Large wood addition for aquatic habitat rehabilitation in an incised, sand-bed stream, Little Topashaw Creek, Mississippi

River Research and Applications

Volumn 22, Issue 7, 2006, Pages 803-817

  Shields Jr , F Douglas ^a   Knight, Scott S ^a   Stofleth, John M ^b  

^a USDA ARS NATIONAL SEDIMENTATION LABORATORY   (United States)

^b Philip Williams & Associates Ltd   (United States)

Author keywords

Erosion; Fish; Large woody debris; Physical habitat; Sediment; Stream restoration

Indexed keywords

AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM; COMMUNITY COMPOSITION; EROSION CONTROL; FISH; HABITAT RESTORATION; STREAM; WOOD;

LITTLE TOPASHAW CREEK; MISSISSIPPI; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

SALIX;

EID: 33748674066     PISSN: 15351459     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/rra.937     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Abbe TB, Brooks AP, Montgomery DR, Fisher S. 2003. Wood in river rehabilitation and management. In The Ecology and Management of Wood in World Rivers, Gregory SV, Boyer KL, Gurnell AM (eds). American Fisheries Society: Symposium 37, Bethesda, MD; 367-389.
2. Adams SB, Warren ML, Hagg W. 2004. Spatial and temporal patterns in fish assemblages of upper coastal plain streams, Mississippi, USA. Hydrobiologia 528: 45-61.
3. Alonso CA, Shields FD Jr, Temple DM. 2005. Experimental Study of Drag and Lift Forces on Prototype-Scale Models of Large Wood. Proceedings of the 2005 World Water and Environmental Resources Congress: Impacts of global climate change. American Society of Civil Engineers: Reston, VA.
4. Angermeier PL, Karr JR. 1984. Relationships between woody debris and fish habitat in a small warmwater stream. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113: 716-726.
5. Benke AC, Henry RL III, Gillespie DM, Hunter RJ. 1985. Importance of snag habitat for animal production in southeastern streams. Fisheries 10(5): 8-13.
6. Bilby RE, Likens GE. 1980. Importance of organic debris dams in the structure and function of stream ecosystems. Ecology 61(5): 1107-1113.
7. Bond NR, Lake PS. 2005. Ecological restoration and large-scale ecological disturbance: the effects of drought on the response by fish to a habitat restoration experiment. Restoration Ecology 13(1): 39-48.
8. Braudrick CA, Grant EG. 2000. When do logs move in rivers? Water Resources Research 36(2): 571-583.
9. Brooks AP, Brierley GJ. 2002. Mediated equilibrium: The influence of riparian vegetation and wood on the long term character and behaviour of a near pristine river. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 27: 343-367.
10. Brooks AP, Abbe TB, Jansen JD, Taylor M, Gippel CJ. 2001. Putting the wood back into our rivers: an experiment in river rehabilitation. In Proceedings of the 3rd Australian Stream Management Conference, Rutherfurd I, Sheldon F, Brierley G, Kenyon C (eds). Brisbane, 27-29 August 2001, pp. 73-80.
11. Brookshire ENJ, Dwire KA. 2003. Controls on patterns of coarse organic particle retention in headwater streams. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 22(1): 17-34.
12. Cooper CM, Testa S. 1999. Examination of revised rapid bioassessment protocols in a watershed disturbed by channel incision. Bulletin of the North American Benthological Society 16(1): 198.
13. Crook DA, Robertson AI. 1999. Relationships between riverine fish and woody debris: implications for lowland rivers. Marine and Freshwater Research 50: 941-953.
14. D'Aoust SG, Millar RG. 2000. Stability of Ballasted Woody Debris Habitat Structures. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 126(11): 810-817.
15. Darby SE, Simon A. 1999. Incised River Channels: Processes, Forms, Engineering and Management. John Wiley & Sons: Chichester.
16. Derrick DL. 1997. Harland Creek Bendway Weir/Willow Post Bank Stabilization Demonstration Project. Management of Landscapes Disturbed by Channel Incision 351-356.
17. Dolloff AC, Warren ML Jr. 2003. Fish relationships with large wood in small streams. In The Ecology and Management of Wood in World Rivers, Gregory SV, Boyer KL, Gurnell AM (eds). American Fisheries Society: Symposium 37: Bethesda, MD; 179-193.
18. Downs PW, Simon A. 2001. Fluvial geomorphological analysis of the recruitment of large woody debris in the Yalobusha River network, Central Mississippi, USA. Geomorphology 37: 65-91.
