Interphase M-FISH applications using commercial probes in prenatal and PGD diagnostics

Cytogenetic and Genome Research

Volumn 114, Issue 3-4, 2006, Pages 296-301

  Stumm, M ^a,b   Wegner, R D ^a   Bloechle, M ^c   Eckel, H ^c  

^a Centre of Prenatal Diagnosis   (Germany)

^b OTTO VON GUERICKE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^c Fertility Centre at Kaiser Wilhelm Memorial Church   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMNIOCENTESIS; AMNION CELL; ANEUPLOIDY; ARTICLE; CHORION VILLUS; CHROMOSOME ABERRATION; CHROMOSOME ANALYSIS; CYTOGENETICS; FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; GENE PROBE; HUMAN; INTERPHASE; MATERNAL AGE; NUCHAL TRANSLUCENCY MEASUREMENT; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; TRISOMY;

AMNIOCENTESIS; AMNION; ANEUPLOIDY; FEMALE; HUMANS; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION, FLUORESCENCE; KARYOTYPING; MOSAICISM; PREGNANCY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TRISOMY;

EID: 33748474983     PISSN: 14248581     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000094217     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bink K, Pauer HU, Bartels I: Interphase-FISH-Test als Schnelltest für Trisomien im Fruchtwasser - Ergebnisse einer prospektiven Untersuchung. Z Geburtsh Neonatol 204:8-13 (2000).
2. Bryndorf T, Christensen B, Vad M, Parner J, Brocks V, Philip J: Prenatal detection of chromosome aneuploidies by fluorescence in situ hybridization: experience with 2000 uncultured amniotic fluid samples in a prospective preclinical trial. Prenat Diagn 17:333-341 (1997).
3. Cheong Leung W, Chitayat D, Seaward G, Windrim R, Ryan G, Barrett J, Winsor EJ: Role of amniotic fluid interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis in patient management. Prenat Diagn 21:327-332 (2001).
4. Eckel H, Stumm M, Wieacker P, Kleinstein J: Multilocus-FISH (ML-FISH) is a reliable tool for nondisjunction studies in human oocytes. Cytogenet Genome Res 103:47-53 (2004).
5. Eiben B, Trawicki W, Hammans W, Goebel R, Pruggmayer M, Epplen JT: Rapid prenatal diagnosis of aneuploidies in uncultured amniocytes by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Evaluation of >3,000 cases. Fetal Diagn Ther 14:193-197 (1999a).
6. Eiben B, Trawicki W, Hammans W, Epplen JT: False-negative finding in rapid interphase FISH analysis of uncultured amniotic cells. Prenat Diagn 19:892-893 (1999b).
7. George AM, Oei P, Winship I: False-positive diagnosis of trisomy 21 using fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) on uncultured amniotic fluid cells. Prenat Diagn 23:302-305 (2003).
8. Grossmann B, Schwaab E, Khanaga O, Hahn T, Schorsch M, Haaf T: Aneuploidiediagnostik an Polkörpern nach ICSI bei 460 Frauen mit multiplen Fehlgeburten, Implantationsversagen oder erhöhtem mütterlichen Alter. Med Genet 16:408-412 (2004).
9. Gutierrez-Mateo C, Benet J, Wells D, Colls P, Bermudez MG, Sanchez-Garcia JF, Egozcue J, Navarro J, Munne S: Aneuploidy study of human oocytes first polar body comparative genomic hybridization and metaphase II fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis. Hum Reprod 19:2859-2568 (2004).
10. Held KR: QS Zytogenetik Bericht 2002/2003. Med Genet 15:420-421 (2003).
11. Liehr T, Beensen V, Hauschild R, Ziegler M, Hartmann I, Starke H, Heller A, Kahler C, Schmidt M, Reiber W, Hesse M, Claussen U: Pitfalls of rapid prenatal diagnosis using the interphase nucleus. Prenat Diagn 21:419-421 (2001).
