Context effects of pictures and words in naming objects, reading words, and generating simple phrases

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 59, Issue 10, 2006, Pages 1764-1784

  Roelofs, Ardi ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOLINGUISTICS   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; MEMORY; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; READING; SEMANTICS; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISION;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; MEMORY; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; REACTION TIME; READING; SEMANTICS; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 33748504536     PISSN: 17470218     EISSN: 17470226     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17470210500416052     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Altmann, E. M., & Davidson, D. J. (2001). An integrative approach to Stroop: Combining a language model and a unified cognitive theory. Proceedings of the 23rd Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 21-26). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
2. Bloem, I., & La Heij, W. (2003). Semantic facilitation and semantic interference inword translation: Implications for models of lexical access in language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 468-488.
3. Bloem, I., Van den Boogaard, S., & La Heij, W. (2004). Semantic facilitation and semantic interference in language production: Further evidence for the conceptual selection model of lexical access. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 307-323.
4. Caramazza, A. (1997). How many levels of processing are there in lexical access? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14, 177-208.
5. Caramazza, A., & Costa, A. (2000). The semantic interference effect in the picture-word interference paradigm: Does the response set matter? Cognition, 75, B51-B64.
6. Caramazza, A., & Costa, A. (2001). Set size and repetition in the picture-word interference paradigm: Implications for models of naming. Cognition, 80, 291-298.
7. Caramazza, A., Miozzo, M., Costa, A., Schiller, N. O., & Alario, F.-X. (2001). A cross-linguistic investigation of determiner production. In E. Dupoux (Ed.), Language, brain, and cognitive development: Essays in honor of Jacques Mehler (pp. 209-226). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. Cattell, J. M. (1886). The time it takes to see and name objects. Mind, 11, 63-65.
9. Corbett, G. (1991). Gender. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
10. Damian, M. F., & Bowers, J. S. (2003). Locus of semantic interference in picture-word interference tasks. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 111-117.
11. Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93, 283-321.
12. Glaser, W. R., & Düngelhoff, F.-J. (1984). The time course of picture-word interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 640-654.
13. Glaser, W. R., & Glaser, M. O. (1989). Context effects in Stroop-like word and picture processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 13-42.
14. La Heij, W., Mak, P., Sander, J., & Willboordse, E. (1998). The gender congruency effect in picture-word tasks. Psychological Research, 61, 209-219.
15. Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1-38.
16. Lupker, S. J. (1984). Semantic priming without association: A second look. Journal of Verbal Learning and Behavior, 23, 709-733.
17. MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163-203.
18. Monsell, S. (1996). Control of mental processes. In V. Bruce (Ed.), Unresolved mysteries of the mind: Tutorial essays in cognition (pp. 93-148). Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
19. Morsella, E., & Miozzo, M. (2002). Evidence for a cascade model of lexical access in speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 555-563.
20. Navarrete, E., & Costa, A. (2005). Phonological activation of ignored pictures: Further evidence for a cascade model of lexical access. Journal of Memory and Language, 53, 359-377.
21. Neely, J. H. (1991). Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. In D. Besner & G.W. Humphreys (Eds.), Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition (pp. 264-336). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
22. Peterson, R. R., & Savoy, P. (1998). Lexical selection and phonological encoding during language production: Evidence for cascaded processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 539-557.
23. Roelofs, A. (1992). A spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking. Cognition, 42, 107-142.
24. Roelofs, A. (1997). The WEAVER model of wordform encoding in speech production. Cognition, 64, 249-284.
25. Roelofs, A. (2001). Set size and repetition matter: Comment on Caramazza and Costa (2000). Cognition, 80, 283-290.
26. Roelofs, A. (2003). Goal-referenced selection of verbal action: Modeling attentional control in the Stroop task. Psychological Review, 110, 88-125.
27. Roelofs, A. (2006). The functional architecture of naming dice, digits, and number words. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21, 78-111.
28. Roelofs, A., & Hagoort, P. (2002). Control of language use: Cognitive modeling of the hemodynamics of Stroop task performance. Cognitive Brain Research, 15, 85-97.
29. Schiller, N. O., & Caramazza, A. (2003). Grammatical feature selection in noun phrase production: Evidence from German and Dutch. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 169-194.
30. Schriefers, H. (1993). Syntactic processes in the production of noun phrases. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 841-850.
31. Schwichtenberg, B., & Schiller, N. O. (2004). Semantic gender assignment regularities in German. Brain and Language, 90, 326-337.
32. Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643-662.