Determination of activation areas in the human auditory cortex by means of synthetic aperture magnetometry

NeuroImage

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 995-1005

  Herdman, Anthony T ^a   Wollbrink, Andreas ^a,b   Chau, Wilkin ^a   Ishii, Ryouhei ^a,c   Ross, Bernhard ^a,b   Pantev, Christo ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL MÜNSTER   (Germany)

^c OSAKA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Dipole source modelling; Magnetoencephalography; Synthetic aperture magnetometry (SAM); Transient and steady state auditory evoked fields

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY CORTEX; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BRAIN FUNCTION; BRAIN TISSUE; DIPOLE; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; MODEL; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STEADY STATE; SYNTHETIC APERTURE MAGNETOMETRY; WAVEFORM;

EID: 0142042794     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00403-8     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Barnes G.R., Hillebrand A. Statistical flattening of MEG beamformer images. Hum. Brain Mapp. 18:(1):2003;1-12.
2. Belin P., Zatorre R.J., Hoge R., Evans A.C., Pike B. Event-related fMRI of the auditory cortex. Neuroimage. 10:(4):1999;417-429.
3. Bertrand O., Perrin F., Pernier J. Evidence for a tonotpic organization of the auditory cortex observed with auditory evoked potentials. Acta Otolaryngol. Suppl. 491:1991;116-123.
4. Bilecen D., Scheffler K., Schmid N., Tschopp K., Seelig J. Tonotopic organization of the human auditory cortex as detected by BOLD-fMRI. Hearing Research. 126:1998;19-27.
5. Cohen L.T., Rickards F.W., Clark G.M. A comparison of steady-state evoked potentials to modulated tones in awake and sleeping humans. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 90:1991;2467-2479.
6. Eggermont J.J., Ponton C.W. The neurophysiology of auditory perception from single units to evoked potentials . Audiol. Neuro-Otology. 7:(2):2002;71-99.
7. Elberling C., Bak C., Kofoed B., Lebech J., Saermark K. Magnetic auditory responses from the human brain. Scand. Audiol. 9:1980;185-190.
8. Elberling C., Bak C., Kofoed B., Lebech J., Saermark K. Auditory magnetic fields. Scand. Audiol. 11:1982;61-65.
9. Galaburda A., Sanides F. Cytoarchitectonic organization of the human auditory cortex. J. Comp. Neurol. 190:1980;597-610.
10. Galambos R., Makeig S., Talmachoff P. A 40-Hz auditory potential recorded from the human scalp. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 78:(4):1981; 2643-2647.
11. Gutschalk A., Mase R., Roth R., et al. Deconvolution of 40 Hz steady-state fields reveals two overlapping source activities of the human auditory cortex. Clin. Neurophysiol. 110:(5):1999;856-868.
12. Hamalainen M., Hari R., Ilmoniemi R.J., Knuutila J., Lounasmaa O.V. Magnetoencephalography - theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain review . Mod. Phys. 65:(2):1993;413-496.
13. Hari R., Aittoniemi K., Jarvinen M.-L., Katila T., Varpula T. Auditory evoked transient and sustained magnetic fields of the human brain. Exp. Brain Res. 40:1980;237-240.
14. Hari R., Hamalainen M., Joutsiniemi S. Neuromagnetic steady-state responses to auditory stimuli. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 86:1989;1033-1039.
15. Hari R., Makela J.P. Neuromagnetic responses to frequency modulation of a continuous tone. Acta Oto-Laryngol. Suppl. 432:1986;26-32.
16. Hari R., Pelizzone M., Makela J.P., et al. Neuromagnetic responses of the human auditory cortex to on- and offsets of noise bursts. Audiol. 26:(1):1987;31-43.
17. Herdman A.T., Lins O., Van Roon P., et al. Intracerebral sources of human auditory steady-state responses. Brain Topogr. 15:(2):2002;69-86.
18. Ilmoniemi R.J., Williamson S.J., Hostetler W.E. New method for the study of spontaneous brain activity. Williamson S.J. Biomagnetism. 1987;182-185 Tokyo Denki University Press, Tokyo.
19. Ishii R., Shinosaki K., Ukai S., et al. Medial prefrontal cortex generates frontal midline theta rhythm. NeuroReport. 10:(4):1999;675-679.
20. Jacobson G.P. Magnetoencephalographic studies of auditory system function. J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 11:(3):1994;343-365.
21. Johnsrude I.S., Giraud A.L., Frackowiak R.S. Functional imaging of the auditory system the use of positron emission tomography . Audiol. Neuro-Otol. 7:(5):2002;251-276.
22. Kanno A., Nakasato N., Murayama N., Yoshimoto T. Middle and long latency peak sources in auditory evoked magnetic fields for tone bursts in humans. Neurosci. Lett. 293:2001;187-190.
23. Lockwood A.H., Salvi R.J., Coad M.L., et al. The functional anatomy of the normal human auditory system responses to 0.5 and 4.0 kHz tones at varied intensities . Cereb. Cortex. 9:(1):1999;65-76.
