Visual Enhancing of Tactile Perception in the Posterior Parietal Cortex

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 24-30

  Ro, Tony ^a   Wallace, Ruth ^a   Hagedorn, Judith ^a   Farnè, Alessandro ^b   Pienkos, Elizabeth ^a  

^a RICE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAIN DEPTH STIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; PARIETAL LOBE; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TACTILE STIMULATION; TOUCH; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; VISION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ELECTRIC STIMULATION; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS; HUMANS; MENTAL PROCESSES; NEURAL INHIBITION; NEURAL PATHWAYS; PARIETAL LOBE; REACTION TIME; REFERENCE VALUES; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; TOUCH; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 1642421712     PISSN: 0898929X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/089892904322755520     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Altschuler, E. L., Wisdom, S. B., Stone, L., Foster, C., Galasko, D., Llewellyn, D. M., & Ramachandran, V. S. (1999). Rehabilitation of hemiparesis after stroke with a mirror [letter]. Lancet, 353, 2035-2056.
2. Andersen, R. A., Snyder, L. H., Bradley, D. C., & Xing, J. (1997). Multimodal representation of space in the posterior parietal cortex and its use in planning movements. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 20, 303-330.
3. Bushnell, M. C., Goldberg, M. E., & Robinson, D. L. (1981). Behavioral enhancement of visual responses in monkey cerebral cortex: I. Modulation in posterior parietal cortex related to selective visual attention. Journal of Neurophysiology, 46, 755-772.
4. Cohen, L. G., Bandinelli, S., Sato, S., Kufta, C., & Hallett, M. (1991). Attenuation in detection of somatosensory stimuli by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 81, 366-376.
5. Colby, C. L., & Goldberg, M. E. (1999). Space and attention in parietal cortex. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 22, 319-349.
6. Corbetta, M., Kincade, J. M., Ollinger, J. M., McAvoy, M. P., & Shulman, G. L. (2000). Voluntary orienting is dissociated from target detection in human posterior parietal cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 292-297.
7. Dawson, M. E., Schell, A. M., & Filion, D. L. (2000). The electrodermal system. In J. T. Cacioppo, L. G. Tassinary, & G. G. Berntson (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology (2nd ed., pp. 200-223). New York: Cambridge University Press.
8. Driver, J., & Spence, C. (1998). Crossmodal attention. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 8, 245-253.
9. Egly, R., Rafal, R. D., Henik, A., & Berger, A. (in press). Reflexive and voluntary covert orienting in detection and discrimination tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.
10. Ernst, M. O., & Banks, M. S. (2002). Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature, 415, 429-433.
11. Ernst, M. O., Banks, M. S., & Bulthoff, H. H. (2000). Touch can change visual slant perception. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 69-73.
12. Gibson, J. J. (1933). Adaptation, after-effect and contrast in the perception of curved lines. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 16, 1-31.
13. Graziano, M. S., Cooke, D. F., & Taylor, C. S. (2000). Coding the location of the arm by sight. Science, 290, 1782-1786.
14. Hallett, M. (2000). Transcranial magnetic stimulation and the human brain. Nature, 406, 147-150.
15. Halligan, P. W., Hunt, M., Marshall, J. C., & Wade, D. T. (1996). When seeing is feeling: Acquired synaesthesia or phantom touch? Neurocase, 2, 21-26.
16. Harris, C. (1963). Adaptation to displaced vision: Visual, motor, or proprioceptive change? Science, 140, 812-813.
17. Jahanshahi, M., & Rothwell, J. (2000). Transcranial magnetic stimulation studies of cognition: An emerging field. Experimental Brain Research, 131, 1-9.
18. Kennett, S., Taylor-Clarke, M., & Haggard, P. (2001). Noninformative vision improves the spatial resolution of touch in humans. Current Biology, 11, 1188-1191.
