Labeled gold nanoparticles immobilized at smooth metallic substrates: Systematic investigation of surface plasmon resonance and surface-enhanced raman scattering

Journal of Physical Chemistry B

Volumn 110, Issue 35, 2006, Pages 17444-17451

  Driskell, Jeremy D ^a,c   Lipert, Robert J ^a   Porter, Marc D ^a,b  

^a IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Arizona State University   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; CHEMISORPTION; GOLD; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS; RAMAN SCATTERING; SURFACE PLASMON RESONANCE;

DYNAMIC DEPOLARIZATION; LABELED GOLD NANOPARTICLES; SURFACE-ENHANCED RAMAN SCATTERING;

NANOSTRUCTURED MATERIALS;

EID: 33748799959     PISSN: 15206106     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jp0636930     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Rohr, T. E.; Cotton, T.; Fan, N.; Tarcha, P. J. Anal. Biochem. 1989, 182, 388.
2. Dou, X.; Takama, T.; Yamaguchi, T.; Tamamoto, H.; Ozaki, Y. Anal. Chem. 1997, 69, 1492.
3. Ni, J.; Lipert, R. J.; Dawson, B.; Porter, M. D. Anal. Chem. 1999, 71, 4903.
4. Graham, D.; Mallinder, B. J.; Whitcombe, D.; Smith, W. E. ChemPhysChem 2001, 12, 746.
5. Graham, D.; Mallinder, B. J.; Whitcombe, D.; Watson, N. D.; Smith, W. E. Anal. Chem. 2002, 74, 1069.
6. Cao, Y. C.; Jin, R.; Mirkin, C. A. Science 2002, 297, 1536.
7. Grubisha, D. S.; Lipert, R. J.; Park, H.-Y.; Driskell, J.; Porter, M. D. Anal. Chem. 2003, 75, 5936.
8. Mulvaney, S. P.; Musick, M. D.; Keating, C. D.; Natan, M. J. Langmuir 2003, 19, 4784.
9. Xu, S.; Ji, X.; Xu, W.; Li, X.; Wang, L.; Bai, Y.; Zhao, B.; Ozaki, Y. Analyst 2004, 129, 63.
10. Faulds, K.; Smith, W. E.; Graham, D. Anal. Chem. 2004, 76, 412.
11. Faulds, K.; Barbagallo, R. P.; Keer, J. T.; Smith, W. E.; Graham, D. Analyst 2004, 129, 567.
12. Park, H.-Y.; Lipert, R. J.; Porter, M. D. SPIE Nanosensing: Mater. Devices 2005, 5593, 464-477.
13. Driskell, J. D.; Kwarta, K. M.; Lipert, R. J.; Porter, M. D.; Neill, J. D.; Ridpath, J. F. Anal. Chem. 2005, 77, 6147.
14. Zhang, X.; Young, M. A.; Lyandres, O.; Duyne, R. P. V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005.
15. Ansari, D. O.; Stuart, D. A.; Nie, S. Nie, SPIE 2005, 5699, 82.
16. Kneipp, K.; Kneipp, H.; Itzkan, I.; Dasari. R. R.; Feld, M. S. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2002, 14, R597.
17. Kerker, M.; Siiman, O.; Wang, D.-S. J. Phys. Chem. 1984, 88, 3168.
18. Kelly, K. L.; Coronado, E.; Zhao, L. L.; Schatz, G. C. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 668.
19. Weitz, D. A.; Garoff, S.; Gramila, T. J. Opt. Lett. 1982, 7, 168.
20. Gupta, R.; Weimer, W. A. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2003, 374, 302.
21. Kahl, M.; Voges, E. Phys. Rev. B 2000, 61, 14078.
22. Liao, P. F.; Stern, M. B. Opt. Lett. 1982, 7, 483.
23. Haynes, C. L.; Duyne, R. P. V. J. Phys. Chem. B 2001, 105, 5599.
24. Haynes, C. L.; Duyne, R. P. V. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 7426.
25. Felidj, N.; Aubard, J.; Levi, G.; Krenn, J. R.; Schider, G.; Leitner, A. ; Aussenegg, F. R. Phys. Rev. B 2002, 66, 245407.
26. Felidj, N.; Aubard, J.; Levi, G.; Krenn, J. R.; Hohenau, A.; Schider, G. ; Leitner, A.; Aussenegg, F. R. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2003, 82, 3095.
27. Link, S.; El-Sayed, M. A. J. Phys. Chem. B 1999, 103, 8410.
28. Jensen, R. R.; Duval, M. L.; Kelly, K. L.; Lazarides, A. A.; Schatz, G. C.; Duyne, R. P. V. J. Phys. Chem. B 1999, 103, 9846.
29. McFarland, A. D.; Duyne, R. P. V. Nano Lett. 2003, 3, 1057.
30. Malinsky, M. D.; Kelly, K. L.; Schatz, G. C.; Duyne, R. P. V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 1471.
