Modelling discourse in contested domains: A semiotic and cognitive framework

International Journal of Human Computer Studies

Volumn 64, Issue 11, 2006, Pages 1154-1171

  Mancini, Clara ^a   Buckingham Shum, Simon J ^a  

^a OPEN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Argumentation; Coherence relations; Discourse representation; Ontologies; Semantic annotation; Semantic web; Semiotics

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; COMPUTER AIDED SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK; SEMIOTICS;

COHERENCE RELATIONS; DISCOURSE REPRESENTATION; SEMANTIC ANNOTATION; SEMANTIC WEB;

INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS;

EID: 33748753410     PISSN: 10715819     EISSN: 10959300     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.07.002     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. In: Andriessen J., Baker M., and Suthers D. (Eds). Arguing to Learn: Confronting Cognitions In Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Environments (2003), Springer
2. Asher, N., Denis, P., Kuhn, J., Larson, E., McCready, E., Palmer, A., Reese, B., Wang, L. 2004. Extracting and using discourse structure to resolve anaphoric dependencies: combining logico-semantic and statistical approaches. Proceedings of TALN'04 (Conférence sur le Traitment Automatique du Langage Naturel), Workshop on Segmented Discourse Representation Theory, 22 April, Fèz, Morocco.
3. Asher N., and Lascarides A. Logics of Conversation (2003), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
4. Barthes R. Elements de Sémiologie (1964), Éditions du Seuil, Paris
5. Benn N., Buckingham Shum S., and Domingue J. Integrating scholarly argumentation, texts and community: towards an ontology and services. Fifth International Workshop on Computational Models of Natural Argument. (2005), IJCAI'05: International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Edinburgh, UK
6. Buckingham Shum S. The roots of computer supported argument visualisation. In: Kirschner P.A., Buckingham Shum S., and Carr Ch.S. (Eds). Visualising Argumentation. Software Tools for Collaborative and Educational Sense-Making (2003), Springer, London 3-24
7. Buckingham Shum S., and Hammond N. Argumentation-based design rationale: what use at what cost?. International Journal of Human Computer Studies 40 4 (1994) 603-652
8. Buckingham Shum S., Motta E., and Domingue J. Representing scholarly claims in internet digital libraries: a knowledge modelling approach. Proceedings ECDL'99: Third European Conference on Digital Libraries, Paris, September 22-24, 1999. In: Abiteboul S., and Vercoustre A.-M. (Eds). Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol. 1696 (1999), Springer, Berlin
9. Buckingham Shum, S., Motta, E., Domingue, J. 2002. Augmenting design deliberation with compendium: the case of collaborative ontology design. Workshop on Facilitating Hypertext-Augmented Collaborative Modelling. ACM Hypertext Conference, Maryland, June 11-12th, 2002 (http://kmi.open.ac.uk/projects/compendium/SBS-HT02-Compendium.html)
10. Buckingham Shum, S., Uren, V., Li, G., Sereno, B., Mancini, C. (In Press). Modelling naturalistic argumentation in research literatures: representation and interaction design issues. International Journal of Intelligent Systems (special issue on Computational Modelling of Natural Argument), Reed, C., Grasso, F. (Eds.).
11. Chklovski T., Ratnakar V., and Gil Y. User interfaces with semi-formal representations: a study of designing argumentation structures. Proceedings of International conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI 2005), January 9-12 (2005), ACM Press, San Diego, NY, USA
12. Clancey, W.J., Sierhuis, M., Alena, R., Berrios, D., Dowding, J., Graham, J.S., Tyree, K.S., Hirsh, R.L., Garry, W.B., Semple, A., Buckingham Shum, S.J., Shadbolt, N., Rupert, S. 2005. Automating capcom using mobile agents and robotic assistants. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics 1st Space Exploration Conference, 31 January-1 February, 2005, Orlando, FL. Available from: AIAA Meeting Papers on Disc [CD-ROM]: Reston, VA, and as Advanced Knowledge Technologies ePrint 375: http://eprints.aktors.org/375
13. Eco U. La Struttura Assente (1968), Bompiani, Milano
14. Gangemi A., Borgo S., Catenacci C., and Lehmann J. Task taxonomies for knowledge content. METOKIS Deliverable (2004) D07
15. Handschuh S., and Staab S. Authoring and annotation of web pages in CREAM. In: Proceedings of the 11th International World Wide Web Conference (2002)
16. Hjelmslev, L. 1959. Essais Linguistiques. Traxaux du Cercle Linguistique de Copenhague, p. 12.
17. Hobbs, J.R. 1985. On the coherence and structure of discourse. Technical Report CSLI-85-37, Stanford, CA.
18. Kirschner, P.A., Buckingham Shum, S.J., Carr, C.S. (Eds.), 2003. Visualizing Argumentation: Software Tools for Collaborative and Educational Sense-Making. Springer, London (www.VisualizingArgumentation.info).
19. Knott A. Similarity and contrast relations and inductive rules. Proceedings of the ACL Workshop on Discourse Relations and Discourse Markers (1998), Association for Computational Linguistics, Montreal pp. 54-57