19. Doyle MW, Shields FD Jr. 1998. Perturbations of stage hydrographs caused by channelization and incision. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Water Resources Engineering, Abt SR, Young-Pezeshk J, Watson CC (eds). American Society of Civil Engineers: New York; 736-741.
20. Gerhard M, Reich M. 2000. Restoration of stream with large wood: effects of accumulated and built-in wood on channel morphology, habitat diversity and aquatic fauna. Internat. Rev. Hydrobiol 85: 123-137.
21. Gippel CJ, O'Neill IC, Finlayson BL, Schnatz I. 1996. Hydraulic guidelines for the re-introduction and management of large woody debris in lowland rivers. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 12: 223-236.
22. Glantz SA. 1992. Primer of Biostatistics. 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill: New York, New York; Incorporated, Health Professions Division.
23. Gurnell AM, Pens GE, Harris N, Ward JV, Tockner K, Edwards PJ, Kollmann J. 2000. Large wood retention in channels: the case of the Fiume Tagliamento, Italy. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 25(3): 255-275.
24. Jacobson PJ, Jacobson KM, Angermeier PL, Cherry DS. 1999. Transport, retention, and ecological significance of woody debris within a large ephemeral river. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 18(4): 429-444.
25. Johnson DL, Beaumier RA, Lynch WE Jr. 1988. Selection of habitat structure interstice size by bluegills and largemouth bass in ponds. American Fisheries Society 117: 171-179.
26. Johnson PA, Hey RD, Tessier M, Rosgen DL. 2001. Use of vanes for control of scour at vertical wall abutments. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 127(9): 772-778.
27. Karr JR, Allan JD, Benke AC. 2000. River conservation in the United States and Canada. In Global Perspectives on River Conservation: Science, Policy and Practice, Boon PJ, Davies BR, Petts GE (eds). John Wiley and Sons Ltd.
28. Martin LT, Pezeshki SR, Shields FD Jr. 2005. Soaking treatment increases survival of black willow posts in a large-scale field study. Ecological Restoration 23(2): 95-98.
29. Matthews WJ. 1987. Physicochemical tolerance and selectivity of stream fishes as related to their geographic ranges and local distribution. In Community and Evolutionary Ecology of North American Stream Fishes, Matthews WJ, Heins DC (eds). University of Oklahoma Press: Norman; 111-120.
30. Matthews WJ, Cashner RC, Gelwick FP. 1988. Stability and persistence of fish faunas and assemblages in three midwestern streams. Copeia 947-957.
31. McMahon TE, Hartman GF. 1989. Influence of cover complexity and current velocity on winter habitat use by juvenile coho salmon (Oncorhynchus Kisutch). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 46: 1551-1557.
32. McMahon TE, Terrell JW. 1982. Habitat suitability index models: Channel catfish. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fisheries and Wildlife Service. FWS/OBS-82/10/2, 29 pp.
33. Petersen MS. 1986. River Engineering. Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
34. Pezeshki SR, Li S, Shields FD Jr, Martin LT. Submitted. Factors governing survival of black willow (Salix nigra) cuttings in a field restoration project. Ecological Engineering.
35. Reich M, Kershner JL, Wildman RC. 2003. Restoring streams with large wood: a synthesis. In The Ecology and Management of Wood in World Rivers, Gregory SV, Boyer KL, Gurnell AM (eds). American Fisheries Society: Symposium 37: Bethesda, MD; 355-366.
36. Ricciardi A, Rasmussen JB. 1999. Extinction rates of North American freshwater fauna. Conservation of Biology 13(5): 1220-1222.
37. Ries KGIII, Crouse MY. 2002. The National Flood Frequency Program, Version 3.0: A Computer Program for Estimating Magnitude and Frequency of Floods for Ungaged Sites, 2002: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 02-4168, 42 pp.
38. Roni P, Beechie TJ, Bilby RE, Leonetti FE, Pollock MM, Pess GR. 2002. A review of stream restoration techniques and a hierarchical strategy for prioritizing restoration in Pacific northwest watersheds. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 22: 1-20.
39. Schlosser IJ. 1987. A Conceptual Framework for Fish Communities in Small Warmwater Streams. In Community and Evolutionary Ecology of North American Stream Fishes. Matthews WJ, Heins DC (eds). University of Oklahoma: Norman, Oklahoma and London.
40. Scott MC, Angermeier PL. 1998. Resource use by two sympatric black basses in impounded and riverine sections of the New River, Virginia. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 18(2): 221-235.
