Electronic Health Record: Where Does Nutrition Fit In?

Journal of the American Dietetic Association

Volumn 106, Issue 10, 2006, Pages 1688-1695

  Hoggle, Lindsey B ^a   Michael, Madeline A ^a   Houston, Susan M ^a   Ayres, Elaine J ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DATA BASE; DIETETICS; HUMAN; INTERNET; MEDICAL RECORD; METHODOLOGY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; STANDARD; SYSTEM ANALYSIS; UNITED STATES;

DATABASES; DIETETICS; HUMANS; INTERNET; MEDICAL RECORD LINKAGE; MEDICAL RECORDS SYSTEMS, COMPUTERIZED; SOFTWARE; SYSTEMS INTEGRATION; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33748858315     PISSN: 00028223     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jada.2006.07.031     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Mission Statement, Office of the National Coordinator on Health Information Technology (ONCHIT). Available at: http://www.os.dhhs.gov/healthit/mission.html. Accessed July 12, 2005.
2. Institute of Medicine, Committee on Data Standards for Patient Safety. Key Capabilities of an Electronic Health Record System, July 31, 2003. Available at: http://www.iom.edu/report.asp?id=14391. Accessed October 11, 2005.
3. Institute of Medicine, Committee on Improving the Patient Record. In: Dick R.S., and Steen E.B. (Eds). The Computer-Based Patient Record: An Essential Technology for Healthcare (1991), National Academy Sciences, Washington, DC 1-7
4. Institute of Medicine, Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. To Err is Human, Building a Safer Health System (2000), National Academy Press, Washington, DC
5. Institute of Medicine, Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century (2001), National Academy Press, Washington, DC
6. Public Law 104-191, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996. Available at: http://www.cms.hhs.gov/hipaa/hipaa2/general/background/pl104191.asp. Accessed October 12, 2005.
7. Office for Civil Rights-HIPAA Medical Privacy-National Standards to Protect the Privacy of Personal Health Information. Summary of the HIPAA Privacy Rule (2003), Department of Health and Human Services. http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/hipaa/privrulepd.pdf April 11, Available at: http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/hipaa/privrulepd.pdf. Accessed October 12, 2005.
8. Michael P., and Pritchett E. The impact of HIPAA electronic transmissions and health information privacy standards. J Am Diet Assoc 101 (2001) 524-528
9. George W. Bush. The White House, Executive Order April 27, 2004. Available at: http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2004/04/20040427-4.html. Accessed July 12, 2005.
10. Directory of Federal Health Information Technology Programs, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONCHIT), Department of Health and Human Services. Available at: http://www.os.dhhs.gov/healthit/federalprojectlist.html#intitiativestabl e. Accessed October 13, 2005.
11. AHRQ Awards More Than $22 Million in Health Information Technology Implementation Grants: Oct 6, 2005, AHRQ Press Release. Available at: http://healthit.ahrq.gov/home/index.html. Accessed October 12, 2005.
12. Berner E.S., Detmer D.E., and Simborg D. Will the wave finally break? A brief view of the adoption of electronic medical records in the United States. J Am Med Inform Assoc 12 (2005) 3-7
13. Bates D.W., and Gawande A.A. Improving safety with information technology. N Engl J Med 348 (2003) 2526-2534
14. Hillestad R., Bigelow J., Bower A., Girosi F., Meili R., Scoville R., and Taylor R. Can electronic medical record systems transform health care?. Potential health benefits, savings, and costs. Health Affairs 24 (2005) 1103-1117
15. Koppel R., Metlay J., Cohen A., Abaluck B., Localio A., Kimmel S., and Strom B. Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medication errors. JAMA 293 (2005) 1197-1203
16. Ash J.S., Gorman P.N., Seshadri V., and Hersh W.R. Computerized physician order entry in U.S. hospitals: Results of a 2002 survey. J Am Med Inform Assoc 11 (2004) 95-99
17. Patterson E.S., Cook R.I., and Render M.L. Improving patient safety by identifying side effects from introducing bar coding in medication administration. J Am Med Inform Assoc 9 (2002) 540-553
18. FDA Rule Requires Bar Codes on Drugs and Blood to Help Reduce Errors. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/oc/initiatives/barcode-sadr/. Accessed July 12, 2005.
19. Garg A.X., Adhikari N.K., McDonald H., Rosas-Arellano M.P., Devereaux P.J., Beyene J., Sam J., and Haynes R.B. Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: A systematic review. JAMA 293 (2005) 1223-1238
20. Buckovich S.A., Rippen H.E., and Rozen M.J. Driving toward guiding principles: A goal for privacy, confidentiality, and security of health information. J Am Med Inform Assoc 6 (1999) 122-133
21. Closing the Quality Gap: A Critical Analysis of Quality Improvement Strategies. Fact Sheet. AHRQ Publication No. 04-P014 (2004), Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/epc/qgapfact.htm March. Available at: http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/epc/qgapfact.htm. Accessed July 17, 2005.