19. Maravita, A., Spence, C., Sergent, C., & Driver, J. (2002). Seeing your own touched hands in a mirror modulates cross-modal interactions. Psychological Science, 13, 350-355.
20. Pascual-Leone, A., Walsh, V., & Rothwell, J. (2000). Transcranial magnetic stimulation in cognitive neuroscience - virtual lesion, chronometry, and functional connectivity. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 10, 232-237.
21. Pavani, F., Spence, C., & Driver, J. (2000). Visual capture of touch: Out-of-the-body experiences with rubber gloves. Psychological Science, 11, 353-359.
22. Pick, H. L., & Hay, J. C. (1964). Adaptation to prismatic distortion. Psychonomic Science, 1, 199-200.
23. Posner, M. I., Nissen, M. J., & Klein, R. M. (1976). Visual dominance: An information-processing account of its origins and significance. Psychological Review, 83, 7157-171.
24. Posner, M. I., Walker J. A., Friedrich, F. J., & Rafal, R. D. (1984). Effects of parietal injury on covert orienting of visual attention. Journal of Neuroscience, 4, 1863-1874.
25. Posner, M. I., Walker, J. A., Friedrich, F. J., & Rafal, R. D. (1987). How do the parietal lobes direct covert attention? Neuropsychologia, 25, 135-146.
26. Ramachandran, V. S., & Hirstein, W. (1998). The perception of phantom limbs. The D. O. Hebb lecture. Brain, 121, 1603-1630.
27. Rock, I., Mack, A., Adams, L., & Hill, A. L. (1965). Adaptation to contradictory information from vision and touch. Psychonomic Science, 3, 435-436.
28. Rock, I., & Victor, J. (1964). Vision and touch: An experimentally created conflict between the two senses. Science, 143, 594-596.
29. Rorden, C., Heutink, J., Greenfield, E., & Robertson, I. H. (1999). When a rubber hand 'feels' what the real hand cannot. NeuroReport, 10, 135-138.
30. Rossetti, Y., Koga, K., & Mano, T. (1993). Prismatic displacement of vision induces transient changes in the timing of eye-hand coordination. Perception & Psychophysics, 54, 355-364.
31. Sathian, K., Greenspan, A. I., & Wolf, S. L. (2000). Doing it with mirrors: A case study of a novel approach to neurorehabilitation. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 14, 73-76.
32. Sekiyama, K., Miyauchi, S., Imaruoka, T., Egusa, H., & Tashiro, T. (2000). Body image as a visuomotor transformation device revealed in adaptation to reversed vision. Nature, 407, 374-377.
33. Seyal, M., Masuoka, L. K., & Browne, J. K. (1992). Suppression of cutaneous perception by magnetic pulse stimulation of the human brain. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 85, 397-401.
34. Seyal, M., Ro, T., & Rafal, R. D. (1995). Increased sensitivity to ipsilateral cutaneous stimuli following transcranial magnetic stimulation of the parietal lobe. Annals of Neurology, 38, 264-267.
35. Shams, L., Kamitani, Y., & Shimojo, S. (2000). Illusions. What you see is what you hear. Nature, 408, 788.
36. Stratton, G. M. (1897). Vision without inversion of the retinal image. Psychological Review, 4, 341-360 and 463-481.
37. Taylor-Clarke, M., Kennett, S., & Haggard, P. (2002). Vision modulates somatosensory cortical processing. Current Biology, 12, 233-236.
38. Tipper, S. P., Lloyd, D., Shorland, B., Dancer, C., Howard, L. A., & McGlone, F. (1998). Vision influences tactile perception without proprioceptive orienting. NeuroReport, 9, 1741-1744.
39. Tipper, S. P., Phillips, N., Dancer, C., Lloyd, D., Howard, L. A., & McGlone, F. (2001). Vision influences tactile perception at body sites that cannot be viewed directly. Experimental Brain Research, 139, 160-167.
40. van Beers, R. J., Wolpert, D. M., & Haggard, P. (2002). When feeling is more important than seeing in sensorimotor adaptation. Current Biology, 12, 834-837.
41. Werhahn, K. J., Mortensen, J., Van Boven, R. W., Zeuner, K. E., & Cohen, L. G. (2002). Enhanced tactile spatial acuity and cortical processing during acute hand deafferentation. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 936-938.
42. Zangaladze, A., Epstein, C. M., Grafton, S. T., & Sathian, K. (1999). Involvement of visual cortex in tactile discrimination of orientation. Nature, 401, 587-590.