Paradoxical facilitation of object recognition memory after infusion of scopolamine into perirhinal cortex: Implications for cholinergic system function

Journal of Neuroscience

Volumn 26, Issue 37, 2006, Pages 9520-9529

  Winters, Boyer D ^a   Saksida, Lisa M ^a   Bussey, Timothy J ^a  

^a UK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Acquisition; Consolidation; Declarative memory; Interference; Muscarinic; Rat

Indexed keywords

ACETYLCHOLINE; SCOPOLAMINE; SODIUM CHLORIDE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BRAIN CORTEX; CHOLINERGIC SYSTEM; CONTROLLED STUDY; MALE; MEMORY; MEMORY CONSOLIDATION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; RECOGNITION; STIMULUS;

ACETYLCHOLINE; ANIMALS; CHOLINERGIC FIBERS; MALE; MUSCARINIC ANTAGONISTS; NEURAL PATHWAYS; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PARAHIPPOCAMPAL GYRUS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; RATS; RECEPTORS, MUSCARINIC; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SCOPOLAMINE;

EID: 33748686783     PISSN: 02706474     EISSN: 02706474     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2319-06.2006     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Abe H, Ishida Y, Iwasaki T (2004) Perirhinal N-methyl-D-aspartate and muscarinic systems participate in object recognition in rats. Neurosci Lett 356:191-194.
2. Aigner TG, Mishkin M (1986) The effects of physostigmine and scopolamine on recognition memory in monkeys. Behav Neural Biol 45:81-87.
3. Aigner TG, Walker DL, Mishkin M (1991) Comparison of the effects of scopolamine administered before and after acquisition in a test of visual recognition memory in monkeys. Behav Neural Biol 55:61-67.
4. Bartus RT (2000) On neurodegenerative diseases, models, and treatment strategies: lessons learned and lessons forgotten a generation following the cholinergic hypothesis. Exp Neurol 163:495-529.
5. Bartus RT, Dean RL, Pontecorvo MJ, Flicker C (1985) The cholinergic hypothesis: a historical overview, current perspective, and future directions. Ann NY Acad Sci 444:332-358.
6. Bashir ZI (2003) On long-term depression induced by activation of G-protein coupled receptors. Neurosci Res 45:363-367.
7. Bianchin M, Mello e Souza T, Medina JH, Izquierdo I (1999) The amygdala is involved in the modulation of long-term memory, but not in working or short-term memory. Neurobiol Learn Mem 71:127-131.
8. Bucci DJ, Holland PC, Gallagher M (1998) Removal of cholinergic input to rat posterior parietal cortex disrupts incremental processing of conditioned stimuli. J Neurosci 18:8038-8046.
9. Buffalo EA, Reber PJ, Squire LR (1998) The human perirhinal cortex and recognition memory. Hippocampus 8:330-339.
10. Burwell RD (2001) Borders and cytoarchitecture of the perirhinal and postrhinal cortices in the rat. J Comp Neurol 437:17-41.
11. Chiba AA, Bucci DJ, Holland PC, Gallagher M (1995) Basal forebrain cholinergic lesions disrupt increments but not decrements in conditioned stimulus processing. J Neurosci 15:7315-7322.
12. Dodart JC, Mathis C, Ungerer A (1997) Scopolamine-induced deficits in a two-trial object recognition task in mice. NeuroReport 8:1173-1178.
13. Ennaceur A, Delacour J (1988) A new one-trial test for neurobiological studies of memory in rats. I: Behavioral data. Behav Brain Res 31:47-59.
14. Ennaceur A, Meliani K (1992) Effects of physostigmine and scopolamine on rats' performances in object-recognition and radial-maze tests. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 109:321-330.
15. Everitt BJ, Robbins TW (1997) Central cholinergic systems and cognition. Annu Rev Psychol 48:649-684.
16. Farr SA, Uezu K, Creonte TA, Flood JF, Morley JE (2000) Modulation of memory processing in the cingulate cortex of mice. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 65:363-368.
17. Forwood SE, Winters BD, Bussey TJ (2005) Hippocampal lesions that abolish spatial maze performance spare object recognition memory at delays of up to 48 hours. Hippocampus 15:347-355.
18. Furey ML, Pietrini P, Haxby JV, Alexander GE, Lee HC, VanMeter J, Grady CL, Shetty U, Rapoport SI, Schapiro MB, Freo U (1997) Cholinergic stimulation alters performance and task-specific regional cerebral blood flow during working memory. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:6512-6516.
19. Furey ML, Pietrini P, Haxby JV (2000) Cholinergic enhancement and increased selectivity of perceptual processing during working memory. Science 290:2315-2319.
20. Gais S, Born J (2004a) Low acetylcholine during slow-wave sleep is critical for declarative memory consolidation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:2140-2144.
21. Gais S, Born J (2004b) Declarative memory consolidation: mechanisms acting during human sleep. Learn Mem 11:679-685.
22. Hasselmo ME (1999) Neuromodulation: acetylcholine and memory consolidation. Trends Cogn Sci 3:351-359.
23. Hasselmo ME, Bower JM (1993) Acetylcholine and memory. Trends Neurosci 16:218-222.
24. Hasselmo ME, McGaughy J (2004) High acetylcholine levels set circuit dynamics for attention and encoding and low acetylcholine levels set dynamics for consolidation. Prog Brain Res 145:207-231.
25. Huston AE, Aggleton JP (1987) The effects of cholinergic drugs upon recognition memory in rats. Q J Exp Psychol B 39:297-314.
26. Krnjevic K, Phillis JW (1963) Acetylcholine-sensitive cells in the cerebral cortex. J Physiol 166:296-327.
