Exploring barriers to long-term follow-up in newborn screening programs

Genetics in Medicine

Volumn 8, Issue 9, 2006, Pages 563-570

  Hoff, Timothy ^a,c   Hoyt, Adrienne ^a   Therrell, Brad ^b   Ayoob, Maria ^a  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^b National Newborn Screening and Genetics Resource Center   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY AT ALBANY   (United States)

Author keywords

Long term follow up; Newborn screening; Public health; State policy

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MEDICAL PRACTICE; NEWBORN SCREENING; PUBLIC HEALTH; QUALITY CONTROL; QUESTIONNAIRE; UNITED STATES;

FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; NEONATAL SCREENING; PUBLIC HEALTH PRACTICE; PUBLIC POLICY; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; QUESTIONNAIRES; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33748742728     PISSN: 10983600     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.gim.0000237790.54074.3d     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Newborn Screening Task Force, American Academy of Pediatrics. Serving the family from birth to the medical home - Newborn screening: A blueprint for the future. Pediatrics 2000;106:383-427.
2. Therrell BL,. U.S. newborn screening policy dilemmas for the twenty-first century. Mol Genet Metab 2001;74:64-74.
3. AAP Newborn Screening Task Force. Serving the family from birth to the medical home. Newborn Screening: A blueprint for the future. Pediatrics 2000; 106: 389-427.
4. Maternal and Child Health Bureau. Newborn screening: Toward a uniform screening panel and system. 2004. Available online at: ftp.hrsa.gov/mchb/ genetics/screeningdraftforcomment.pdf. Accessed on March 6, 2006.
5. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Newborn screening follow-up: Proposed guideline. Available at: http://www.nccls.org/. Accessed December 21, 2005.
6. Dodd CJ, DeWine M. Newborn screening: Characteristics of state programs. Available at: http://www.gao.gov. Accessed March 20, 2005.
7. Harteloh PP. Quality systems in health care: A sociotechnical approach. Health Policy 2003;64:391-398.
8. Spath P. Improve quality with systems thinking. Part 1. Hospital Peer Review 27:173-175, 2002.
9. Keane C, Marx J, et al. The perceived impact of privatization on local health departments. Am J Public Health 2002;92:1178-1180.
10. Saxena A. Issues in newborn screening. Genet Test 2003;7:131-134.
11. Clayton EW. Issues in state newborn screening programs. Pediatrics 1992;90:641-646.
12. Kim S, Lloyd-Puryear MA, Tonniges TF. Examination of the communication practices between state newborn screening programs and the medical home. Pediatrics 2003;111:120-126.
13. Mandl KD, Feit S, Larson C, Kohane IS. Newborn screening program practices in the United States: notification, research and consent. Pediatrics 2002;109:269-273.
14. Newborn screening programs in the U.S., October 2005. Available at: http://genes-r-us.uthscsa.edu. Accessed November 15, 2005.
15. Cohen J, Cohen P. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Second Edition. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1983.