganglion cell damage. interpreting linear relations using a two-stage neural model. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45 (2004) 466-472
14. Kass M.A., Heuer D.K., Higginbotham E.J., et al. The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study. a randomized trial determines that topical ocular hypotensive medication delays or prevents the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 120 (2002) 701-713 discussion 829-830
15. Ugurlu S., Hoffman D., Garway-Heath D.F., and Caprioli J. Relationship between structural abnormalities and short-wavelength perimetric defects in eyes at risk of glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 129 (2000) 592-598
16. Miglior S., Zeyen T., Pfeiffer N., Cunha-Vaz J., Torri V., and Adamsons I. The European glaucoma prevention study design and baseline description of the participants. Ophthalmology 109 (2002) 1612-1621
17. Soliman M.A., de Jong L.A., Ismaeil A.A., van den Berg T.J., and de Smet M.D. Standard achromatic perimetry, short wavelength automated perimetry, and frequency doubling technology for detection of glaucoma damage. Ophthalmology 109 (2002) 444-454
18. Zangwill L.M., Bowd C., Berry C.C., et al. Discriminating between normal and glaucomatous eyes using the Heidelberg retina tomograph, GDx nerve fiber analyzer, and optical coherence tomograph. Arch Ophthalmol 119 (2001) 985-993
19. Sample P.A., Bosworth C.F., Blumenthal E.Z., Girkin C., and Weinreb R.N. Visual function-specific perimetry for indirect comparison of different ganglion cell populations in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41 (2000) 1783-1790
20. Spry P.G., Johnson C.A., Mansberger S.L., and Cioffi G.A. Psychophysical investigation of ganglion cell loss in early glaucoma. J Glaucoma 14 (2005) 11-19
21. Bowd C., Zangwill L.M., Berry C.C., et al. Detecting early glaucoma by assessment of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and visual function. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 42 (2001) 1993-2003
22. Kesen M.R., Spaeth G.L., Henderer J.D., Pereira M.L., Smith A.F., and Steinmann W.C. The Heidelberg retina tomograph vs clinical impression in the diagnosis of glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 133 (2002) 613-616
23. Wollstein G., Garway-Heath D.F., and Hitchings R.A. Identification of early glaucoma cases with the scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Ophthalmology 105 (1998) 1557-1563
24. Bathija R., Zangwill L., Berry C.C., Sample P.A., and Weinreb R.N. Detection of early glaucomatous structural damage with confocal scanning laser tomography. J Glaucoma 7 (1998) 121-127
25. Johnson C.A., Sample P.A., Cioffi G.A., Liebmann J.R., and Weinreb R.N. Structure and function evaluation (SAFE): I. criteria for glaucomatous visual field loss using standard automated perimetry (SAP) and short wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP). Am J Ophthalmol 134 (2002) 177-185
26. Goldbaum M.H., Sample P.A., Chan K., et al. Comparing machine learning classifiers for diagnosing glaucoma from standard automated perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43 (2002) 162-169
27. Zangwill L.M., Chan K., Bowd C., et al. Heidelberg retina tomograph measurements of the optic disc and parapapillary retina for detecting glaucoma analyzed by machine learning classifiers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45 (2004) 3144-3151
28. Bowd C., Chan K., Zangwill L.M., et al. Comparing neural networks and linear discriminant functions for glaucoma detection using confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy of the optic disc. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43 (2002) 3444-3454
29. Bowd C., Zangwill L.M., Medeiros F.A., et al. Confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy classifiers and stereophotograph evaluation for prediction of visual field abnormalities in glaucoma-suspect eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45 (2004) 2255-2262
30. Medeiros F.A., Zangwill L.M., Bowd C., and Weinreb R.N. Comparison of the GDx VCC scanning laser polarimeter, HRT II confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope, and stratus OCT optical coherence tomograph for the detection of glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 122 (2004) 827-837
31. Wollstein G., Garway-Heath D.F., Fontana L., and Hitchings R.A. Identifying early glaucomatous changes. comparison between expert clinical assessment of optic disc photographs and confocal scanning ophthalmoscopy. Ophthalmology 107 (2000) 2272-2277
32. Landis J.R., and Koch G.G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33 (1977) 159-174
33. Heijl A., Lindgren G., and Olsson J. Normal variability of static perimetric threshold values across the central visual field. Arch Ophthalmol 105 (1987) 1544-1549
34. Chauhan B.C., LeBlanc R.P., McCormick T.A., and Rogers J.B. Test-retest variability of topographic measurements with confocal scanning laser tomography in patients with glaucoma and control subjects. Am J Ophthalmol 118 (1994) 9-15
35. Heijl A., Lindgren A., and Lindgren G. Test-retest variability in glaucomatous visual fields. Am J Ophthalmol 108 (1989) 130-135
36. Chauhan B.C., and Johnson C.A. Test-retest variability of frequency-doubling perimetry and conventional perimetry in glaucoma patients and normal subjects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 40 (1999) 648-656
37. Flammer J., Drance S.M., and Zulauf M. Differential light threshold. short- and long-term fluctuation in patients with glaucoma, normal controls, and patients with suspected glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 102 (1984) 704-706
38. Keltner J.L., Johnson C.A., Quigg J.M., Cello K.E., Kass M.A., Gordon M.O., and Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study Group. Confirmation of visual field abnormalities in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study. Arch Ophthalmol 118 (2000) 1187-1194
39. Leske M.C., Heijl A., Hyman L., and Bengtsson B. Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. design and baseline data. Ophthalmology 106 (1999) 2144-2153
40. Sihota R., Gulati V., Agarwal H.C., Saxena R., Sharma A., and Pandey R.M. Variables affecting test-retest variability of Heidelberg retina tomograph II stereometric parameters. J Glaucoma 11 (2002) 321-328