22. Bates D.W., Evans R.S., Murff H., Stetson P.D., Pizziferri L., and Hripcsak G. Detecting adverse events using information technology. J Am Med Inform Assoc 10 (2003) 115-128
23. Thomas E.J., Lipsitz S.R., Studdert D.M., and Brennan T.A. The reliability of medical record review for estimating adverse event rates. Ann Intern Med 136 (2002) 812-816
24. Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, American Health Information Community (The Community). Available at: http://www.os.dhhs.gov/healthit/ahic.html. Accessed July 17, 2005.
25. Grove A.S. Efficiency in the health care industries: A view from the outside. JAMA 294 (2005) 490-492
26. VanHentenryck K. Health Level Seven: A standard for health information systems. Medical Computing Today. Available at: http://www.medicalcomputingtoday.com/aboutmctoday.html. Accessed October 13, 2005.
27. Bodenheimer T. High and rising health care costs. Part 1: Seeking an explanation. Ann Intern Med 142 (2005) 847-854
28. Bodenheimer T. High and rising health care costs. Part 2: Technologic innovation. Ann Intern Med 142 (2005) 932-937
29. Rhoades J. The Uninsured in America, 1996-2004: Estimates for the U.S. Civilian Noninstitutionalized Population Under Age 65. Statistical Brief #84, Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (2005). http://www.meps.ahrq.gov/PrintProducts/PrintProd_Detail.asp?ID=694&TABLE ='Statistical%20Brief%20#84'&PPTYPE Available at: http://www.meps.ahrq.gov/PrintProducts/PrintProd_Detail.asp?ID=694&T ABLE='Statistical%20Brief%20#84'&PPTYPE. Accessed October 13, 2005.
30. Mearian L. Health care industry could save $81 B a year with e-records, study says. Computer World 2005. Available at: http://www.computerworld.com/printthis/2005/0,4814,104770,00.html. Accessed October 11, 2005.
31. Medicare gives away free electronic health records software. Med Health 59 (2005) 1-2
32. Ledbetter C.S., and Morgan M.W. Toward best practice: Leveraging the electronic patient record as a clinical data warehouse. J Healthc Inf Manag 15 (2001) 119-131
33. Public Law 107-188: Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Response Act of 2002 (2002). http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=107_cong_publi c_laws&docid=f:publ188.107.pdf June 12, Available at: http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=107_cong_publi c_laws&docid=f:publ188.107.pdf. Accessed September 5, 2006.
34. Position of the American Dietetic Association: Domestic food and nutrition security. J Am Diet Assoc 102 (2002) 1840-1841
35. Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. Goals for Strategic Framework. Available at: http://www.os.dhhs.gov/healthit/goals.html. Accessed July 12, 2005.
36. Bertelsen P., Madsen I., and Hostrup P. Work flow analysis prior to implementation of electronic patient records (EPR): A method to disclose inconsistencies between the paper based medical record and EPR. Medinfo 2004 (2004) 1523
37. National Library of Medicine Unified Medical Language System: SNOMED. Available at: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/research/umls/Snomed/snomed_main.html. Accessed July 12, 2005.
38. Hakel-Smith N., and Lewis N.M. A standardized nutrition care process and language are essential components of a conceptual model to guide and document nutrition care and patient outcomes. J Am Diet Assoc 104 (2004) 1878-1884
39. Bakken S., Campbell K.E., Cimino J.J., Huff S.M., and Hammond W.E. Toward vocabulary domain specifications for Health Level 7-Coded data elements. J Am Med Inform Assoc 7 (2000) 333-342
40. VanHenternryck K. Health Level 7: A standard for health information systems. Available at: http://www.medicalcomputingtoday.com/0ophl7.html#article2. Accessed October 14, 2005.
41. Epstein R.M., Alper B.S., and Quill T.E. Communicating evidence for participatory decision making. JAMA 291 (2004) 2359-2366
42. Safe practices for better healthcare: A consensus report. National Quality Forum consensus report 2003. Available at: http://www.qualityforum.org/safe_practices_report.html. Accessed July 12, 2005.
43. Wherry R. Sneak peek 2005: Rob Wherry on health care IT (2005). http://www.forbes.com/business/2004/12/14/sp05_13_rwherry_.html Available at: http://www.forbes.com/business/2004/12/14/sp05_13_rwherry_.html. Accessed July 12
44. Lacey K., and Pritchett E. Nutrition care process and model: ADA adopts road map to quality care and outcomes management. J Am Diet Assoc 103 (2003) 1061-1072
45. American Dietetic Association. MNT evidence-based guides for practice on CD-ROM. Available at: http://www.eatright.org/Member/PolicyInitiatives/83_pgwrk02-03.cfm. Accessed May 3, 2005.
46. Eck L., Slawson D., Williams R., Smith K., Harmon-Clayton K., and Oliver D. A model for making outcomes research standard practice in clinical dietetics. J Am Diet Assoc 98 (1998) 451-457
47. Kieselhorst K.J., Skates J., and Pritchett E. American Dietetic Association: Standards of practice in nutrition care and updated standards of professional performance. J Am Diet Assoc 105 (2005) 641-645
48. ADA Evidence Analysis Library. Available at: http://www.adaevidencelibrary.org/default.cfm. Accessed October 14, 2005.
49. ADA House of Delegates. Key trends affecting the dietetics profession and the American Dietetic Association. J Am Diet Assoc 102 suppl (2002) 1819-1838