Visualization of intrarenal vessels by 3.0-T MR angiography in comparison with digital subtraction angiography using renal specimens

Pediatric Radiology

Volumn 36, Issue 10, 2006, Pages 1075-1081

  Schenk, Jens Peter ^a   Friebe, Björn ^a   Ley, Sebastian ^a,b   Baudendistel, Klaus ^b   Schoebinger, Max ^b   Hähnel, Stefan ^a   Mehrabi, Arianeb ^a   Tröger, Jochen ^a   Hallscheidt, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^b GERMAN CANCER RESEARCH CENTER DKFZ   (Germany)

Author keywords

Digital subtraction angiography; High field MRI; Kidney; MR angiography

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM PENTETATE; IOPROMIDE;

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; IMAGE QUALITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KIDNEY BLOOD VESSEL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RANK SUM TEST; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SWINE;

ANGIOGRAPHY, DIGITAL SUBTRACTION; ANIMALS; CONTRAST MEDIA; GADOLINIUM DTPA; IOHEXOL; KIDNEY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SWINE;

EID: 33748607158     PISSN: 03010449     EISSN: 14321998     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00247-006-0274-3     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Michaely HJ, Nael K, Schoenberg SO, et al (2005) The feasibility of spatial high-resolution magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) of the renal arteries at 33.0 T. Rofo 177:800-804
2. Hallscheidt PJ, Thorn M, Radeleff BA, et al (2003) Comparison of spatial resolution in high-resolution multislice computed tomography and digital subtraction angiography using renal specimens. J Comput Assist Tomogr 27:864-868
3. Sanaei-Ardekani M, Movahed MR, Movafagh S, et al (2005) Contrast-induced nephropathy: A review. Cardiovasc Revasc Med 6:82-88
4. Leiner T, de Haan MW, Nelemans PJ, et al (2005) Contemporary imaging techniques for the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis. Eur Radiol 15:2219-2229
5. Schenk JP, Schrader C, Zieger B, et al (2006) Reference radiology in nephroblastoma: Accuracy and relevance for preoperative chemotherapy (in German). Rofo 178:38-45
6. Hallscheidt PJ, Bock M, Riedasch G, et al (2004) Diagnostic accuracy of staging renal cell carcinomas using multidetector-row computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging: A prospective study with histopathologic correlation. J Comput Assist Tomogr 28:333-339
7. Hallscheidt P, Schoenberg S, Schenk JP, et al (2002) Multi-Slice CT in the planning of nephron-sparing interventions for renal cell carcinoma: prospective study correlated with histopathology (in German). Rofo 174:898-903
8. Smith PA, Marshall FF, Corl FM, et al (1999) Planning of nephron sparing surgery using 3D helical CT angiography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 23:649-654
9. Linni K, Urban C, Lackner H, et al (2003) Nephron-sparing procedures in 11 patients with Wilms' tumor. Pediatr Surg Int 19:457-462
10. Moorman-Voestermans CGM, Aronson DC, Staalman CR, et al (1998) Is partial nephrectomy appropriate treatment for unilateral Wilms' tumor? J Pediatr Surg 33:165-170
11. Fuchs J, Warmann SW, Szavay P, et al (2005) Three-dimensional visualization and virtual simulation of resections in pediatric solid tumors. J Pediatr Surg 40:364-370
12. Grenier N, Hauger O, Cimpean A, et al (2006) Update of renal imaging. Semin Nucl Med 36:3-15
13. Campeau NG, Huston J 3rd, Bernstein MA, et al (2001) Magnetic resonance angiography at 3.0 Tesla: Initial clinical experience. Top Magn Reson Imaging 12:183-204
14. Kramer U, Kambiz N, Laub G, et al (2006) High-resolution magnetic resonance angiography of the renal arteries using parallel imaging acquisition techniques at 3.0 T: Initial experience. Invest Radiol 41:125-132
15. Omary RA, Henseler KP, Unal O, et al (2002) Validation of injection parameters for catheter-directed intraarterial gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Acad Radiol 9:172-185
16. Endo H, Shimizu T, Kodama Y, et al (2002) Usefulness of 3-dimensional reconstructed images of renal arteries using rotational digital subtraction angiography. J Urol 167:2046-2048