Corporate governance: Understanding important contingencies

Corporate Ownership and Control

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 41-50

  Huse, Morten ^a,b  

^a BI NORWEGIAN BUSINESS SCHOOL   (Norway)

^b BOCCONI UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

Author keywords

Board context; Board roles; Contingency theory; Corporate governance

Indexed keywords

EID: 33748789688     PISSN: 17279232     EISSN: 18103057     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.22495/cocv2i4p3     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Aguilera, R.V. & Jackson, G. 2003. The crossnational diversity of corporate governance: Dimensions and determinants. Academy of Management Review, 28: 447-465
2. Barney, J. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage, Journal of Management, 17: 99-120
3. Berle, A., & Means, G. 1932. The modern corporation and private property, New York
4. Blair, M.M. 1995. Ownership and control: Rethinking corporate governance for the twenty-first centure, Washington
5. Davies, G.F. & Useem, M. 2002. Top management, company directors and corporate control. In Pettigrew, Thomas and Whittington. Handbook of strategy and management. London, Sage 232-258
6. Davis, J.H., Schoorman, F.D. & Donaldson, L. 1997. Towards a stewardship theory of management, Academy of Management Review
7. Daily, C.M., Dalton, D.R. & Cannella, A.A. 2003. Corporate governance: Decades of dia logue and data. Academy of Management Review, 28: 371-382
8. Fama, E. & Jensen, M.C. 1983. Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics. 26: 301-325
9. The Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance. 1992. London: Gee and Co
10. Forbes, D. & Milliken, F. 1999. Cognition and corporate governance: understanding boards of directors as strategic decision making groups, Academy of Management Review, 24: 489-505
11. Gabrielsson, J. & Huse, M. 2002. The venture capitalist and the board of directors in SMEs: roles and processes, Venture Capital, 4
12. Gedaljovik, E.R. & Shapiro, D.M. 1998. Management and ownership effects: Evidence from five countries, Strat. Management Journal
13. Hillman, A.J. & Dalziel, T. 2003. Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives, Academy of Management Review, 28: 383-396
14. Huse, M. 1998. Researching board-stakeholder relations, Long Range Planning, 31
15. Huse, M. 2000. Boards of directors in SMEs: A review and research agenda. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 12: 271-290
16. Huse, M. & Rindova, V. 2001. Stakeholders' expectations of board roles: the case of subsidiary boards, Journal of Management and Governance, 5: 153-178
17. Jones, G. R. & Butler, J. E. 1992. Managing internal corporate entrepreneurship: An agency theory perspective. Journal of Management, 18
18. Johannisson, B. & Huse. M. 2000. Recruiting outside board members in the small family business: an ideological challenge. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 12
19. Johnson, J., Daily, C.M. & Ellstrand, A. 1996. Boards of directors: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 22: 409-438
20. Judge, W.Q. 2003. Corporate governance and firm performance in Russia: an empirical study. Journal of World Business, 38: 385-396
21. Kochan, T. 2003. Restoring trust in American corporations: Addressing the root cause, Journal of Management and Governance 7
22. Lorsch, J.W. & MacIver, E. 1989. Pawns and potentates: The reality of America's corporate boards. Boston: Harvard Business School Press
23. Lynall, M.D., Golden, B.R. & Hillman, A.J. 2003. Board composition from adolescence to maturity: A multitheoretical view. Academy of Management Review, 28: 416-431
24. Mace, M.L. 1971. Directors: Myth and reality. Boston: Harvard Business School Press
25. Markman, G.D. Balkin, D.B. & Schjoedt, L. (2001) Governing the innovation process in entrepreneurial firms. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 12
26. McCarthy, D. J & Puffer, S.M. 2003. Corporate governance in Russia: a framework for analysis. Journal of World Business, 38
27. Pedersen, T. & Thomsen, S.: 2003. Ownership structure and value of the largest European firms: The importance of owner identity. Journal of Management and Governance, 7
28. Peng, M.W., Buck, T. & Filatotchev, I. 2003. Do outside directors and new managers help improve firm performance? An exploratory study of Russian privatisation. Journal of World Business, 38: 348-360
29. Pettigrew, A. 1992. On studying managerial elites, Strategic Management Journal, 13
30. Pfeffer, J. & Salancik, G.R. 1978. The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. N. Y.: Harper & Row
31. Shen, W. 2003. The dynamics of the CEOboard relationship: An evolutionary perspective. Academy of Management Review.
32. Stiles, P. & Tayler, B. 2001. Boards at work. Oxford University Press: Oxford
33. Williamson, O.E. 1985. The economic institutions of capitalism. New York: Free Press
34. Wright, M. (2003) Is stakeholder corporate governance appropriate in Russia? Journal of Management and Governance, 7: 263-290.
35. Zahra, S.A., Neubaum, D. & Huse, M. 2000. Entrepreneurship in medium-sized companies: Exploring the effects ownership and governance systems. Journal of Management.
36. Zahra, S.A. & J.A. Pearce 1989. Boards of directors and corporate financial performance: A review and integrative model. Journal of Management, 15: 291-334