Hybrid fitness in the Louisiana irises: Analysis of parental and F1 performance

Evolution

Volumn 52, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 37-43

  Burke, John M ^a   Carney, Shanna E ^a,b   Arnold, Michael L ^a  

^a University of Georgia   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Hybrid fitness; Louisiana irises; Mosaic hybrid zones; Natural hybridization; Natural selection; Tension zones

Indexed keywords

GERMINATION; GREENHOUSE; HYBRID; IRIS; PLANT GROWTH; SEXUAL REPRODUCTION; UNITED STATES;

FITNESS; HYBRID ZONE EVOLUTION; MOSAIC MODEL; TENSION ZONE;

IRIS FULVA; IRIS HEXAGONA;

EID: 0031898076     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1998.tb05136.x     Document Type: Review

References (46)

1. ANDERSON, E. 1949. Introgressive hybridization. Wiley, New York.
2. ANDERSON, E., AND G. L. STEBBINS JR. 1954. Hybridization as an evolutionary stimulus. Evolution 8:378-388.
3. ARNOLD, M. L. 1992. Natural hybridization as an evolutionary process. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 23:237-261.
4. _. 1993. Iris nelsonii: origin and genetic composition of a homoploid hybrid species. Am. J. Bot. 80:577-583.
5. _. 1997. Natural hybridization and evolution. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
6. ARNOLD, M. L., AND B. D. BENNETT. 1993. Natural hybridization in Louisiana irises: genetic variation and ecological determinants. Pp. 115-139 In R. G. Harrison, ed. Hybrid zones and the evolutionary process. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
7. ARNOLD, M. L., AND S. A. HODGES. 1995, Are natural hybrids fit or unfit relative to their parents? Trends Ecol. Evol. 10:67-71.
8. ARNOLD, M. L., B. D. BENNETT, AND E. A. ZIMMER. 1990a. Natural hybridization between Iris fulva and I. hexagona: pattern of ribosomal DNA variation. Evolution 44:1512-1521.
9. ARNOLD, M. L., J. L. HAMRICK., AND B. D. BENNETT. 1990b. Allozyme variation in Louisiana irises: a test for introgression and hybrid speciation. Heredity 65:297-306.
10. ARNOLD, M. L., C. M. BUCKNER, AND J. J. ROBINSON. 1991. Pollen mediated introgression and hybrid speciation in Louisiana irises. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 88:1398-1402.
11. ARNOLD, M. L., J. J. ROBINSON, C. M. BUCKNER, AND B. D. BENNETT. 1992. Pollen dispersal and interspecific gene flow in Louisiana irises. Heredity 68:399-404.
12. ARNOLD, M. L., J. L. HAMRICK, AND B. D. BENNETT. 1993. Interspecific pollen competition and reproductive isolation in Iris. J. Hered. 84:13-16.
13. BARTON, N. H., AND G. M. HEWITT. 1985. Analysis of hybrid zones. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 16:113-148.
14. BENNETT, B. D. 1989. Habitat differentiation of Iris fulva Ker-Gawler, Iris hexagona Walter, and their hybrids. Ph.D. diss. Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA.
15. CARNEY, S. E., S. A. HODGES, AND M. L. ARNOLD. 1996. Effect: of pollen-tube growth and ovule position on hybridization in the Louisiana irises. Evolution 50:1871-1878.
16. COLE, L. C. 1954. The population consequences of life history phenomena. Q. Rev. Biol. 29:103-137.
17. CRUZAN, M. B., AND M. L. ARNOLD. 1993. Ecological and genetic associations in an Iris hybrid zone. Evolution 47:1432-1445.
18. _. 1994. Assortative mating and natural selection in an Iris hybrid zone. Evolution 48:1946-1958.
19. DOWLING, T. E., AND B. D. DEMARAIS. 1993. Evolutionary significance of introgressive hybridization in cyprinid fishes. Nature 362:444-446.
20. ELLSTRAND, N. C., R. WHITKUS, AND L. H. RIESEBERG. 1996. Dis tribution of spontaneous plant hybrids. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 93:5090-5093.
21. EMMS, S. K., AND M. L. ARNOLD. 1997. The effect of habitat on parental and hybrid fitness: reciprocal transplant experiments with Louisiana irises. Evolution 51:1112-1119.
22. GRAHAM, J. H., D. C. FREEMAN, AND E. D. MCARTHUR. 1995. Narrow hybrid zone between two subspecies of big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata: Asteraceae). II. Selection gradients and hybrid fitness. Am. J. Bot. 82:709-716.
23. GRANT, B. R., AND P. R. GRANT. 1993. Evolution of Darwin's finches caused by a rare climatic event. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 251:111-117.
24. _. 1996. High survival of Darwin's finch hybrids: effects of beak morphology and diets. Ecology 77:500-509.
25. GRANT, P. R., AND B. R. GRANT. 1994. Phenotypic and genetic effects of hybridization in Darwin's finches. Evolution 48:297-316.
26. HARRISON, R. G. 1986. Pattern and process in a narrow hybrid zone. Heredity 56:337-349.
27. HODGES, S. A., J. M. BURKE, AND M. L. ARNOLD. 1996. Natural formation of Iris hybrids: experimental evidence on the establishment of hybrid zones. Evolution 50:2504-2509.
28. HOWARD, D. J. 1986. A zone of overlap and hybridization between two ground cricket species. Evolution 40:34-43.
29. KEY, K. H. L. 1968. The concept of stasipatric speciation. Syst. Zool. 17:14-22.
30. LEWONTIN, R. C., AND L. C. BIRCH. 1966. Hybridization as a source of variation for adaptation to new environments. Evolution 20: 315-336.
31. MAYR, E. 1963. Animal species and evolution. Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA.
32. _. 1992. A local flora and the biological species concept. Am. J. Bot. 79:222-238.
33. NASON, J. D., N. C. ELLSTRAND, AND M. L. ARNOLD. 1992. Patterns of hybridization and introgression in populations of oaks, manzanitas and irises. Am. J. Bot. 79:101-111.
34. PRICE, V. M., AND N. M. WASER. 1982. Experimental studies of pollen carryover: hummingbirds and Ipornopsis aggregate. Oecologia 54:353-358.
35. RANDOLPH, L. F., I. S. NELSON, AND R. L. PLAISTED. 1967. Negative evidence of introgression affecting the stability of Louisiana Iris species. Cornell Univ. Agric. Exp. Sta. Mem. 398:1-56.
36. RIESEBERG, L. H., AND J. F. WENDEL. 1993. Introgression and its consequences in plants. Pp. 70-109 in R. G. Harrison, ed. Hybrid zones and the evolutionary process. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
37. ROCHA, O. J., AND A. G. STKPHENSON. 1990. Effect of ovule position on seed production, seed weight, and progeny performance in Phaseolus coccineus L. (Leguminosae). Am. J. Bot. 77:1320-1329.
38. SAS INSTITUTE. 1990. SAS/STAT user's guide. Vers. 6, 4th ed. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC.
39. SCHAAL, B. A. 1980. Measurement of gene flow in Lupinus texensis. Nature 284:450-451.
40. STEBBINS, G. L., JR. 1959. The role of hybridization in evolution. Proc. Am. Philo. Soc. 103:231-251.
41. STEPHENSON, A. G., J. A. WINSOR, AND C. D. SCHLICHTING. 1988. Evidence for non-random fertilization in the common zucchini, Cucurbita pepo. Pp. 333-338 in M. Cresti, P. Gori, and E. Pacini, eds. Reproduction in higher plants. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
42. THOMSON, J. D., AND R. C. PLOWRIGHT. 1980. Pollen carryover, nectar rewards, and pollinator behavior with special reference to Diervilla lonicera. Oecologia 46:68-74.
43. VIOSCA, P., JR. 1935. The irises of southeastern Louisiana: a taxonomic and ecological interpretation. Bull. Am. Iris Soc. 57:3-56.
44. WAGNER, W. H., JR. 1970. Biosystematics and evolutionary noise. Taxon 19:146-151.
45. WANG, H., E. D. MCARTHUR, S. C. SANDERSON, J. H. GRAHAM, AND D. C. FREEMAN. 1997. Narrow hybrid zone between two subspecies of big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata: Asteraceae). IV. Reciprocal transplant experiments. Evolution 51:95-102.
46. WASER, N. M., AND M. V. PRICE. 1984. Experimental studies of pollen carryover: effects of floral variability in Ipomopsis ag-gregata. Oecologia 62:262-268.