EEG evidence of stimulus-directed response dynamics in human somatosensory cortex

Brain Research

Volumn 815, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 326-336

  Kelly, Edward F ^a   Folger, Stephen E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

Driving response; EEG; Microstimulation; Sensory system; Short term plasticity; Somatosensory cortex; Vibrotaction

Indexed keywords

AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVOKED SOMATOSENSORY RESPONSE; FREQUENCY ANALYSIS; HUMAN; MALE; MECHANORECEPTOR; MODEL; PLASTICITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSORY SYSTEM ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TACTILE STIMULATION;

BRAIN MAPPING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; HAND; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MECHANORECEPTORS; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NEURONS, AFFERENT; PHYSICAL STIMULATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX; VIBRATION;

EID: 0033537333     PISSN: 00068993     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0006-8993(98)01087-7     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Albrecht D., Farrar S., Hamilton D. Spatial contrast adaptation characteristics of neurones recorded in the cat's visual cortex. J. Physiol. 347:1984;713-739.
2. Allison T., McCarthy G., Wood C.C., Darcey T.M., Spencer D.D., Williamson P.D. Human cortical potentials evoked by stimulation of the median nerve: I. Cytoarchitectonic areas generating short-latency activity. J. Neurophysiol. 62:1989;694-710.
3. Allison T., McCarthy G., Wood C.C., Jones S.J. Potentials evoked in human and monkey cerebral cortex by stimulation of the median nerve: a review of scalp and intracranial recordings. Brain. 114:1991;2465-2503.
4. Apkarian A.V. Functional imaging of pain: new insights regarding the role of the cerebral cortex in human pain perception. Seminars in the Neurosciences. 7:1995;279-293.
5. Bach M., Greenlee M., Buhler B. Contrast adaptation can increase visually evoked potential amplitude. Clin. Vision Sci. 3:1988;185-194.
6. Bolanowski S.J. Jr., Gescheider G.A., Verrillo R.T., Checkosky C.M. Four channels mediate the mechanical aspects of touch. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 84:1988;1680-1694.
7. Bonds A.B. Temporal dynamics of contrast gain in single cells of the cat striate cortex. Visual Neurosci. 6:1991;239-255.
8. Boyle J., Kelly E.F. Combined MRI-EEG techniques for correlation of anatomy and function in human somatosensory cortex. Proc. Soc. Photo-Optical Instr. Engrs. 2168:1994;225-232.
9. Buchner H., Fuchs M., Wischmann H.-A., Dössel O., Ludwig I., Knepper A., Berg P. Source analysis of median nerve and finger stimulated somatosensory evoked potentials: multichannel simultaneous recording of electric and magnetic fields combined with 3D-MR tomography. Brain Topog. 6:1994;299-310.
10. M. Diamond, Organization of somatic sensory cortex: the detection of discrete topographic units and evidence for their integrative function, Doctoral Dissertation, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, 1989.
11. Dunseath W.J.R., Kelly E.F. Multichannel PC-based data-acquisition system for high-resolution EEG. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 42:1995;1212-1217.
12. Favorov O.V., Kelly D.G. Minicolumnar organization within somatosensory cortical segregates: I. Development of afferent connections. Cerebral Cortex. 4:1994;408-427.
13. Favorov O.V., Kelly D.G. Minicolumnar organization within somatosensory cortical segregates: II. Emergent functional properties. Cerebral Cortex. 4:1994;428-442.
14. M. Fuchs, M. Wagner, H.-A. Wischmann, K. Ottenburg, O. Dössel, Possibilities of functional brain imaging using a combination of MEG and MRT, in: C. Pantev (Ed.), Oscillatory Event-Related Brain Dynamics, Plenum, New York, 1994, pp. 435-457.
