Full-field digital mammography designed as a complete system

European Journal of Radiology

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 25-34

  Muller, Serge ^a  

^a GE Medical Systems   (France)

Author keywords

Breast imaging; Digital mammography; Image quality

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED DIAGNOSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; ONCOLOGY; USER INTERFACES; X RAY RADIOGRAPHY;

BREAST CANCER; FULL FIELD DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY;

MAMMOGRAPHY;

BREAST CANCER; DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY; ELECTRONICS; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; MAMMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; X RAY;

EID: 0032779518     PISSN: 0720048X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0720-048X(99)00066-2     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Kerlikowske K., Grady D., Rubin S.M., Sandrock C., Ernster V.L. Efficacy of screening mammography. A meta-analysis. J Am Med Assoc. 274(5):1995;381-382.
2. Screening Mammography for Women Ages 40-49. 1998;NCI.
3. Burell H.C., Pinder S.E., Wilson A.R., Evans A.J., Yeoman L.J., Elston C.W., Ellis I.O. The positive predictive value of mammographic signs: a review of 425 nonpalpable breast lesions. Clin Radiol. 51(4):1996;277-281.
4. Tabar L., Dean P.B. Mammographic parenchymal pattern: risk indicator for breast cancer? J Am Med Assoc. 247:1982;185-189.
5. Gram I.T., Funkhouser E., Tabar L. The Tabar classification of mammographic parenchymal patterns. Eur J Radiol. 24:1997;131-136.
6. Muller S. L'image numérique en mammographie. J Le Sein. 2(1):1993;3-10.
7. Feig S.A., Yaffe M.J. Digital mammography, computer-aided diagnosis, and telemammography. Radiol Clin North Am. 33(6):1995;1205-1230.
8. Karssemeijer N., Frieling J., Hendricks J. Spatial resolution in digital mammography. Invest Radiol. 28:1993;413-419.
9. Eynius F. Les critères mammographiques de distinction des regroupements microcalciques en foyer (à propos de 400 cas). Thèse en Médecine, Montpellier, France, 1990.
10. Yaffe M.J., Rowlands J.A. X-ray detectors for digital mammography. Phys Med Biol. 42:1997;1-39.
11. Roehrig H., Krupinski E.A., Dallas W.J. Necessary spatial resolution in digital mammography. Lemke H.U. et al. Computer Assisted Radiology. 1996;53-59 Elsevier Science.
12. Bunch P.C. Objective imaging characteristics of mammographic screen-film systems. 2708:1996;241-271.
13. Abdel-Malek A., Kopans D., Moore R., Mitchell R., St. Peters R. Telemammography system development: issues and possible solutions. Second International Workshop on Digital Mammography, York, UK. Excerpta Medica International Congress Series. 1069:1994;Excerpta Medica.
14. Karssemeijer N. Adaptive noise equalization and recognition of microcalcification clusters in mammograms. Int J Pattern Recogn Image Anal. 7(6):1993;1357-1376.
15. Karssemeijer N., Brake G.M. Detection of stellate distortions in mammograms. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 15(5):1996;611-619.
16. Ema T., Doi K., Nishikawa R.M., Jiang Y., Papaioannou J. Image feature analysis and computer-aided diagnosis in mammography: reduction of false-positive clustered microcalcifications using local edge-gradient analysis. Med Phys. 22(2):1995;161-169.
17. Yoshida H., Nishikawa R.M., Giger M.L., Doi K. Computer-aided diagnosis in mammography: detection of clustered microcalcifications based on multiscale edge representation. Lemke H.U. et al. Computer Assisted Radiology. 1996;390-395 Elsevier Science.
