The effect that touching a projection augmented model has on object-presence

Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Visualisation

Volumn 2005, Issue , 2005, Pages 790-795

  Bennett, Emily ^a   Stevens, Brett ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PORTSMOUTH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SYSTEMS; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

COMPUTER GENERATED INFORMATION; COMPUTER IMAGE; REAL PHYSICAL MODEL;

VIRTUAL REALITY;

EID: 33748650345     PISSN: 10939547     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/IV.2005.124     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. B. Stevens, J. Jerrams-Smith, D. Heathcote, and D. Callear, Putting the Virtual into Reality: Assessing Object-Presence with Projection-Augmented Models. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments. MIT Press, 11 (1), 79-92, 2002.
2. E. Bennett, and B. Stevens, PARIS; Interacting with a Projection Augmented model using a mouse and a Tangible User Interface, In Proceedings of British HCI group annual conference. 2004.
3. J. Verlinden, A. de Smit, A. Peeters, and M. van Gelderen. Development of a flexible augmented prototyping system, Journal of WSCG. 11(3). 2003
4. th Eurographics Workshop on Rendering. Springer, 2001.
5. T. Nam and W. Lee. Integrating hardware and software: augmented reality based prototyping method for digital products. In Proceedings of CHI. ACM Press, 957-957. 2003.
6. D. Clark, R. McKeon, R. Marciano, and M. Bailey. Rear-Projecting Virtual Data onto Physical Terrain; An Exercise in Two Senses Being Better Than One. In Proceedings of IEEE Visualization. 451-454. 1998.
7. C. Ratti, Y. Wang, H. Ishii, H. B. Piper and D. Frenchman. Tangible User Interfaces (TUIs): A Novel Paradigm for GIS. Transactions in Geographical Information Systems. 8, 4, 407-421. 2004.
8. C. Ratti, Y. Wang, A. Biderman, B. Piper and H Ishii. Phoxel-Space: an Interface for Exploring Volumetric Data with Physical Voxels. In Proceeding of Designing Interactive Systems. 2004.
9. D. Dietz, R. Raskar, S. Mihelic-Booth, J. van Baar, K. Wittenburg and B. Knep. Multi-Projectors and Implicit Interaction in Persuasive Public Displays. In Proceedings of Advanced Visual Interfaces. ACM Press, 209-217. 2004.
10. M. Grossberg, H. Peri, S. Nayer and P. Belhumeur. Making one object look like another: controlling appearance using a projector-camera system. In Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 452-259, 2004.
11. H. Zhu and W. Book. Speed control and position estimation of small hydraulic cylinders for Digital Clay, In Proceedings of Symposium of Flexible Automation.2004.
12. H. Iwata, F. Yano, R. Nakaizumi and Kawamura. Project FEELEX: Adding Haptic Surface to Graphics. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH. ACM Press, 469-476. 2001
13. S. Hirooka and H. Saito. Virtual Display System Using Video Projector onto Real Object Surface, In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Artificial Reality and Telexistence. 305-310. 2004.
14. J. Lee, P. Dietz, D. Maynes-Aminzade, R. Raskar and S. Hudson. Automatic Projector Calibration with Embedded Light Sensors. In Proceedings of ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. 123-126. 2004.
15. M. Ernst and H. Bülthoff, Merging the senses into a robust percept. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. Elsevier, 8(4), 162-169. 2004.
16. J. Summet, G. Abowd, G. Corso, J. Rehg. Rear Projection: Do Shadows Matter? In Proceedings of CHI. 2005.
17. N. Sugano, H. Kato and K. Tachibana. The Effects of Shadow Representation of Virtual Objects in Augmented. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality. 2003.
18. H. Hoffman. A. Hollander, K. Schroder, S. Rousseau and T. Furness. Physically touching and tasting virtual objects enhances the realism of the virtual experiences, In Proceedings of IEEE Virtual Reality International Symposium. 1998.
19. B. Insko, M. Meehan, M. Whitton and F. Brooks. Passive haptics significantly enhances virtual environments. In Proceedings of International Workshop on Presence. 2001.
20. C. Borst and R. Volz. Preliminary report on a haptic feedback technique for basic interactions with a virtual control panel. In Proceedings of EuroHaptics. 1-13. 2003.
21. H. Ishii and B. Ullmer. Tangible Bits: Towards Seamless Interfaces between People, Bits and Atoms, In Proceedings of CHI. ACM Press, 234-241.1997.
22. E. Bennett and B. Stevens, B. The Effect that Haptically Perceiving a Projection Augmented Model has on the Perception of Size. In Proceedings of International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR). IEEE Press. 2004.
23. D. Nunez and D. Blake, The thematic baseline technique as a means of improving the sensitivity of presence self-report scales. In Proceedings of International Workshop on Presence. 2003.
24. P. Spector. Summated rating scale construction: An introduction, In M. Lewis-Beck (Eds.) Basic measurement: International handbook of quantitative applications in the social sciences - volume 4, Sage, 1994.
25. L. Grimm and P. Yarnold. Reading and understanding more multivarient statistics. American Psychological Association. 2000.
26. P. Milgram and F. Kishino. Taxonomy of Mixed Reality Visual Displays. IECE Transaction on Information and Systems (Special Issue on Networked Reality), vol, E77-D, 12, 1321-1329. 1994.