15. George J.S., Aine C.J., Mosher J.C., Schmidt D.M., Ranken D.M., Schlitt H.A., Wood C.C., Lewine J.D., Sanders J.A., Belliveau J.W. Mapping function in the human brain with magnetoencephalography, anatomical magnetic resonance imaging, and functional magnetic resonance imaging. J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 12:1995;406-431.
16. Goble A.K., Hollins M. Vibrotactile adaptation enhances amplitude discrimination. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 93:1993;418-424.
17. Goble A.K., Hollins M. Vibrotactile adaptation enhances frequency discrimination. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 96:1994;771-780.
18. Goff G.D. Differential discrimination of frequency of cutaneous mechanical vibration. J. Exp. Psychol. 74:1967;294-299.
19. Goodwin A.W., John K.T., Darian-Smith I. Skin profiles during sinusoidal vibration of the fingerpad. Exp. Brain Res. 77:1989;79-86.
20. Greenlee M., Heitger F. The functional role of contrast adaptation. Vision Res. 28:1988;791-797.
21. Hagbarth K.-E., Hongell R.G., Hallin R.G., Torebjork H.E. Afferent impulses in median nerve fascicles evoked by tactile stimuli of the human hand. Brain Res. 24:1970;423-442.
22. Hollins M., Goble A.K., Whitsel B.L., Tommerdahl M. Time course and action spectrum of vibrotactile adaptation. Somatosens. and Motor Res. 7:1990;205-221.
23. Jasper H.H. Report of committee on methods of clinical examination in electroencephalography. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 10:1958;370-375.
24. Johansson R.S., Landstrom U., Lundstrom R. Responses of mechanoreceptive afferent units in the glabrous skin of the human hand to sinusoidal skin displacements. Brain Res. 244:1982;17-25.
25. Johnson K.O. Reconstruction of population response to a vibratory stimulus in quickly adapting mechanoreceptive afferent fiber population innervating glabrous skin of the monkey. J. Neurophysiol. 37:1974;48-72.
26. Juliano S.L., Whitsel B.L. Metabolic labeling associated with index finger stimulation in monkey SI: between animal variability. Brain Res. 342:1985;242-251.
27. Kaas J.H., Nelson R.J., Sur M., Merzenich M.M. Multiple representations of the body within the primary somatosensory cortex of primates. Science. 204:1979;521-523.
28. Kelly E.F., McLaughlin D.F., Dunseath W.J.R., Folger S., Hudnell H.K. Frequency-domain measurement of vibrotactile driving responses in first-order afferent populations. Exp. Brain Res. 109:1996;500-506.
29. Kelly E.F., Trulsson M., Folger S.E. Periodic microstimulation of single mechanoreceptive afferents produces frequency-following responses in human EEG. J. Neurophysiol. 77:1997;137-144.
30. LaMotte R.H., Mountcastle V.B. Capacities of humans and monkeys to discriminate between vibratory stimuli of different frequency and amplitude: a correlation between neural events and psychophysical measurements. J. Neurophysiol. 38:1975;539-559.
31. S.L. Marple Jr., Digital Spectral Analysis with Applications, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1987.
32. McKenna T.M., Whitsel B.L., Dreyer D.A. Anterior parietal cortical topographic organization in Macaque monkey: a reevaluation. J. Neurophysiol. 48:1982;289-317.
33. McLaughlin D.M., Kelly E.F. Evoked potentials as indices of adaptation in the somatosensory system: a review and prospectus. Brain Res. Rev. 18:1993;151-206.
34. Mountcastle V.B., Steinmetz M.A., Romo R. Frequency discrimination in the sense of flutter: psychophysical measurements correlated with postcentral events in behaving monkeys. J. Neurosci. 10:1990;3032-3044.
35. Namerow N.S., Sclabassi R.J., Enns N.F. Somatosensory responses to stimulus trains: normative data. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 37:1974;11-21.
36. P. Nunez, Electric Fields of the Brain: The Neurophysics of EEG, Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 1981, 484 pp.
37. Ohzawa I., Sclar G., Freeman R. Contrast gain control in the cat's visual system. J. Neurophysiol. 54:1985;651-667.