27. Manns JR, Stark CE, Squire LR (2000) The visual paired-comparison task as a measure of declarative memory. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:12375-12379.
28. Massey PV, Bhabra G, Cho K, Brown MW, Bashir ZI (2001) Activation of muscarinic receptors induces protein synthesis-dependent long-lasting depression in the perirhinal cortex. Eur J Neurosci 14:145-152.
29. McGaughy J, Koene RA, Eichenbaum H, Hasselmo ME (2005) Cholinergic deafferentation of the entorhinal cortex in rats impairs encoding of novel but not familiar stimuli in a delayed nonmatch-to-sample task. J Neurosci 25:10273-10281.
30. Meunier M, Bachevalier J, Mishkin M, Murray EA (1993) Effects on visual recognition of combined and separate ablations of the entorhinal and perirhinal cortex in rhesus monkeys. J Neurosci 13:5418-5432.
31. Morris RG, Kopelman MD (1986) The memory deficits in Alzheimer-type dementia: a review. Q J Exp Psychol A 38:575-602.
32. Mumby DG, Pinel JP (1994) Rhinal cortex lesions and object recognition in rats. Behav Neurosci 108:11-18.
33. Murphy PC, Sillito AM (1991) Cholinergic enhancement of direction selectivity in the visual cortex of the cat. Neuroscience 40:13-20.
34. Okuda S, Roozendaal B, McGaugh JL (2004) Glucocorticoid effects on object recognition memory require training-associated emotional arousal. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:853-858.
35. Paxinos G, Watson C (1997) The rat brain in stereotaxic coordinates, Ed 3. London: Academic.
36. Perry EK, Tomlinson BE, Blessed G, Bergmann K, Gibson PH, Perry RH (1978) Correlation of cholinergic abnormalities with senile plaques and mental test scores in senile dementia. Br Med J 2:1457-1459.
37. Power AE, McGaugh JL (2002) Phthalic acid amygdalopetal lesion of the nucleus basalis magnocellularis induces reversible memory deficits in rats. Neurobiol Learn Mem 77:372-388.
38. Power AE, Vazdarjanova A, McGaugh JL (2003) Muscarinic cholinergic influences in memory consolidation. Neurobiol Learn Mem 80:178-193.
39. Rasmusson DD (2000) The role of acetylcholine in cortical synaptic plasticity. Behav Brain Res 115:205-218.
40. Rudy JW (1996) Scopolamine administered before and after training impairs both contextual and auditory-cue fear conditioning. Neurobiol Learn Mem 65:73-81.
41. Sarter M, Bruno JP (1997) Cognitive functions of cortical acetylcholine: toward a unifying hypothesis. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 23:28-46.
42. Sarter M, Bruno JP, Givens B (2003) Attentional functions of cortical cholinergic inputs: what does it mean for learning and memory? Neurobiol Learn Mem 80:245-256.
43. Schon K, Atri A, Hasselmo ME, Tricarico MD, LoPresti ML, Stern CE (2005) Scopolamine reduces persistent activity related to long-term encoding in the parahippocampal gyrus during delayed matching in humans. J Neurosci 25:9112-9123.
44. Schroeder JP, Packard MG (2002) Posttraining intra-basolateral amygdala scopolamine impairs food- and amphetamine-induced conditioned place preferences. Behav Neurosci 116:922-927.
45. Sillito AM, Kemp JA (1983) Cholinergic modulation of the functional organization of the cat visual cortex. Brain Res 289:143-155.
46. Tang Y, Mishkin M, Aigner TG (1997) Effects of muscarinic blockade in perirhinal cortex during visual recognition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:12667-12669.
47. Turchi J, Saunders RC, Mishkin M (2005) Effects of cholinergic deafferentation of the rhinal cortex on visual recognition memory in monkeys. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:2158-2161.
48. Vazdarjanova A, McGaugh JL (1999) Basolateral amygdala is involved in modulating consolidation of memory for classical fear conditioning. J Neurosci 19:6615-6622.
49. Warburton EC, Koder T, Cho K, Massey PV, Duguid G, Barker GR, Aggleton JP, Bashir ZI, Brown MW (2003) Cholinergic neurotransmission is essential for perirhinal cortical plasticity and recognition memory. Neuron 38:987-996.
50. Weinberger NM (2003) The nucleus basalis and memory codes: auditory cortical plasticity and the induction of specific, associative behavioral memory. Neurobiol Learn Mem 80:268-284.
51. Winters BD, Bussey TJ (2005a) Transient inactivation of perirhinal cortex disrupts encoding, retrieval, and consolidation of object recognition memory. J Neurosci 25:52-61.
52. Winters BD, Bussey TJ (2005b) Removal of cholinergic input to perirhinal cortex disrupts object recognition but not spatial working memory in the rat. Eur J Neurosci 21:2263-2270.
53. Winters BD, Bussey TJ (2005c) Glutamate receptors in perirhinal cortex mediate encoding, retrieval, and consolidation of object recognition memory. J Neurosci 25:4243-4251.
54. Winters BD, Forwood SE, Cowell RA, Saksida LM, Bussey TJ (2004) Double dissociation between the effects of peri-postrhinal cortex and hippocampal lesions on tests of object recognition and spatial memory: heterogeneity of function within the temporal lobe. J Neurosci 24:5901-5908.
55. Wixted JT (2004) The psychology and neuroscience of forgetting. Annu Rev Psychol 55:235-269.
56. Young SL, Bohenek DL, Fanselow MS (1995) Scopolamine impairs acquisition and facilitates consolidation of fear conditioning: differential effects for tone vs context conditioning. Neurobiol Learn Mem 63:174-180.
57. Zola-Morgan S, Squire LR, Amaral DG, Suzuki WA (1989) Lesions of perirhinal and parahippocampal cortex that spare the amygdala and hippocampal formation produce severe memory impairment. J Neurosci 9:4355-4370.