Eigenanalysis of selection ratios from animal radio-tracking data

Ecology

Volumn 87, Issue 9, 2006, Pages 2349-2355

  Calenge, C ^a   Dufour, A B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LYON 1   (France)

Author keywords

Chi square; Design II; Design III; Eigenanalysis; Factorial analysis; Habitat type; Radio tracking; Selection ratios

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; EIGENVALUE; HABITAT AVAILABILITY; HABITAT SELECTION; HABITAT TYPE; HABITAT USE; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; RADIOTELEMETRY; RESOURCE SELECTION; TRACKING;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL DISEASE; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; DECISION MAKING; ECOSYSTEM; GEOGRAPHY; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SCIURIDAE; TELECOMMUNICATION; TELEMETRY;

ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; ECOSYSTEM; GEOGRAPHY; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; RADIO; SCIURIDAE; TELEMETRY;

ANIMALIA; SCIURIDAE;

EID: 33748581635     PISSN: 00129658     EISSN: 00129658     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[2349:EOSRFA]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Aebischer, N. J., P. A. Robertson, and R. E. Kenward. 1993. Compositional analysis of habitat use from animal radio-tracking data. Ecology 74:1313-1325.
2. Austin, M. P. 1985. Continuum concept, ordination methods, and niche theory. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 16:39-61.
3. Austin, M. P. 1999. A silent clash of paradigms: some inconsistencies in community ecology. Oikos 86:170-178.
4. Austin, M. P. 2002. Spatial prediction of species distribution: an interface between ecological theory and statistical modelling. Ecological Modelling 157:101-118.
5. Benhamou, S. 1998. Le domaine vital des mammifères terrestres. Revue d'écologie - La Terre et la Vie 53:309-334.
6. Blondel, J., D. Chessel, and B. Frochot. 1988. Bird species impoverishment, niche expansion and density inflation in Mediterranean island habitats. Ecology 69:1899-1917.
7. Calenge, C. 2006. The package adehabitat for the R software: a tool for the analysis of space and habitat use by animals. Ecological Modelling, in press.
8. Calenge, C., A. B. Dufour, and D. Maillard. 2005. K-select analysis: a new method to analyse habitat selection in radio-tracking studies. Ecological Modelling 186:143-153.
9. Cherry, S. 1996. A comparison of confidence interval methods for habitat use-availability studies. Journal of Wildlife Management 60:653-658.
10. Conner, L. M., and B. W. Plowman. 2001. Using Euclidean distances to assess nonrandom habitat selection. Pages 275-290 in J. Millspaugh and J. Marzluf, editors. Radio tracking and animal populations. Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA.
11. Doledec, S., and D. Chessel. 1994. Co-inertia analysis: an alternative method for studying species-environment relationships. Freshwater Biology 31:277-294.
12. Doledec, S., D. Chessel, and C. Gimaret-Carpentier. 2000. Niche separation in community analysis: a new method. Ecology 81:2914-2927.
13. Dray, S., D. Chessel, and J. Thioulouse. 2003. Co-inertia analysis and the linking of ecological tables. Ecology 84:3078-3089.
14. Erickson, W. P., T. L. McDonald, and R. Skinner. 1998. Habitat selection using GIS data: a case study. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics 3:296-310.
15. Escoufier, Y. 1987. The duality diagram: a means of better practical applications. Pages 139-156 in P. Legendre and L. Legendre, editors. Development in numerical ecology. Springer Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
16. Greenacre, M. J. 1984. Theory and applications of correspondence analysis. Academic Press, London, UK.
17. Hall, L. S., P. R. Krausman, and M. L. Morrison. 1997. The habitat concept and a plea for standard terminology. Wildlife Society Bulletin 25:173-182.
18. Heisey, D. M. 1985. Analyzing selection experiments with log-linear models. Ecology 66:1744-1748.
19. Hill, M. O. 1973. Reciprocal averaging: an eigenvector method of ordination. Journal of Ecology 61:237-249.
20. Hill, M. O. 1974. Correspondence analysis: a neglected multivariate method. Applied Statistics 23:340-354.
21. Hill, M. O. 1991. Patterns of species distribution in Britain elucidated by canonical correspondence analysis. Journal of Biogeography 18:247-255.
22. Johnson, D. H. 1980. The comparison of usage and availability measurements for evaluating resource preference. Ecology 61:65-71.
23. Levin, S. A. 1992. The problem of pattern and scale in Ecology. Ecology 73:1943-1967.
24. Manly, B. F. J., L. L. McDonald, D. L. Thomas, T. L. MacDonald, and W. P. Erickson. 2002. Resource selection by animals. Statistical design and analysis for field studies. Second edition. Kluwer Academic Publisher, London, UK.
25. Manly, B. F. J., P. Miller, and L. Cook. 1972. Analysis of a selective predation experiment. American Naturalist 106:719-736.
26. Mohr, C. O. 1947. Table of equivalent populations of North American small mammals. American Midland Naturalist 37:223-249.
27. Mysterud, A., and R. A. Ims. 1998. Functional responses in habitat use: availability influences relative use in trade-off situations. Ecology 79:1435-1441.
28. Neu, C. W., C. R. Byers, and J. M. Peek. 1974. A technique for analysis of utilization-availability data. Journal of Wildlife Management 38:541-545.
29. Ølkand, R. H. 1996. Are ordination and constrained ordination alternative or complementary strategies in general ecological studies? Journal of Vegetation Science 7:289-292.
30. Otis, D. L. 1998. Analysis of the influence of spatial pattern in habitat selection studies. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics 3:254-267.
31. Otis, D. L., and G. C. White. 1999. Autocorrelation of location estimates and the analysis of radiotracking data. Journal of Wildlife Management 63:1039-1044.
32. R Development Core Team. 2005. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. 〈http://www.R-project.org〉.
33. Schooley, R. L. 1994. Annual variation in habitat selection: patterns concealed by pooled data. Journal of Wildlife Management 58:367-374.
34. ter Braak, C. J. F. 1985. Correspondence analysis of incidence and abundance data : properties in terms of a unimodal response model. Biometrics 41:859-873.
35. ter Braak, C. J. F. 1986. Canonical correspondence analysis: a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology 67:1167-1179.
36. ter Braak, C. J. F., and I. C. Prentice. 1988. A theory of gradient analysis. Advances in Ecological Research 18:271-317.
37. Thioulouse, J., and D. Chessel. 1992. A method for reciprocal scaling of species tolerance and sample diversity. Ecology 73:670-680.
38. Thioulouse, J., M. Simier, and D. Chessel. 2004. Simultaneous analysis of a sequence of paired ecological tables. Ecology 85:272-283.
39. Thomas, D. L., and E. J. Taylor. 1990. Study designs and tests for comparing resource use and availability. Journal of Wildlife Management 54:322-330.
40. White, G. C., and R. A. Garrott. 1990. Analysis of wildlife radio-tracking data. Academic Press, London, UK.