Bridging the gap: Discourse in text-based foreign language classrooms

Foreign Language Annals

Volumn 35, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 437-456

  Mantero, Miguel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33748875189     PISSN: 0015718X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1944-9720.2002.tb01883.x     Document Type: Article

References (117)

1. Aljaafreh, A. & Lantolf, J.P. (1994). Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the Zone of Proximal Development. The Modem Language Journal, 78, 465-83.
2. Allwright, D. (1984). The importance of interaction in class room language learning. Applied Linguistics, 5, 165-71.
3. Akyel, A. & Yalcin, E. (1990). Literature in the EFL class: A study of goal-achievement incongruence. ELT Journal, 44,3, 174-80.
4. Anton, M. (1999). The discourse of a learner-centered class room: Sociocultural perspectives on teacher-learner interaction in the second language classroom. The Modern Language journal, 83, 303-18.
5. Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays by M. M. Bakhtin, Ed. M. Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press.
6. Bakhtin, M. M. (1984). Problems of Dostocvsky's Poetics. Minneapolis: University of Minneapolis Press.
7. Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Austin: Universtity of Texas Press.
8. Barnes, K. G. (2000). Revising a Spanish novel class in light of standards for foreign language learning. ADFL Bulletin, 31,2, 44-48.
9. Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an Ecology of Mind. New York: Ballentine.
10. Bereiter, C. (1994). Implications of postmedernism for science or science as progressive discourse. Educational Psychologist, 29,1,3-12.
11. Bernhardt, E. B. (1995). Teaching literature or teaching Students? ADFL Bulletin, 26, 2, 5-6.
12. Blackboum, B. (1986). The transition from language courses to literature: A pragmatic stance. The French Review, 60,2, 196-202.
13. Bloom, B. S (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Handbook 1, Cognitive Domain. New York: McKay.
14. Bretz, M.L. & Persin, M. (1987). A working model for the teaching of literature at the introductory level. The Modem Language Journal, 71, 165-70.
15. Brooks, F B. et al (1997). When are they going to say 'it' right? Understanding learner talk during pair-work activity. Foreign Language Annals, 30,4, 524-40.
16. Brooks, F B. & Donato, R. (1994). Vygostkian approaches to understanding foreign language learner discourse during com municative tasks. Hispania, 77, 262-73.
17. Brown, G. (1996). Language learning, competence and performance. In: Performance and Competence in Second Language Acquisition (pp. 187-203). Cambridge University Press.
18. Brown, G. & Yule, G. (1983). Discourse analysis. Cambridge University Press.
19. Carrasco, R. L. (1981). Expanding awareness of student per formance: A case study in applied ethnographic monitoring in a bilingual classroom. In H. T. Trueba, G. P. Guthrie, & K. H. Au (Eds.), Culture and the Bilingual Classroom: Studies in Classroom Ethnography (pp.153-177). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
20. Carter, R., & Long, M. (1990). Teaching literature in EFL classes: Tradition and innovation. ELT Journal, 44,3, 215-21.
21. Cazden, C. (1986) Classroom discourse. In M.C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching (pp. 432-63). New York: Macmillan.
22. Chamot, A. U. (1994). A model for learning strategies instruction in the foreign language classroom. Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics 1994. Georgetown: Georgetown Press.
23. Coulthard, M.C. (1977). An Introduction to Discourse Analysis. London: Longman.
24. Davidheiser, J. (1977). An interdisciplinary approach to the teaching of foreign literature. The Modern Language Journal, 61, 25-31.
25. Davis, J. N., et al. (1992). Readers and foreign Languages: A survey of undergraduate attitudes toward the study of literature. The Modem Language Journal, 76, 320-31.
26. Davis, J. N. (1992). Reading literature in the foreign language: The comprehension/response connection. The French Review, 63,3, 359-70.
27. Davis, J. N. (1989). The act of reading in the foreign language: Pedagogical implications of Iser's teader-Response Theory. The Modern Language Journal, 73, 420-28.
28. Deyes, A.E (1974). Speech activity in the language class. ELTJ, 28, 222-226.
29. Donato, R. (1994). Collective Scaffolding in Second Language Learning. In Lantolf and Appel, Eds., Vygotskian Approaches to Second Language Research. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 33-56.
30. Donato, R. & Adair-Hauk, B. (1992). Discourse perspectives on formal instruction. Language Awareness, 1,2, 73-89.
31. Dunn, W. E. & Lantolf, J. P. (1998). Vygotsky's Zone of Proximal Development and Krashen's i + 1: Incommensurable constructs; Incommensurable theories. Language Learning, 48, 3,411-42.
32. Elliot, R. (1990). Encouraging reader-response to literature in the ESL Situation. ELT Juornal, 44,3, 191-98.
33. Engestrom, Y. (1991). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. Activity Theory, 7/8, 6-17.
34. Fillmore, L. V. (1982). Instructional language as linguistic input: Second language learning in classrooms. In L.C. Wilkinson (Ed.), Communicating in the Classroom (pp. 283-96). New York: Academic Press.
35. Forman, E. A. & Cazden, C.B. (1985). Exploring Vygotskian perspectives in education: The cognitive value of peer interaction. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), Culture, Communication and Cognition: Vygotskian Perspectives (pp.332-47). New York: Cambridge University Press.
36. Floriani, A. (1994). Negotiating what counts: Roles and relationships, texts and contexts, content and meaning. Linguistics and Education, 5, 241-74.
37. Frye, N. (1984). Literary and linguistic scholarship in a post-literate world. PALA, 99, 990-95.
38. Gass, S. & Varonis, E. M. (1994). Input, interaction, and Second Language Production. 5SLA, 16, 283-302.
39. Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays by Clifford Geertz- New York: Basic Books.
40. Givens,.C. E (1976). A descriptive study of the cognitive level of classroom discourse of college professors and students. Unpublished dissertation. Claremont Graduate University. Claremont, CA.
41. Graden, E. C. (1996). How language teacher's beliefs about reading instruction are mediated by their beliefs about students. Foreign Language Annals, 29,3, 387-95.
42. Hall, J. K. (1999). The communication standards. In J. Phillips and R. Terry (Eds.), Foreign Language Standards: Linking Research, Theories, and Practices (pp. 15-56). New York: NTC.
43. Hall, J. K. (1997). A consideration of SLA as a theory of practice: A response to Firth and Wagner. The Modern Language Journal, 81,301-6.
44. Hall, J. K. (1995). (Re)creating our world with words: A socio-historical perspective of face-to-face interaction. Applied Linguistics, 16,2, 206-32.
45. Hall, J. K. (1995). "Aw, man, where you goin'?": Classroom interaction and the development of L2 interactional competence. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 6,2, 37-62.
46. Halliday, M. A. K. (1993). Towards a language-based theory of learning. Linguistics and Education, 5, 93-116.
47. Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social scmiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Arnold Press.
48. Halliday, M. A. K. ( 1975). Learning how to mean. London: Arnold Press.
49. Hankins, O. (1972). Literary analysis at the intermediate level The Modem Language Journal, 55,5, 291-95.
50. Harper, S. (1988). Strategies for teaching literature at the undergraduate level. The Modern Language Journal 72 iv 402-8.
51. Hester, R. (1972). From reading to the reading of literature. The Modern Language Journal, 55,5, 284-90.
52. Isenberg, N. (1990). Literary competence: The EFL reader and the role of the teacher. ELTJournal, 44,3, 181-90.
53. Iser, W. (1978). The act of reading: A theory of aesthetic response. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
54. Keenan, E., & Scheiffelen, B. (1976). Topic as discourse in notion. In C. Li & S. Thompson (Eds.): Subject and Topic. New York: Academic Press.
55. Kempf, E R. (1995).The dialectic of education: Foreign language, culture, and literature. ADFL Bulletin, 27,1, 38-46.
56. Knutson, E. (1993). Teaching whole texts: Literature and foreign language reading instruction. The French Review, 67,1, 12-27.
57. Kramsch, C. (1985). Literary texts in the classroom: A discourse model. The Modern Language Journal, 69, 356-66.
58. Kumaravadivelu, B. (1999). Critical classroom discourse Analysis. TESOL Quarterly, 33,3, 453-84.
59. Kumaravadivelu, B. (1993). Maximizing learning potential in the communicative classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 76,i, 41-49.
60. Lantolf, J. P. (2000). Socioculfural Theory and Second Language Learning. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
61. Lantolf, J. P. & Appel, G. (1996). Vygotshian Approaches to Second Language Research. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
62. Lave, J. & Wegener, E. (1991) Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
63. Lave, J. (1977). Tailor-made experiments and evaluating the Intellectual consequences of apprenticeship training. Quarterly Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition, 1, 1-3.
64. Lazar, G. (1990).Using novels in the language-learning class room. ELT Journal, 44, 3, 204-14.
65. Lemke, J. L. (1985). Using Language in the Classroom. Oxford University Press.
66. Lemke, J. L. (1990). The language of classroom science. In C. Emihovich (Ed.), Locating Learning Across the Curriculum (pp. 216-39). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
67. Leontiev, A. A. (1981). Psychology and the Language Learning Process. Oxford, U.K.: Pergamon.
68. Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
69. Lightbown, Patsy (1990). Process-product research on second language learning in classrooms. In Harley et al. (Eds.), The Development of Second Language Proficiency. Cambridge University Press (82-92).
70. Littlewood, W. T. (1980). Form and meaning in language-teaching methodology. Language Journal, 64,4, 441-5.
71. Long, M. H. & Porter, PA. (1985). Group work, interlanguage talk, and second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 19,2, 207-7.
72. Lottman, Y. M. (1988). Text within a text. Soviet Psychology, 26,3, 32-51.
73. Loureda Lamas, O. (1999). Accrca del Objeto yl os Objetivos de la Ensenanza del Area de la Lcngua y la Litcralura en la Enscnanza Secundaria Obligatoria. R1LCE, 15,2, 427-38.
74. Luria, A. R. (1981). Language and Cognition.J. V. Wertsch (Ed). New York: Wiley Publishing.
75. Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics. Cambridge University Press.
76. McCarthy, J. A (1998). W(h)ither literature? Reaping the fruit of language study before it's too late. ADFL Bulletin, 29,2, 10-36.
77. Meade, R. (1980). On teaching literature in today's world. His pania, 63, 36-39.
78. Moskowitz, G. (1976). The classroom interaction of outstanding foreign language teachers. Foreign Language Annals, 9,2, 135-57.
79. Muyskens.J. A. & Cassini.J. (1991). Literature in the foreign language: A comparative study. In Ervin, G. (Ed.), International Perspectives on Foreign Language Teaching (pp. 138-59). Lincolnwood, IL: NTC.
80. Muyskens, J. A. (1983). Teaching second language literatures: Past present and future. The Modern Language Journal, 67, 413-23.
81. Nunan, D. (1989). Designing tasks for the communcative class room. Cambridge University Press.
82. Nunan, D. (1987). Communicative language teaching: Making it work. ELT Journal, 41,2, 136-45.
83. Pica, T. (1987). Second-language acquisition, social interaction, and the classroom. Applied Linguistics, 8,1, 3-21.
84. Pica, T., & Long, M. (1986). The linguistic and conversational performance of experienced and inexperienced teachers. In R. Day, (Ed.), Talking to Leant. Rowley: Newbury House
85. Piatt, E., & Brooks, F B. (1994). The "acquisition-rich environment" revisited. The Modern Language Journal, 78,497-511.
86. Ricouer, P. (1976). Interpretation theory: Discourse and the surplus of meaning. Fort Worth, TX: Texas University Press.
87. Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. Oxford University Press.
88. Rogoff, B. & Wertsch, J.V (Eds.) (1984). Children's Learning in the Zone of Proximal Development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
89. Rosenblatt, L. M. (1938). Literature as Exploration. NewYork: Modem Language Press.
90. Santoni, G. Y (1971). Methods of teaching literature. ACTFL Annual meeting of ACTFL. November 25-28, 1971; Chicago IL.
91. Schiffrin, D. (1994). Approaches to Discourse. London: Blackwell
92. Smithson, J. L. (1995). Describing the Enacted Curriculum: Development and Dissemination of Opportunity to Learn Indicators in Science Education. Washington, DC: SCASS Science Project.
93. Spada, N. (1987). Relationships between instructional differences and learner outcomes: A process-product study of communicative language teaching. Applied Linguistics, 8,2, 137-61.
94. Steiner, F (1972). Teaching literature in the secondary schools. The Modern Language Journal, 55,5, 278-83.
95. Steiner, F (1970). Teaching literature by performance objectives. Foreign Language Annals, 3, 579-91.
96. Swaffar, J. (1998). Major changes: The standards project and the new foreign language curriculum. ADFL Bulletin, 30,1, 34-37.
97. Taylor, D. S. (1985). Teaching reading for comprehension in the context of English as a second or foreign language. British Journal of Language Teaching, 23,3, 163-68.
98. Tharp, R. G. & Gallimore, R. (1988). Rousing Minds to Life: Teaching, Learning, and Schooling in Social Context. Cambridge University Press.
99. Thomas, J. J. (1998). Is there still a place for linguistics in the foreign language and literature curriculum? ADFL Bulletin, 30,1, 25-29.
100. Tobin, K. (1997). Dialectical constraints to the discourse practices of a high school physics community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 491-507.
101. Todorov, T. (1984). Mikhail Bakhtin: The Dialogical Principal. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
102. Trueba, H.T. (1989). Raising Silent Voices: Educating the Linguistic Minority for the 21st Century. New York: Newbury House.
103. Tudge, J.(1990). Vygotsky, the zone of proximal development, and peer collaboration: Implications for classroom practice. In L. C. Moll (Ed.), Vygotsky and Education: Instmctional implications and applications of sociolustoiical psycholog (pp 155-72). Cambridge University Press,.
104. Tudor, L. (1993). Teacher roles in learner-Centered classrooms. ELTJonmaL 47,1, 22-31.
105. Vande Berg, C. K. (1993). Managing learner anxiety in literature courses. The French Review, 67,1, 27-37
106. Volosinov, V. N. (1973). Marxism and the Philosophy of Language. New York: Seminar Press.
107. Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
108. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
109. Walz, J. (1993).Context and contextualized language practice in foreign language teaching. The Modern Language Journal, 73, ii, 160-68.
110. Webb, J. N. (1970). The Florida Taxonomy of Cognitive Behavior. In Simon & Boyer (Eds.), Minors for Behaviot; an Anthology of Classroom Observation Instrulments. Philadelphia: Research for Better Schools.
111. Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic Inquiry: Toward Socio cultural Practice and Theory of Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
112. Wells, G. (1993). Reevaluating the IRF Sequence: A Proposal for the Articulation of Theories of Activity and Discourse for the Analysis of Teaching and Learning in the Classroom. Linguistics and Education, 5, 1-37.
113. Wertsch, J. V (Ed.) (1986). The Concept oj Activity in Soviet Psychology. Armonk, NY: Sharpc.
114. Wertsch, J. V. (1986). Thought and Language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
115. Wertsch, J. V ( 1991). Voices of the Mind: A Sociocultural Approach to Mediated Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
116. Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as Action. Oxford University Press.
117. Wood.D. (1992). Teaching talk. In K. Norman (Ed.), Thinking Voices: The Work of the National Oracy Project. London: Hodder and Straughton.