38. Okada Y., Tanenbaum R., Williamson S.J., Kaufman L. Somatotopic organization of the human somatosensory cortex revealed by neuromagnetic measurements. Exp. Brain Res. 56:1984;197-205.
39. O'Mara S., Rowe M.J., Travin R.P.C. Neural mechanisms in vibrotactile adaptation. J. Neurophysiol. 59:1988;607-622.
40. Perrin F., Bertrand O., Pernier J. Scalp current density mapping: value and estimation from potential data. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 34:1987;283-288.
41. Pons T.P., Wall J.T., Garraghty P.E., Cusick C.G., Kaas J.H. Consistent features of the representation of the hand in area 3b of Macaque monkeys. Somatosens. Res. 4:1987;309-331.
42. D. Regan, Human Brain Electrophysiology: Evoked Potentials and Evoked Magnetic Fields in Science and Medicine, Elsevier, New York, 1989.
43. Regan D., Beverly K.I. Spatial frequency discrimination and detection: comparison of postadaptation thresholds. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 73:1983;1684-1690.
44. Regan D., Beverly K.I. Postadaptation orientation discrimination. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A. 2:1985;147-155.
45. Schimmel H. The (±) reference: accuracy of estimated mean components in average response studies. Science. 157:1967;92-94.
46. S. Siegel, Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1956.
47. Snyder A.Z. Steady-state vibration evoked responses: description of technique and characterization of responses. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 84:1992;257-268.
48. Talbot W.H., Darian-Smith I., Kornhuber H.H., Mountcastle V.B. The sense of flutter-vibration: comparison of the human capacity with response patterns of mechanoreceptive afferents from the monkey hand. J. Neurophysiol. 31:1968;301-334.
49. Tomberg C., Desmedt J.E., Ozaki I. Right or left ear reference changes the voltage of frontal and parietal somatosensory evoked potentials. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 80:1991;504-512.
50. Tommerdahl M., Delemos K.A., Vierck C.J., Favorov O.V., Whitsel B.L. Anterior parietal cortical response to tactile and skin-heating stimuli applied to the same skin site. J. Neurophysiol. 75:1996;2662-2670.
51. M. Tommerdahl, B. Whitsel, Optical imaging of intrinsic signals in somatosensory cortex, in: O. Franzen, R. Johansson, L. Terenius (Eds.), Somesthesis and the Neurobiology of the Somatosensory Cortex, Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, 1996, pp. 369-384.
52. Torebjörk H.E., Vallbo Å.B., Ochoa J.L. Intraneural microstimulation in man. Its relation to specificity of tactile sensations. Brain. 110:1987;1509-1529.
53. R.T. Verillo, A duplex mechanism of mechanoreception, in: D.R. Kenshalo (Ed.), The Skin Senses, Thomas, Springfield, IL, 1968, pp. 139-159.
54. Wall P.D., McMahon S.B. Microneurography and its relation to perceived sensation. A critical review. Pain. 21:1985;209-229.
55. B.L. Whitsel, O.V Favorov, M. Tommerdahl, M.E. Diamond, S.L. Juliano, D.G. Kelly, Dynamic processes governing the somatosensory cortical response to natural stimulation, in: J.S. Lund (Ed.), Sensory Processing in the Mammalian Brain, Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 1989, pp. 84-116.
56. B.L. Whitsel, O. Favorov, D.G. Kelly, M. Tommerdahl, Mechanisms of dynamic peri- and inter-columnar interactions in somatosensory cortex: stimulus-specific contrast enhancement by NMDA receptor activation, in: O. Franzen, J. Westman (Eds.), Information Processing in the Somatosensory System, Stockton, New York, 1991, pp. 353-370.
57. Wikswo J.P. Jr., Gevins A., Williamson S.J. The future of the EEG and MEG. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 87:1993;1-9.
58. Wood C.C. Application of dipole localization methods to source identification of human evoked patientials. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 338:1982;139-155.