The effect that the visual and haptic problems associated with touching a projection augmented model have on object-presence

Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 419-437

  Bennett, Emily ^a   Stevens, Brett ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PORTSMOUTH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33748657374     PISSN: 10547460     EISSN: 15313263     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/pres.15.4.419     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. Bennett, E., & Stevens, B. (2005). The effect that touching a projection augmented model has on object-presence. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Information Visualization, 790-795.
2. Bennett, E., & Stevens, B. (2004). Does touching a projection augmented model and interacting with it using a spatially-coincident device, affect a user's perception of its size? Australian Journal of Information Systems, 133-146.
3. Bilingshurst, M., Grasset, R., & Looser, J. (2005). Designing augmented reality interfaces. Proceedings of SIGGRAPH Conference, 39(1), 17-22.
4. Bimber, O., Emmerling, A., & Kelmmer, T. (2005). Embedded entertainment with smart projectors. IEEE Computer, 38(1), 48-55.
5. Brenton, H., Gillies, M., Ballin, D., & Chatting, D. (2005). The uncanny valley: Does it exist and is it related to presence? Proceedings of British HCI Group Annual Conference: Human-Animated Characters Interaction Workshop. Available from http://www.dcs.shef.ac.uk/cogsys/workshop/ HarryBrenton_H-ACI2005.pdf.
6. Brunner, E., & Puri, M. L. (2001). Nonparametric methods in factorial designs. Statistical Papers, 42, 1-52.
7. Conover, W., & Iman, R. (1981). Rank transformations as a bridge between parametric and nonparametric statistics. American Statistician, 35, 124-129.
8. Ernst, M., & Bülthoff, H. (2004). Merging the senses into a robust percept. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 8(4), 162-169.
9. Greer, T., & Dunlap, W. (1997). Analysis of variance with ipsative measures. Psychological Methods, 2, 200-207.
10. Gutierrez, D., Anson, O., Seron, E., Sundstedt, V., & Chalmers, A. (2005). Efficient physically-based perceptual rendering of participating media. Proceedings of SIGGRAPH Conference.
11. Hoffman, H., Garcia-Palacios, A., Carlin, A., Furness, T., & Botella-Arbona, C. (2003). Interfaces that heal: Coupling real and virtual objects to treat spider phobia. International Journal of Human Computer Interaction, 16(2), 283-300.
12. Kajimoto, H., Kawakami, N., Tachi, S., & Inami, M. (2004). SmartTouch: Electric skin to touch the untouchable. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 24(1), 36-42.
13. Klatzky, R., & Lederman, S. (2003). Touch. In A. Healy and R. Proctor (Eds.), Handbook of Psychology, Volume 4: Experimental Psychology (pp. 147-176). New York: Wiley.
14. Klatzky, R., Lederman, S., & Matula, D. (1993). Haptic exploration in the presence of vision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19(4), 729-743.
15. Lécuyer, A., Burkhardt, J., & Etienne, L. (2004). Feeling bumps and holes without a haptic interface: The perception of pseudo-haptic textures. Proceedings of the ACM Conference in Human Factors in Computing Systems (ACM SIGCHI). 239-246.
16. Lederman, S., Summers, C., & Klatzky, R. (1996). Cognitive salience of haptic object properties: Role of modality-encoding bias. Perception, 25(8), 983-998.
17. Mack, A., & Rock, I. (2000). Inattentional blindness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18. Matkovic, K., Psik, T., Wagner, I., & Gracanin, D. (2005). Dynamic texturing of real objects in an augmented reality system. Proceedings of IEEE Virtual Reality Conference, 245-248.
19. McCall, R., O'Neil, S., Benyon, D., Smyth, M., & Carroll, F. (2004). A method for designing virtual places. Proceedings of International Presence Workshop, 305-312.
20. Mukaigawa, Y., Nishiyama, M., & Shakunaga, T. (2004). Virtual photometric environment using projector. Proceedings of International Conference on Virtual Systems and Multimedia, 544-553.
21. Naimark, M. (2005). Two unusual projection spaces. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments. 14(5), 597-606.
22. Nakatani, N., Kajimoto, H., Vlack, K., Sekiguchi, D., Kawakami, N., & Tachi, S. (2005). Control method for a 3D shape display with coil-type shape memory alloy. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 1344-1349.
23. Nam, T.-J. (2005). Sketch-based rapid prototyping platform for hardware-software integrated interactive products. Proceedings of CHI Conference, 1689-1692.
24. Omniglobe. (2004). Manufactured by Arc Science. Art Exhibit displayed at SIGGRAPH conference. Available from http://www.arcscience.com/omni.htm.
25. Peck, J., & Childers, T. (2003). To have and to hold: The influence of haptic information on product judgments. Journal of Marketing, 67, 35-48.
26. Raskar, R., Welch, G., Low, K., & Bandyopadhyay, D. (2001). Shader lamps: Animating real objects with image-based illuminations. Proceedings of Eurographics Workshop on Rendering, 89-102.
27. Ratti, C., Wang, Y., Biderman, A., Piper, B., & Ishii, H. (2004). Phoxel-space: An interface for exploring volumetric data with physical voxels. Proceeding of ACM DARE Conference, 289-296.
28. Reichardt, J. (1978). Robots: Fact, fiction and prediction. London: Thames and Hudson Ltd.
29. Spence, C., & Driver, J. (2004). Crossmodal space and crossmodal attention. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
30. Stevens, B., Jerrams-Smith, J., Heathcote, D., & Callear, D. (2002). Putting the virtual into reality: Assessing object-presence with projection-augmented models. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 11(1), 79-92.
31. Summet, J., Abowd, G., Corso, G., & Rehg, J. (2005). Virmal rear projection: Do shadows matter? Proceedings of CHI Conference, 1997-2000.
32. Takamori, K. (2005). SpaceRelighter: The removal of the dynamic shadows in a projector based environmental reappearance illumination system. Proceedings of Image Recognition & Understanding Symposium, 1517-1522.
33. Taylor, M., Lederman, S., & Gibson, R. (1973). Tactual perception of texture. In E. Carterette & M. Friedman (Eds.), Handbook of perception (Vol. 3): Biology of perceptual systems. New York: Academic Press.
34. Verlinden, J., Kooijman, A., Edelenbos, E., & Go, C. (2005). Investigation on the use of illuminated clay in automotive styling. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Computer-Aided Industrial Design & Conceptual Design. Available from http://dutocg.io.tudelft.nl/~jouke/ ipvpictures/phd_overview/pub/caicd2005verlinden.pdf.