18. Qian W., Kallergi M., Clarke L.P., Li H.D., Venugopal P., Song D., Clark R.A. Tree structured wavelet transform segmentation of microcalcifications in digital mammograms. Med Phys. 22(8):1995;1247-1253.
19. Davies D.H., Dance D.R. Automatic computer detection of clustered calcifications in digital mammograms. Phys Med Biol. 35(8):1990;1111-1118.
20. Kahn E., Gavoille A., Masselot J., Bertin F., Genin J. Computer analysis of breast calcifications in mammographic images. Computer Assisted Radiology. 1987;729-733 Elsevier Science.
21. Roehrig J., Doi K., Hasagawa A., Hunt B., Marshall J., Romsdahl H., Scheinder A., Sharbaugh R., Zang W. Clinical results with R2 imagechecker in support of FDA PMA application. Fourth International Workshop on Digital Mammography, Nijmegen, The Netherlands, 1998.
22. Bourrely C., Muller S. Detection of microcalcifications in mammographic images. NATO ASI Series in Computer and System Sciences. 68:1989;325-328 Springer-Verlag.
23. Bothorel S., Bouchon Meunier B., Muller S. A fuzzy logic based approach for semiological analysis of microcalcifications in mammographic images. Int J Intell Syst. 12:1997;2-30.
24. Rifqi M., Bothorel S., Bouchon Meunier B., Muller S. Similarity and prototype based approach for classification of microcalcifications. Int J Gen Syst (in press).
25. Niklason L.T., Christian B.T., Niklason L.E., Kopans D.B., Castleberry D.E., Opsahl-Ong B., Landberg C.E., Slanetz P.J., Giardino A.A., Moore R., Albagli D., DeJule M.C., Fitzgerald P.F., Fobare D.F., Giambattista B.W., Kwasnick R.F., Liu J.Q., Lubowski S.J., Possin G.E., Richotte J.F., Wei C.Y., Wirth R.F. Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging. Radiology. 201:1996;191.
26. Niklason L.T., Christian B.T., Niklason L.E., Kopans D.B., Slanetz P.J., Castleberry D.E., Opsahl-Ong B., Landberg C.E. Digital breast tomosynthesis: potentially a new method for breast cancer screening. Fourth International Workshop on Digital Mammography, Nijmegen, The Netherlands, 1998.
27. Gilles R., Guinebretière J.M., Shapeero L.G., Lesnik A., Contesso G., Sarrazin D., Masselot J., Vanel D. Assessment of breast cancer recurrence with contrast-enhanced subtraction MR imaging: preliminary results in 26 patients. Radiology. 188:1993;473-478.
28. Gilles R., Guinebretière J.M., Toussaint C., Spielman M., Rietjens M., Petit J.Y., Contesso G., Masselot J., Vanel D. Locally advanced breast cancer: contrast-enhanced subtraction MR imaging of response to preoperative chemotherapy. Radiology. 191:1994;633-638.
29. Gilles R., Guinebretière J.M., Lucidarme O., Cluzel P., Janaud G., Finet J.F., Tardivon A., Masselot J., Vanel D. Nonpalpable breast tumors: diagnosis with contrast-enhanced subtraction dynamic MR imaging. Radiology. 191:1994;625-631.
30. Kaiser W.A. False-positive results in dynamic MR mammography. MRI Clin North Am. 2:1994;539-555.
31. Heywang-Köbrunner S.H., Viehweg P., Heinig A., Küchler C. Contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast: accuracy, value, controversies, solutions. Eur J Radiol. 24:1997;94-108.
32. Hagay C., Cherel P.J., de Maulmont C.E., Plantet M.M., Gilles R., Floiras J.L., Garbay J.R., Pallud C.M. Contrast-enhanced CT: value for diagnosing local breast cancer recurrence after conservative treatment. Radiology. 200(3):1996;631-638.
33. Watt A.C., Ackerman L.V., Windham J.P., Shetty P.C., Burke M.W., Flynn M.J., Grodinsky C., Fine G., Wilderman S.J. Breast lesions: differential diagnosis using digital subtraction angiography. Radiology. 159:1986;39-42.