Fitness and genetic architecture of parent and hybrid willows in common gardens

Evolution

Volumn 60, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 1215-1227

  Fritz, Robert S ^a   Hochwender, Cris G ^a,b   Albrectsen, Benedicte R ^a,c   Czesak, Mary Ellen ^a  

^a VASSAR COLLEGE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EVANSVILLE   (United States)

^c UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Epistasis; Fitness; Genetic architecture; Hybrid; Hybrid zone; Willow

Indexed keywords

ABOVEGROUND BIOMASS; DECIDUOUS TREE; FITNESS; GENETIC STRUCTURE; GERMINATION; HOME GARDEN; SEED PRODUCTION; SOIL MOISTURE;

SALIX; SALIX ERIOCEPHALA;

WATER;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; ECOSYSTEM; GENETICS; GERMINATION; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HYBRIDIZATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT SEED; SOIL; WILLOW;

ECOSYSTEM; GERMINATION; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; SALIX; SEEDS; SOIL; WATER;

EID: 33748551378     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1554/05-343.1     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Allison, P. D. 1995. Survival analysis using the SAS system: a practical guide. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC.
2. Argus, G. W. 1974. An experimental study of hybridization and pollination in Salix (willows). Can. J. Bot. 52:1613-1619.
3. _. 1986. The genus Salix (Salicaceae) in the southeastern United States. Syst. Bot. Monogr. 9:1-170.
4. Armbruster, P., W. E. Bradshaw, and C. M. Holzapfel. 1997. Evolution of the genetic architecture underlying fitness in the pitcher-plant mosquito, Wyeomyia smithii. Evolution 51:451-458.
5. Arnold, M. L. 1992. Natural hybridization as an evolutionary process. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 23:237-261.
6. _. 1997. Natural hybridization and evolution. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
7. Arnold, M. L., and S. A. Hodges. 1995. Are natural hybrids fit or unfit relative to their parents? Trends Ecol. Evol. 10:67-71.
8. Arnold, M. L., M. R. Bulger, J. M. Burke, A. L. Hempel, and J. H. Williams. 1999. Natural hybridization: How low can you go (and still be important)? Ecology 80:371-381.
9. Barton, N. H., and G. M. Hewitt. 1985. Analysis of hybrid zones. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 16:113-148.
10. Bieri, J., and T. J. Kawecki. 2003. Genetic architecture of differences between populations of cowpea weevil (Callosobruchus maculatus) evolved in the same environment. Evolution 57:274-287.
11. Bradshaw, W. E., and C. M. Holzapfel. 2000. The evolution of genetic architectures and the divergence of natural populations. Pp. 245-263 in J. B. Wolf, E. D. Brodie III, and M. J. Wade, eds. Epistasis and the evolutionary process. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
12. 1 performance. Evolution 52:37-43.
13. Campbell, D. R. 2004. Natural selection in Ipomopsis hybrid zones: implications for ecological speciation. New Phytol. 161:83-90.
14. Cruzan, M. B., and M. L. Arnold. 1993. Ecological and genetic associations in an iris hybrid zone. Evolution 47:1432-1445.
15. Czesak, M. E., M. J. Knee, R. G. Gale, S. D. Bodach, and R. S. Fritz. 2004. Genetic architecture of resistance to aphids and mites in a willow hybrid system. Heredity 96:619-626.
16. Emms, S. K., and M. L. Arnold. 1997. The effect of habitat on parental and hybrid fitness: transplant experiments with Louisiana irises. Evolution 51:1112-1119.
17. Fenster, C. B., and L. F. Galloway. 2000. Population differentiation in an annual legume: genetic architecture. Evolution 54:1157-1172.
18. Freeman, D. C., W. A. Turner, E. D. McArthur, and J. H. Graham. 1991. Characterization of a narrow hybrid zone between two species of big sagebrush (Artemesia tridentata: Asteraceae). Am. J. Bot. 78:805-815.
19. Freund, R. J., and R. C. Littell. 1985. SAS for linear models: a guide to the ANOVA and GLM procedures. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC.
20. Fritz, R. S., C. M. Nichold-Orians, and S. J. Brunsfeld. 1994. Interspecific hybridization of plants and resistance to herbivores: hypotheses, genetics, and variable responses in a diverse herbivore community. Oecologia 97:106-117.
21. Fritz, R. S., B. M. Roche, S. J. Brunsfeld, and C. M. Orians. 1996. Interspecific and temporal variation in herbivore responses to hybrid willows. Oecologia 108:121-129.
22. Fritz, R. S., C. G. Hochwender, S. J. Brunsfeld, and B. M. Roche. 2003. Genetic architecture of susceptibility to herbivores in hybrid willows. J. Evol. Biol. 16:1115-1126.
23. Fry, J. D. 1999. The role of adaptation to host plants in the evolution of reproductive isolation: negative evidence from Tetranychus urticae Koch. Exp. Appl Acarol. 23:379-387.
24. Gilchrist, A. S., and L. Partridge. 1999. A comparison of the genetic basis of wing size divergence in three parallel body size clines of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 153:1775-1787.
25. Grant, B. R., and P. R. Grant. 1996. High survival of Darwin's finch hybrids: effects of beak morphology and diets. Ecology 77:500-509.
26. Grant, P. R., and B. R. Grant. 1992. Hybridization of bird species. Science 256:193-197.
27. _. 1994. Phenotypic and genetic effsts of hybridization in Darwin's finches. Evolution 48:297-316.
28. Grant, V. 1981. Plant speciation. 2nd ed. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
29. Hardig, T. M., S. J. Brunsfeld, R. S. Fritz, M. Morgan, and C. M. Orians. 2000. Morphological and molecular evidence for hybridization and introgression in a willow (Salix) hybrid zone. Mol. Ecol. 9:9-24.
30. Harrison, R. G. 1986. Pattern and process in a narrow hybrid zone. Heredity 56:337-349.
31. _. 1990. Hybrid zones: windows on the evolutionary process. Oxf. Surv. Evol. Biol. 7:69-128.
32. Howard, D. J. 1986. A zone of overlap and hybridization between two ground cricket species. Evolution 40:34-43.
33. Insightful Corp. 2001. S-Plus for Windows user's guide. Insightful Corp., Seattle, WA.
34. Laing, W., D. Greer, O. Sun, P. Beets, A. Lowe, and T. Payn. 2000. Physiological impacts of Mg deficiency in Pinus radiata: growth and photosynthesis. New Phytol. 146:47-57.
35. Lynch, M. 1991. The genetic interpretation of inbreeding depression and outbreeding depression. Evolution 45:622-629.
36. Lynch, M., and B. Walsh. 1998. Genetics and the analysis of quantitative traits. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
37. Marshall, J. L., M. L. Arnold, and D. J. Howard. 2002. Reinforcement: the road not taken. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17:558-563.
38. Mather, K., and J. L. Jinks. 1982. Biometrical genetics: the study of continuous variation. Chapman and Hall, London.
39. Milne, R. I., S. Terzioglu, and R. J. Abbott. 2003. A hybrid zone dominated by fertile F1s: maintenance of species barriers in Rhododendron. Mol. Ecol. 12:2719-2729.
40. Moore, W. S. 1977. An evaluation of narrow hybrid zones in vertebrates. Q. Rev. Biol. 52:263-277.
41. Mosseler, A. 1990. Hybrid performance and species crossability relationships in willows (Salix). Can. J. Bot. 68:2329-2338.
42. Mosseler, A., and C. S. Papadopol. 1989. Seasonal isolation a reproductive barrier among sympatric Salix species. Can. J. Bot. 67:2563-2570.
43. Nagy, E. S. 1997. Frequency-dependent seed production and hybridization rates: implications for gene flow between locally adapted plant populations. Evolution 51:703-714.
44. Nechwatal, J., and W. F. Osswald. 2003. Evidence for the involvement of biotic factors in the yellowing disease of Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.) at higher elevations of the Bavarian Forest. Plant Soil 254:403-414.
45. Rieseberg, L. H. 1995. The role of hybridization in evolution: old wine in new skins. Am. J. Bot. 82:944-953.
46. Rieseberg, L. H., and S. E. Carney. 1998. Plant hybridization. New. Phytol. 140:599-624.
47. Rieseberg, L. H., B. Sinervo, C. R. Linder, M. C. Ungerer, and D. M. Arias. 1996. Role of gene interactions in hybrid speciation: evidence from ancient and experimental hybrids. Science 272:741-745.
48. Schierup, M. H., and F. B. Christiansen. 1996. Inbreeding depression and outbreeding depression in plants. Heredity 77:461-468.
49. Seehausen, O. 2004. Hybridization and adaptive radiation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19:198-207.
50. Sokal, R. R., and F. J. Rolhf. 1995. Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research. W. H. Freeman and Co., New York.
51. Soltis, D. E., P. S. Soltis, and J. A. Tate. 2004. Advances in the studies of polyploidy since Plant Speciation. New Phytol. 161:173-191.
52. Stebbins, G. L. 1959. The role of hybridization in evolution. Proc. Am. Philos. Soc. 103:231-251.
53. Sun, O. J., G. J. H. P. Gielen, R. Sands, C. T. Smith, and A. J. Thorn. 2001. Growth, Mg nutrition and photosynthetic activity in Pinus radiata: evidence that NaCl addition counteracts the impact of low Mg supply. Trees Struct. Funct. 15:335-340.
54. Templeton, A. R. 1986. Coadaptation and outbreeding depression. Pp. 105-116 in M. E. Soulé, ed. Conservation biology: the science of scarcity and diversity. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
55. Wang, H., E. D. McArthur, S. C. Sanderson, J. H. Graham, and D. C. Freeman. 1997. Narrow hybrid zone between two subspecies of big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentate: Asteraceae). 4. Reciprocal transplant experiments. Evolution 51:95-102.
56. Waser, N. M. 1993. Population structure, optimal outbreeding, and assortative mating in angiosperms. Pp. 173-199 in N. W. Thornhill, ed. Natural history of inbreeding and outbreeding. Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago.
57. Weber-Blaschke, G., M. Claus, and K. E. Rehfuess. 2002. Growth and nutrition of ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.) and sycamore (Acer pseudoplatanus L.) on soils of different base saturation in pot experiments. For. Ecol. Manag. 167:43-56.
58. Wolf, J. B., E. D. Brodie III,and M. J. Wade. 2000. Epistasis and the evolutionary process. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.