31. Jensen, T. R.; Schatz, G. C.; Duyne, R. P. V. J. Phys. Chem. B 1999, 103, 2394.
32. Wei, Q.-H.; Su, K.-H.; Durant, S.; Zhang, X. Nano Lett. 2004, 4, 1067.
33. Kim, K.; Yoon, J. K. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005.
34. Jiang, J.; Bosnick, K.; Maillard, M.; Brus, L. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 9964.
35. Michaels, A. M.; Jiang, J.; Brus, L. J. Phys. Chem. B 2000, 104, 11965.
36. Xu, H.; Bjerneld, E. J.; Kall, M.; Borjesson, L. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1999, 83, 4357.
37. Keating, C. D.; Kovaleski, K. K.; Natan, M. J. J. Phys. Chem. B 1998, 102, 9414.
38. Reinhard, B. M.; Siu, M.; Agarwal, H.; Alivisatos, A. P.; Liphardt, J. Nano Lett. 2005.
39. Holland, W. R.; Hall, D. G. Phys. Rev. B 1983, 27, 7765.
40. Kume, T.; Nakagawa, N.; Hayashi, S.; Tamamoto, K. Solid State Commun. 1995, 93, 171.
41. Shchegrov, A. V.; Novikov, I. V.; Maradudin, A. A. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1997, 78, 4269.
42. Zheng, J.; Zhou, Y.; Li, X.; Ji, Y.; Lu, T.; Gu, R. Langmuir 2003, 19, 632.
43. Kim, K.; Lee, H. S. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005.
44. Orendorff, C. J.; Gole, A.; Sau, T. K.; Murphy, C. J. Anal. Chem. 2005.
45. Aravind, P. K.; Metiu, H. Surf. Sci. 1983, 124, 506.
46. Wind, M. M.; Vlieger, P. A. B. J.; Bedeaux, D. Physica 1987, 143 A, 164.
47. Okamoto, T.; Yamaguchi, I. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 10321.
48. Wokaun, A.; Gordon, J. P.; Liao, P. F. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1982, 48, 957.
49. Zeman, E. J.; Schatz, G. C. J. Phys. Chem. 1987, 91, 634.
50. Creighton, J. A. Metal Colloids. In Surface Enhanced Roman Scattering; Chang, R. K., Furtak, T. E., Eds.; Plenum Press: New York, 1982; p 315.
51. It should be noted, however, that the dielectric function of the surrounding environment differs for that of the suspended particle (water) compared to that of the immobilized particle (air). If the ambient dielectric function were the same for both cases, immobilization would result in an even greater red shift than presented here.
52. Widrig, C. A.; Chung, C.; Porter, M. D. J. Electroanal. Chem. 1991, 310, 35.
53. It was determined that using more than 40 terms does not significantly alter the value for polarizability.
54. Johnson, P. B.; Christy, R. W. Phys. Rev. B 1972, 6, 4370.
55. Kreibig, U.; Vollmer, M. Optical Properties of Metal Clusters; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 1995.
56. The extinction maxima on silver calculated with a gap of 1.2 nm are 617 and 663 nm, respectively, for 60- and 80-nm gold particles. This calculation exemplifies the extreme sensitivity of this system to nanoparticle-substrate separation.
57. Oldenburg, S. J.; Jackson, J. B.; Westcott, S. L.; Halas, N. J. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1999, 75, 2897.
58. The laser focal volume was estimated as a cylinder with a diameter equal to that of the focused beam waist and a height equal to the focal depth.
59. Montelius, L.; Tegenfeldt, J. O. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1993, 62, 2628.
60. -1 maximize with the immobilized 80- and 60-nm particles, respectively. However, smaller signals for these bands resulted in smaller differences in EFs, precluding the ability to draw definitive conclusions.
61. Liver, N.; Nitzan, A.; Gersten, J. I. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1984, 111, 449.
62. Zhang, P.; Haslett, T. L.; Douketis, C.; Moskovits, M. Phys. Rev. B 1998, 57, 15513.
63. Quinten, M. Appl. Phys. B 2001, 73, 245.