Experimental and computational analyses of the effects of slice distortion from a metallic sphere in an MRI phantom

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 24, Issue 8, 2006, Pages 1077-1085

  Hopper, Tim A J ^a,b   Vasilić, Branimir ^b   Pope, James M ^a   Jones, Catherine E ^b   Epstein, Charles L ^b   Song, Hee Kwon ^b   Wehrli, Felix W ^b  

^a QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Magnetic susceptibilities; Metal artifact; MRI; Slice distortion; View angle tilting

Indexed keywords

AGAROSE; STAINLESS STEEL;

ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; EMBEDDING; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; MAGNETISM; METAL IMPLANTATION; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; THEORETICAL STUDY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ARTIFACTS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; STAINLESS STEEL;

EID: 33748752031     PISSN: 0730725X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2006.04.019     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Schenck J.F. The role of magnetic susceptibility in magnetic resonance imaging: MRI magnetic compatibility of the first and second kinds. Med Phys 23 (1996) 815-850
2. Bennett L.H., Wang P.S., and Donahue M.J. Artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging from metals. J Appl Phys 79 8 (1996) 4712-4714
3. Hwang S., and Wehrli F. Calculation of the susceptibility-induced magnetic field from 3D NMR images with applications to trabecular bone. J Magn Res 109 (1995) 126-145
4. White L.M., Kim J.K., Mehta M., Merchant N., Schweitzer M.E., Morrison W.B., et al. Complications of total hip arthroplasty: MR imaging - initial experience. Radiology 215 (2000) 254-262
5. Ludeke K.M., Roschmann P., and Tischler R. Susceptibility artifacts in NMR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 3 (1985) 329-343
6. Czerny C., Krestan C., Imhof H., and Trattnig S. Magnetic resonance imaging of the postoperative hip. Top Magn Reson Imaging 10 4 (1999) 214-220
7. Ebraheim N.A., Savolaine E.R., Zeiss J., and Jackson W.T. Titanium hip implants for improved magnetic resonance and computed tomography examinations. Clin Orthop Relat Res 275 (1992) 194-198
8. Ganapathi M., Joseph G., Savage R., Jones A.R., Timms B., and Lyons K. MRI susceptibility artefacts related to scaphoid screws: the effect of screw type, screw orientation and imaging parameters. J Hand Surg (British and European Volume) 27B 2 (2002) 165-170
9. Olsen R.V., Munk P.L., Lee M.J., Janzen D.L., Mackay A.L., Xiang Q.-S., et al. Metal artifact reduction sequence: early clinical applications. Radiographics 20 (2000) 699-712
10. Shellock F.G., and Crues J.V. High-field strength MR imaging and metallic biomedical implants: an ex vivo evaluations of deflection forces. AJR Am J Roentgenol 151 (1988) 389-392
11. Suh J.-S., Jeong E.-K., Shin K.-H., Cho J.H., Na J.-B., Kim D.-H., et al. Minimizing artifacts caused by metallic implants at MR imaging: experimental and clinical studies. AJR Am J Roentgenol 171 (1998) 1207-1213
12. Haacke E.M., Brown R.W., Thompson M.R., and Venkatesan R. Magnetic resonance imaging: physical principles and sequence design (1999), John Wiley and Sons, New York
13. Camacho C.R., Plewes D.B., and Henkelman R.M. Nonsusceptibility artifacts due to metallic objects in MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 5 (1995) 75-88
14. Kolind S.H., Mackay A., Munk P.L., and Xiang Q.S. Quantitative evaluation of metal artifact reduction techniques. J Magn Reson Imaging 20 (2004) 487-495
15. Petersilge C.A., Lewin J.S., Duerk J.L., Yoo J.U., and Ghaneyem A.J. Optimization of parameters for MR evaluation of the spine with titanium pedicle screws. AJR Am J Roentgenol 166 (1996) 1213-1218
16. Shellock F.G. MR imaging of metallic implants and materials: a complication of the literature. AJR Am J Roentgenol 151 (1988) 811-814
17. Balcom B., MacGregor R., Beyea S., Green P., Armstrong R., and Bremner W. Single-point ramped imaging with T1 enhancement (SPRITE). J Magn Reson Imaging 123 (1996) 131-134
18. Ramos-Cabrer P., Duynhoven J.P.M., Toorn A.V.D., and Nicolay K. MRI if hip prosthesis using single-point methods: in vitro studies towards the artifact-free imaging of individuals with metal implants. Magn Reson Imaging 22 (2004) 1097-1103
19. Cho Z.H., Kim D.J., and Kim Y.K. Total inhomogeneity correction including chemical shifts and susceptibility by view angle tilting. Med Phys 15 (1988) 7-11
20. Butts K., Pauly J.M., Daniel B.L., Kee S., and Norbash A.M. Management of biopsy needle artifacts: techniques for RF-refocused MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 9 (1999) 586-595
21. Daniel B.L., and Butts K. The use of view angle tilting to reduce distortions in magnetic resonance imaging of cryosurgery. J Magn Reson 18 (2000) 281-286
22. Butts K., Pauly J.M., and Gold G.E. Reduction of blurring in view angle tilting MRI. Magn Reson Med 53 (2005) 418-424
23. Callaghan P.T. Susceptibility-limited resolution in nuclear magnetic resonance microscopy. J Magn Reson 87 (1990) 304-318
24. White L.M., and Buckwalter K.A. Technical considerations: CT and MR imaging in the postoperative orthopedic patient. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 6 1 (2002) 5-17
25. Bakker C.J.G., Bhagwandien R., Moerland M.A., and Ramos L.M.P. Simulation of susceptibility artifacts in 2D and 3D Fourier transform spin-echo and gradient-echo magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 12 5 (1994) 767-774
26. Shellock F.G., Morisoli S., and Kanal E. MR procedures and biomedical implants, materials, and devices: 1993 updates. Radiology 189 (1993) 587-599
27. Beuf O., Briguet A., Lissac M., and Davis R. Magnetic resonance imaging for the determination of magnetic susceptibility of materials. J Magn Reson B 112 (1996) 111-118