Situation-adaptive autonomy for time-critical takeoff decisions

International Journal of Modelling and Simulation

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 175-180

  Inagaki, Toshiyuki ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TSUKUBA   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AIRCRAFT ACCIDENTS; AIRCRAFT ENGINES; ALARM SYSTEMS; AUTOMATION; DECISION MAKING; PROBABILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; TAKEOFF; USER INTERFACES;

ENGINE FAILURE; HUMAN CENTERED AUTOMATION; REJECTED TAKEOFFS;

MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

EID: 0034475992     PISSN: 02286203     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02286203.2000.11442155     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Boeing, Statistical summary of commercial jet aircraft accidents, 1995.
2. NTSB, Special investigation report: Runway overruns following high speed rejected tateoffs, SIR-90/02, 1990.
3. FAA, Takeoff safety training aid, 1992.
4. J. Lee & N. Moray, Trust, control strategies and allocation of function in human-machine systems, Ergonomics, 35(10), 1992, 1243-1270.
5. R. Parasuraman, R. Molloy, & I.L. Singh, Performance consequences of automation induced complacency, Int. J. Aviation Psychology, 3(1), 1993, 1-23.
6. C.D. Wickens, Designing for situation awareness and trust in automation, Proc. IFAC Integrated Systems Engineering, 1994, 77-82.
7. N. Sarter & D.D. Woods, Autonomy, authority, and observability: Properties of advanced automation and their impact on human-machine coordination, IFAC Int. Symposium on Analysis, Design and Evaluation of Man-Machine Systems, 1995, 149-152.
8. T.B. Sheridan, Telerobotics, automation, and human supervisory control (MIT Press, 1992).
9. D.D. Woods, The effects of automation on human's role: Experience from non-aviation industries, in Norman and Orlady (eds.), Flight Deck Automation: Promises and Realities, NASA CP-10036, 1989, 61-85.
10. E.L. Wiener, Human factors of advanced technology ('glass cockpit') transport aircraft, NASA TR-177528, 1989.
11. C.E. Billings, Human-centered aircraft automations, NASA TM-103885, 1991.
12. C.E. Billings, Aviation automation: The search for a human-centered approach (LEA, 1997).
13. F. Freuhauf, Lufthansa go/no go philosophy, Proc. 40th FSF Annual International Air Safety Seminar on Human Factors and Risk Management in Advanced Technology, October 26-29,1987, Tokyo, Japan, 438-442.
14. R.O. Besco, To go or not to go: That is the question improving abort/takeoff decision, Proc. 40th FSF Annual International Air Safety Seminar on Human Factors and Risk Management in Advanced Technology, October 26-29,1987, Tokyo, Japan, 430-137.
15. A. Ishibashi, The critical seconds for making appropriate decisions during takeoff: A pilot's point of view, Proc. 40th. FSF Annual International Air Safety Seminar on Human Factors and Risk Management in Advanced Technology, October 26-29,1987, Tokyo, Japan, 447-449.
16. R.W. Chamberlin, Rejected takeoffs: Causes, problems, and consequences, Proc. Int. Symposium on Aviation Psychology, 1991, 993-998.
17. T. Inagaki, Situation-adaptive responsibility allocation for human-centered automation, Trans. SICE of Japan, 31(3), 1995, 292-298.
18. T. Inagaki & M. Itoh, Trust, autonomy, and authority in human-machine systems: Situation-adaptive coordination for systems safety, Proc. Cognitive Systems Engineering for Process Control, 1996, 176-183.
19. T. Inagaki, Situation-adaptive autonomy: Trading control of authority in human-machine systems, Proc. 3rd Automation Technology and Human Performance Conf., Norfolk, USA, 1998 (to appear).
20. T. Inagaki, N. Moray, & M. Itoh, Trust, self-confidence and authority in human-machine systems, IFAC Int. Symposium on Analysis, Design and Evaluation of Man-Machine Systems, Kyoto, Japan, 1998 (to appear).
21. T. Inagaki & M. Itoh, Situation-adaptive autonomy: The potential for improving takeoff safety, Proc. 6th IEEE Int. Workshop on Robot and Human Communication, Sendai, Japan, 1997, 302-307.