20. Knott A., and Dale R. Using linguistic phenomena to motivate a set of coherence relations. Discourse Processes 18 1 (1994) 35-62
21. Knott A., and Mellish C. A feature-based account of the relations signalled by sentence and clause connectives. Language and Speech 39 2/3 (1996) 142-183
22. Knott A., and Sanders T.J.M. The classification of coherence relations: an exploration of two languages. Journal of Pragmatics 30 2 (1998) 135-175
23. Liu K. Semiotics in Information Systems Engineering (2000), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
24. Liu K. Requirements reengineering from legacy information systems using semiotic techniques, systems, signs and actions. An International Journal on Communication, Information Technology and Work 1 1 (2005) 36-61
25. Louwerse M. An analytic and cognitive parametrization of coherence relations. Cognitive Linguistics 12 3 (2001) 291-315
26. Lowrance, J.D., Harrison, I.W., Rodriguez, A.C., 2001. Capturing analytic thought. In: Proceedings First International Conference on Knowledge Capture, October 2001, pp. 84-91. ACM Press, New York.
27. Mancini C. Cinematic hypertext. Investigating a new paradigm. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications (2005), IOS Press, Amsterdam
28. Mancini C., and Buckingham Shum S. Cognitive coherence relations and hypertext: from cinematic patterns to scholarly discourse. Proceeding of ACM Hypertext '01, Aarhus, Denmark, August 14-18 (2001), ACM Press, New York pp. 165-174
29. Mancini C., and Buckingham Shum S. Towards cinematic hypertext. Proceeding of ACM Hypertext '04, Santa Cruz, CA, USA, August 9-13 (2004), ACM Press, New York
30. Mann W.C., and Thompson S.A. Rhetorical Structure Theory: Toward a Functional Theory of Text Organisation. Text 8 3 (1988) 243-281
31. Metz, C. 1977. Le signifiant imaginaire. Psychanalyse et cinéma. Union Générale d'Éditions, Paris.
32. Pander Maat H. The differential linguistic realisation of comparative and additive coherence relations. Cognitive Linguistics 10 2 (1999) 147-184
33. Pander Maat H., and Degand L. Scaling causal relations and connectives in terms of speaker involvement. Cognitive Linguistics 12 3 (2001) 211-245
34. Peirce C. Collected Papers (1931-1935), The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
35. Reed C.A., and Norman T.J. Argumentation Machines: New Frontiers in Argument and Computation (2003), Kluwer, Dordrecht
36. Sanders T.J.M. Semantic and pragmatic sources of coherence: on the categorisation of coherence relations in context. Discourse Processes 24 (1997) 119-147
37. Sanders T.J.M., and Noordman L.G.M. The role of coherence relations and their linguistic markers in text processing. Discourse Processes 29 1 (2000) 37-60
38. Sanders T.J.M., and Spooren W. Text Representation as an Interface Between Language and its Users. In: Sanders T.J.M., Schilperoord J., and Spooren W. (Eds). Text Representation. Linguistic and Psycholinguistic aspects (2001), University of Utrecht, University of Tilburg, Free University of Amsterdam 1-26
39. Sanders T.J.M., Spooren W.P.M., and Noordman L.G.M. Towards a taxonomy of coherence relations. Discourse Processes 15 (1992) 1-35
40. Sanders T.J.M., Spooren W.P.M., and Noordman L.G.M. Coherence relations in a cognitive theory of discourse representation. Cognitive Linguistics 4 2 (1993) 93-133
41. Saussure De.F. Cours de Linguistique Générale (1922), Editions Payot, Paris
42. Selvin A.M., and Buckingham Shum S. Rapid knowledge construction: a case study in corporate contingency planning using collaborative hypermedia. Knowledge and Process Management 9 2 (2002) 119-128
43. Sereno, B., 2006. A document-centric semantic annotation environment to support sense-making. Doctoral Thesis, Knowledge Media Institute, The Open University, UK (http://kmi.open.ac.uk/publications/pdf/KMI-TR-06-13.pdf).
44. Sereno B., Buckingham Shum S., and Motta E. ClaimSpotter: an environment to support sensemaking with knowledge triples. Proceedings of International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI 2005), January 9-12, San Diego, USA (2005), ACM Press, NY
45. Sowa J.F. Ontology, metadata and semiotics. Proceedings of International Conference on Conceptual Structures, ICCS'2000 (2000), Damstadt
46. Uren V., Buckingham Shum S., Li G., Domingue J., and Motta E. Scholarly Publishing and Argument in Hyperspace. WWW 2003: 12th International World Wide Web Conference. (2003), ACM Press, Budapest, Hungary pp. 244-250
47. Uren V., Buckingham Shum S., Li G., and Bachler M. Sensemaking tools for understanding research literatures: design, implementation and user evaluation. International Journal of Human Computer Studies 64 5 (2006) 420-445
48. Vargas-Vera M., Motta E., Domingue J., Lanzoni M., Stutt A., and Ciravegna F. MnM: ontology driven semi-automatic and automatic support for semantic markup. In: Gomez-Perez A. (Ed). 13th International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Management (EKAW 2002) (2002), Springer
49. Weick K.E. Sensemaking in Organizations (1995), Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA