Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography

Journal of Digital Imaging

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 258-263

  Obenauer, Silvia ^a   Sohns, Christian ^a   Werner, Carola ^a   Grabbe, Eckhardt ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

ACR types; Breast density; Computer aided detection (CAD); Full field digital mammography

Indexed keywords

ACR TYPES; BREAST DENSITY; COMPUTER-AIDED DETECTION (CAD); FULL-FIELD DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY;

BIOLOGICAL ORGANS; HISTOLOGY; MAMMOGRAPHY; STATISTICAL TESTS; TISSUE; TUMORS;

COMPUTER AIDED DIAGNOSIS;

AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY; ARTICLE; BREAST CARCINOMA; CANCER CLASSIFICATION; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; DENSITY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DIGITAL IMAGING; EVALUATION; FULL FIELD DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGING SYSTEM; MAMMOGRAPHY; MCNEMAR TEST; MEDICAL SOCIETY; PARENCHYMA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

ADENOCARCINOMA; ADENOCARCINOMA, MUCINOUS; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CALCINOSIS; CARCINOMA, DUCTAL, BREAST; CARCINOMA, INTRADUCTAL, NONINFILTRATING; CARCINOMA, LOBULAR; CARCINOMA, MEDULLARY; CARCINOMA, PAPILLARY; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; GERMANY; HEMANGIOSARCOMA; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; NEOPLASM STAGING; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 33748627971     PISSN: 08971889     EISSN: 1618727X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10278-006-0592-x     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. M Moskowitz 1983 Screening for breast cancer: how effective are our test? A critical review CA Cancer J Clin 33 26 39
2. J Rennie R Rusting 1996 Making headway against cancer Sci Am 3 56 59
3. RE Bird 1990 Professional quality assurance for mammography screening programs Radiology 77 8 10
4. HP Chan K Doi CJ Vyborny RA Schmidt CE Metz KL Lam T Ogura YZ Wu H [tmp] MacMahon 1990 Improvement in radiologists' detection of clustered microcalcifications on mammograms. The potential of computer-aided diagnosis Invest Radiol 25 1102 1110
5. B Zheng YH Chang M Staiger W Good D Gur 1995 Computer-aided detection of clustered microcalcifications in digitized mammograms Acad Radiol 2 655 662
6. HP Chan B Sahiner MA Helvie N Petrick MA Roubidoux TE Wilson DD Adler C Paramagul JS Newman S Sanjay-Gopal 1999 Improvement of radiologists' characterization of mammographic masses by using computer-aided diagnosis: an ROC study Radiology 212 817 827
7. EL Thurfjell KA Lernevall AA Taube 1994 Benefit of independent double reading in a population-based mammography screening program Radiology 191 241 244
8. A Malich C Marx M Facius T Boehm M Fleck WA Kaiser 2001 Tumour detection rate of a new commercially available computer-aided detection system Eur Radiol 11 2454 2459
9. CJ Vyborny 1994 Can computers help radiologists read mammograms? Radiology 191 315 317
10. K Doi H [tmp] MacMahon S Katsuragawa RM Nishikawa Y Jiang 1999 Computer-aided diagnosis in radiology: potential and pitfalls Eur Radiol 31 97 109
11. M Funovics S Schamp TH Helbich B Lackner P Wunderbaldinger M Fuchsjäger G Lechner G Wolf 2001 Evaluation of a computer-assisted diagnosis system in breast carcinoma Röfo Fortschr Geb Röntgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 173 218 223
12. S Muller 1999 Full field digital mammography designed as a complete system Eur Radiol 31 25 34
13. U Bick 2000 Full-field digital mammography Röfo Fortschr Geb Röntgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 173 957 964
14. S Obenauer S Luftner-Nagel D von Heyden U Munzel F Baum E Grabbe 2002 Screen-film vs full-field digital mammography: image quality, detectability and characterization of lesions Eur Radiol 12 1697 1702
15. F Baum U Fischer S Obenauer E Grabbe 2002 Computer-aided detection in direct digital full-field mammography: initial results Eur Radiol 12 3015 3017
16. S Satija RH Moore JS Michalson 2000 Breast tissue patterns as a risk factor for developing cancer (abstract) Radiology 217 446
17. American College of Radiology (ACR) 1998 Illustrated breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) 3 American College of Radiology Reston, VA
18. MT Mandelson N Oestreicher PL Porter D White CA Finder SH Taplin E White 2000 Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers J Natl Cancer Inst 92 1081 1087
19. LJ Warren Burhenne SA Wood CJ D'Orsi SA Feig DB Kopans KF O'Shaughnessy EA Sickles L Tabar CJ Vyborny RA Castellino 2000 Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography Radiology 215 554 562
20. RF Brem J Baum M Lechner S Kaplan S Souders LG Naul J Hoffmeister 2003 Improvement in sensitivity of screening mammography with computer-aided detection: a multiinstitutional trial Am J Roentgenol 181 687 693
21. JA Baker EL Rosen JY Lo EI Gimenez R Walsh MS Soo 2003 Computer-aided detection (CAD) in screening mammography: sensitivity of commercial CAD systems for detecting architectural distortion Am J Roentgenol 181 1083 1088
22. WT Ho PW Lam 2003 Clinical performance of computer-assisted detection (CAD) system in detecting carcinoma in breasts of different densities Clin Radiol 58 133 136
23. RL Birdwell DM Ikeda KF O'Shaugnessy EA Sickles 2001 Mammographic characteristics of 115 missed cancers later detected with screening mammography and the potential utility of computer-aided detection Radiology 219 192 202
24. RF Brem JW Hoffmeister JA Rapelyea G Zisman K Mohtashemi G Jindal MP Disimio SK Rogers 2005 Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection for breast cancer Am J Roentgenol 184 439 444
25. A Malich DR Fischer M Facius A Petrovich J Boettcher C Marx A Hansch WA Kaiser 2005 Effect of breast density on computer aided detection J Digit Imaging 18 227 233