41. Shields FD Jr, Gippel CJ. 1995. Prediction of effects of woody debris removal on flow resistance. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 121(4): 341-354.
42. Shields FD Jr, Smith RH. 1992. Effects of large woody debris removal on physical characteristics of a sand-bed river. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 2: 145-163.
43. Shields FD Jr, Knight SS, Cooper CM. 1994. Effects of channel incision on base flow stream habitats and fishes. Environmental Management 18(1): 43-57.
44. Shields FD Jr, Knight SS, Cooper CM. 1995. Rehabilitation of watersheds with incising channels in Mississippi. Water Resources Bulletin 31(6): 971-982.
45. Shields FD Jr, Knight SS, Cooper CM. 1998. Rehabilitation of aquatic habitats in warmwater streams damaged by channel incision in Mississippi. Hydrobiologia 382: 63-86.
46. Shields FD, Jr, Knight SS, Cooper CM. 2000. Cyclic perturbation of lowland river channels and ecological responses. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 16(4): 307-325.
47. Shields FD Jr, Morin N, Kuhnle RA. 2001. Effects of large woody debris structures on stream hydraulics. In Proceedings of the 2001 Wetlands Engineering and River Restoration Conference, Hayes DF (ed.). American Society of Civil Engineers: Reston, VA; CD-ROM.
48. Shields FD Jr, Morin N, Cooper CM. 2004. Large woody debris structures for sand bed channels. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 130(3): 208-217.
49. Simon A. 1989. A model of channel response in disturbed alluvial channels. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 14(1): 11-26.
50. Simon A, Darby SE. 1999. The nature and significance of incised river channels. In Incised River Channels: Processes, Forms, Engineering and Management. Darby SE, Simon A (eds). John Wiley and Sons: Chichester; 3-18.
51. Simon A, Rinaldi M, Hadish G. 1996. Channel evolution in the loess area of the midwestern United States. Proceedings of 6th Federal Interagency Sedimentation Conference I(III): 86-93.
52. Stofleth JM, Shields FD Jr, Fox GA. 2004. Organic carbon concentrations in hyporheic zone sediments: a tool for measuring stream integrity. In Proceedings of the 2004 World Water and Environmental Resources Congress, Sehlke G, Hayes DF, Stevens DK (eds). Critical transitions in Water and Environmental Resources. American Society of Civil Engineers: Reston, VA; CD-ROM.
53. Stuber RJ, Gebhart G, Maughan OE. 1982. Habitat suitability index models: largemouth bass. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fisheries and Wildlife Service. FWS/OBS-82/10.16, 32 pp.
54. Thevenet A, Statzner B. 1999. Linking fluvial fish community to physical habitat in large woody debris: sampling effort, accuracy and precision. Arch. Hydrobiol. 145(1): 57-77.
55. U. S. Army Corps of Engineers. 1991. Engineering and Design: Hydraulic Design of Flood Control Channels. Engineer Manual Number 1110-21601, EM 1110-2-1601, CECW-EH-D. Washington, D.C.: Department of the Army, U. S. Army Corps of Engineers.
56. Wallerstein NP, Alonso CV, Bennett SJ, Thorne CR. 2001. Distorted Froude-scaled flume analysis of large woody debris. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 26: 1265-1283.
57. Warren ML Jr, Burr BM, Walsh SJ, Bart HL Jr, Cashner RC, Etnier DA, Freeman BJ, Kuhajda BR, Mayden RL, Robison HW, Ross ST, Starnes WC. 2000. Diversity, distribution, and conservation status of the native freshwater fishes of the southern United States. Fisheries 24(10): 7-29.
58. Warren ML Jr, Haag WR, Adams SB. 2002. Forest linkages to diversity and abundance in lowland stream fish communities. In Proceedings of a conference on Sustainability of Wetland and Water Resources, Holland MM, Stanturf JA, Warren ML Jr (eds), May 23-25, 2000, University of Mississippi: Oxford; USDA Forest Service, General Technical Report SRS-50, pp. 168-182.
59. Webb PW, de Buffrenil V. 1990. Locomotion in the biology of large aquatic vertebrates. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 119: 629-641.
60. White RJ. 1996. Growth and development of North American stream habitat management for fish. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 53(1): 342-363.
61. Wichert GA, Rapport DJ. 1998. Fish community structure as a measure of degradation and rehabilitation of riparian systems in an agricultural drainage basin. Environmental Management, 22(3): 425-443.
62. Zika U, Peter A. 2002. The introduction of woody debris into a channelized stream: effect on trout populations and habitat. River Research and Applications 18: 355-366.