Are ordination and constrained ordination alternative or complementary strategies in general ecological studies?

Journal of Vegetation Science

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 289-292

  Økland, Rune Halvorsen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000801533     PISSN: 11009233     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/3236330     Document Type: Review

References (38)

1. Andersson, F. 1970. Ecological studies in a Scanian woodland and meadow area. Southern Sweden. I. Vegetational and environmental structure. Opera Bot. 27: 1-190.
2. Beibin, L. 1991. Semi-strong hybrid scaling, a new ordination algorithm. J. Veg. Sci. 2: 491-496.
3. Birks, H.J.B., Peglar, S.M. & Austin, H.A. 1994. An annotated bibliography of canonical correspondence analysis and related constrained ordination methods 1986-1993. Report Botanical Institute, University of Bergen, Bergen.
4. Borcard, D., Legendre, P. & Drapeau, P. 1992. Partialling out the spatial component of ecological variation. Ecology 73: 1045-1055.
5. Cramer, W. & Hytteborn, H. 1987. The separation of fluctuation and long-term change in vegetation dynamics of a rising seashore. Vegetatio 69: 157-167.
6. del Moral, R., Titus, J.H. & Cook, A.M. 1995. Early primary succession on Mount St. Helens, Washington, USA. J. Veg. Sci. 6: 107-120.
7. Ericson, L. 1977. The influence of voles and lemmings on the vegetation in a coniferous forest during a 4-year period in northern Sweden. Wahlenbergia 4: 1-114.
8. Gauch, H.G. 1982. Noise reduction by eigenvector ordinations. Ecology 63: 1643-1649.
9. Hill, M.O. 1979. DECORANA - A Fortran program for detrended correspondence analysis and reciprocal averaging. Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY.
10. Hill, M.O. & Gauch, H.G. 1980. Detrended correspondence analysis: an improved ordination technique. Vegetatio 42: 47-58.
11. Hörnberg, G., Ohlson, M. & Zackrisson, O. 1995. Stand dynamics, regeneration patterns and long-term continuity in boreal old-growth Picea abies swamp-forests. J. Veg. Sci. 6: 291-298.
12. Jackson, D.A. & Somers, K.M. 1991. Putting things in order: the ups and downs of detrended correspondence analysis. Am. Nat. 137: 704-712.
13. Jonsson, B.C. & Esseen, P.-A. 1990. Treefall disturbance maintains high bryophyte diversity in a boreal spruce forest. J. Ecol. 78: 924-936.
14. Kantvilas, G. & Minchin, P.R. 1989. An analysis of epiphytic lichen communities in Tasmanian cool temperate rainforest. Vegetatio 84: 99-112.
15. Kenkel, N.C. & Orlóci, L. 1986. Applying metric and nonmetric multidimensional scaling to ecological studies: some new results. Ecology 67: 919-928.
16. Kent, M. & Ballard, J. 1988. Trends and problems in the application of classification and ordination methods in plant ecology. Vegetatio 78: 109-124.
17. Lepš, J., Michálek, J., Kulisek, P. & Uhlík, P. 1995. Use of paired plots and multivariate analysis for the determination of goat grazing preference. J. Veg. Sci. 6: 37-42.
18. Machena, C. 1987. Zonation of submerged macrophyte vegetation in Lake Kariba, Zimbabwe and its ecological interpretation. Vegetatio 73: 111-119.
19. Minchin, P.R. 1987. An evaluation of the relative robustness of techniques for ecological ordination. Vegetatio 69: 89-107.
20. Odland, A., Birks. H.H., Botnen, A.,Tønsberg, T. & Vevle, O. 1991. Vegetation change in the spray zone of a waterfall following river regulation in Aurland, Western Norway. Regul. Rivers Res. Manage. 6: 147-162.
21. Odland, A., Birks, H.J.B. & Line, J.M. 1990. Quantitative vegetation-environment relationships in west Norwegian tall-fern vegetation. Nord. J. Bot. 10: 511-533.
22. Økland, R.H. 1990a. Vegetation ecology: theory, methods and applications with reference to Fennoscandia. Sommerfeltia Suppl. 1: 1-233.
23. Økland, R.H. 1990b. A phytoecological study of the mire Northern Kisselbergmosen, SE Norway. II. Identification of gradients by detrended (canonical) correspondence analysis. Nord. J. Bot. 10: 79-108.
24. Økland, R.H. 1995. Persistence of vascular plants in a Norwegian boreal coniferous forest. Ecography 18: 3-14.
25. Økland, R.H. & Eilertsen, O. 1993. Vegetation-environment relationships of boreal coniferous forests in the Solhomfjell area, Gjerstad, S Norway. Sommerfeltia 16: 1-254.
26. Økland, R.H. & Eilertsen, O. 1994. Canonical correspondence analysis with variation partitioning: some comments and an application. J. Veg. Sci. 5: 117-126.
27. Oksanen, J. 1988. A note on the occasional instability of detrending in correspondence analysis. Vegetatio 74: 29-32.
28. Palmer, M.W. 1993. Putting things in even better order: the advantages of canonical correspondence analysis. Ecology 14: 2215-2230.
29. Prentice, I.C. 1977. Non-metric ordination methods in ecology. J. Ecol. 65: 85-94.
30. Robertson, G.P., Huston, M.A., Evans, F.C. & Tiedje, J.M. 1988. Spatial variability in a successional plant community: patterns of nitrogen availability. Ecology 69: 1517-1524.
31. Smilauer, P. 1992. CANODRAW: user's guide, v. 3.0. - Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, NY.
32. ter Braak, C.J.F. 1986. Canonical correspondence analysis: a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology 67: 1167-1179.
33. ter Braak, C.J.F. 1987a. The analysis of vegetation-environment relationships by canonical correspondence analysis. Vegetatio 69: 69-77.
34. ter Braak, C.J.F. 1987b. CANOCO - a FORTRAN program for canonical community ordination by (partial) (detrended) (canonical) correspondence analysis, principal components analysis and redundancy analysis (version 2.1). TNO Inst. appl. Comp. Sci., Stat. Dept. Wageningen, Wageningen.
35. ter Braak, C.J.F. 1990. Update notes: CANOCO version 3.10. Agricultural Mathematics Group, Wageningen.
36. ter Braak, C.J.F. & Prentice, I.C. 1988. A theory of gradient analysis. Adv. Ecol. Res. 18: 271-317.
37. ter Braak, C.J.F. & Wiertz, J. 1994. On the statistical analysis of vegetation change: a wetland affected by water extraction and soil acidification. J. Veg. Sci. 5: 361-372.
38. Whittaker, R.H. 1956. Vegetation of the Great Smoky Mountains. Ecol. Monogr. 26: 1-80.