24. Makela J.P., Hari R. Evidence for cortical origin of the 40 Hz auditory evoked response in man. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 66:1987;539-546.
25. Naatanen R., Picton T. The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound a review and an analysis of the component structure . Psychophysiology. 24:(4):1987;375-425.
26. Pantev C. Evoked and induced gamma-band activity of the human cortex. Brain Topogr. 7:(4):1995;321-330.
27. Pantev C., Bertrand O., Eulitz C., et al. Specific tonotopic organizations of different areas of the human auditory cortex revealed by simultaneous magnetic and electric recordings. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 94:(1):1995;26-40.
28. Pantev C., Elbert T., Makeig S., et al. Relationship of transient and steady-state auditory evoked fields. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 88:(5):1993;389-396.
29. Pantev C., Gallen C., Hampson S., Buchanan S., Sobel D. Reproducibility and validity of neuromagnetic source localization using a large array biomagnetometer. Am. J. EEG Technol. 31:1991;83-101.
30. Pantev C., Hoke M., Lutkenhoner B., Lehnertz K. Neuromagnetic evidence of functional organization of the auditory cortex in humans. Acta Otolaryngol. Suppl. 491:1991;106-114.
31. Pantev C., Roberts L.E., Elbert T., Ross B., Wienbruch C. Tonotopic organization of the sources of human auditory steady-state responses. Hear. Res. 101:(1-2):1996;62-74.
32. Pastor M.A., Artieda J., Arbizu J., et al. Activation of human cerebral and cerebellar cortex by auditory stimulation at 40 Hz. J. Neurosci. 22:(23):2002;10501-10506.
33. Picton T.W., Hillyard S.A., Krausz H.I., Galambos R. Human auditiory evoked potentials. I. Evaluation of components. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 36:1974;179-190.
34. Reite M., Adams M., Simon J., et al. Auditory M100 component 1 relationship to Heschl's gyri . Cogn. Brain Res. 2:(1):1994;13-20.
35. Reite M., Zimmerman J.T., Zimmerman J.E. Magnetic auditory evokde fields interhemispheric asymetry . Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 51:1981;388-392.
36. Robinson, S.E., 1989, Theory and properties of lead field synthesis analysis, in: Williamson, S., Hoke, M., Struink, G., Kotani, M. (Eds.), Advances in Biomagnetism, Plenum Press, pp. 599-602.
37. Robinson S.E., Rose D.F. Current source image estimation by spatially filtered MEG. Romani G. Biomagnetism Clinical Aspects . 1992;761-765 Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam.
38. Robinson, S.E., Vrba, J., 1998. Functional neuroimaging by synthetic aperture magnetometry (SAM). in: Yoshimoto, T., Kotani, M., Kuriki, S., Karibe, H., Nakasato, N. (Eds.), Recent Advances in Biomagnetism. Tohuku University Press, Sendai, pp. 302-305.
39. Romani G.L. Tomotopic organization of the human auditory cortex revealed by steady state neuromagnetic measurements. Acta Otolaryngol. Suppl. 432:1986;33-34.
40. Ross B., Picton T.W., Pantev C. Temporal integration in the human auditory cortex as represented by the development of the steady-state magnetic field. Hearing Res. 165:(1-2):2002;68-84.
41. Scheffler K., Bilecen D., Schmid N., Tschopp K., Seelig J. Auditory cortical responses in hearing subjects and unilateral deaf patients as detected by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Cereb. Cortex. 8:(2):1998;156-163.
42. Scherg M., von Cramon D. Two bilateral sources of the late AEP as identified by a spatio-temporal dipole model. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 62:1985;32-44.
43. Singh K.D., Barnes G.R., Hillebrand A., Forde E.M., Williams A.L. Task-related changes in cortical synchronization are spatially coincident with the hemodynamic response. NeuroImage. 16:(1):2002;103-114.
44. Talavage T.M., Ledden P.J., Benson R.R., Rosen B.R., Melcher J.R. Frequency-dependent responses exhibited by multiple regions in human auditory cortex. Hear. Res. 150:(1-2):2000;225-244.
45. Taniguchi M., Kato A., Fujita N., et al. Movement-related desynchronization of the cerebral cortex studied with spatially filtered magnetoencephalography. NeuroImage. 12:(3):2000;298-306.
46. Van Veen B.D., van Drongelen W., Yuchtman M., Suzuki A. Localization of brain electrical activity via linearly constrained minimum variance spatial filtering. IEEE Transact. Biomed. Engineer. 44:(9):1997;866-880.
47. Wessinger C.M., Buonocore M.H., Kussmaul C.L., Mangun G.R. Tonotopy in human auditory cortex examined with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Brain Mapp. 5:1997;18-25.
48. Yamamoto T., Williamson S.J., Kaufman L., Nicholson C., Llinás R. Magnetic localization of neuronal activity in the human brain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 85:1988;8732-8736.