12. Liehr T, Schreyer I, Neumann A, Beensen V, Ziegler M, Hartmann I, Starke H, Heller A, Nietzel A, Claussen U: Two more possible pitfalls of rapid prenatal diagnostics using interphase nuclei. Prenat Diagn 22:497-499 (2002).
13. Montag M, van der Ven K, van der Ven H: Erste klinische Erfahrung mit der Polkörperdiagnostik in Deutschland. J Fertil Reprod 4:23-27 (2002).
14. Montag M, Limbach N, Sabarstinski M, van der Ven K, Dorn C, van der Ven H: Polar body biopsy and aneuploidy testing by simultaneous detection of six chromosomes. Prenat Diagn 25:867-871 (2005).
15. Pergament E, Chen PX, Thangavelu M, Fiddler M: The clinical application of interphase FISH in prenatal diagnosis. Prenat Diagn 20:215-220 (2000).
16. Röpke A, Stumm M, Wieacker P: Fluoreszenz-insitu-Hybridisierung (FISH) an nichtkultivierten Amnionzellen zur Diagnostik häufiger Chromosomenstörungen. Reproduktionsmedizin 18:289-294 (2002).
17. Sawa R, Hayashi Z, Tanaka T, Onda T, Hoshi K, Fukada Y, Takai Y, Taketani Y, et al: Rapid detection of chromosome aneuploidies by prenatal interphase FISH (fluorescence in situ hybridization) and its clinical utility in Japan. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 27:41-47 (2001).
18. Skinner JL, Govberg IJ, DePalma RT, Cotter PD: Heteromorphisms of chromosome 18 can obscure detection of fetal aneuploidy by interphase FISH. Prenat Diagn 21:702-704 (2001).
19. Strom CM, Levin R, Strom S, Masciangelo C, Kuliev A, Verlinsky Y: Neonatal outcome of preimplantation genetic diagnosis by polar body removal: the first 109 infants. Pediatrics 106:650-653 (2000).
20. Tepperberg J, Pettenati MJ, Rao PN, Lese CM, Rita D, Wyandt H, Gersen S, White B, Schoonmaker MM: Prenatal diagnosis using interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH): 2-year multi-center retrospective study and review of the literature. Prenat Diagn 21:293-301 (2001).
21. Thangavelu M, Chen PX, Pergament E: Hybridization of chromosome 18 alpha-satellite DNA probe to chromosome 22. Prenat Diagn 18:922-925 (1998).
22. Thein AT, Abdel-Fattah SA, Kyle PM, Soothill PW: An assessment of the use of interphase FISH with chromosome specific probes as an alternative to cytogenetics in prenatal diagnosis. Prenat Diagn 20:275-280 (2000).
23. Thilaganathan B, Sairam S, Ballard T, Peterson C, Meredith R: Effectiveness of prenatal chromosomal analysis using multicolor fluorescent in situ hybridisation. BJOG 107:262-266 (2000).
24. Tsuchiya K, Schueler MG, Dev GV: Familial X centromere variant resulting in false-positive prenatal diagnosis of monosomy X by interphase FISH. Prenat Diagn 21:852-855 (2001).
25. Ulmer R, Pfeiffer RA, Kollert A, Beinder E: Aneuploidiediagnostik mittels Fluoreszenz-insitu-Hybridisierung (FISH); Stellenwert bei Schwangerschaften mit erhöhtem Risiko für Chromosomenaberrationen. Z Geburtsh Neonatol 204:1-7 (2000).
26. Verlinsky Y, Cieslak J, Ivakhnenko V, Evsikov S, Wolf G, White M, Lifchez A, Kaplan B, Moise J, Valle J, Ginsberg N, Strom C, Kuliev A: Chromosomal abnormalities in the first and second polar body. Mol Cell Endocrinol 183 Suppl 1:47-49 (2001).
27. Wells D, Escudero T, Levy B, Hirschhorn K, Delhanty JD, Munne S: First clinical application of comparative genomic hybridization and polar body testing for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of aneuploidy. Fertil Steril 78:543-549 (2002).
28. Weremowicz S, Sandstrom DJ, Morton CC, Niedzwiecki CA, Sandstrom MM, Bieber FR: Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for rapid detection of aneuploidy: experience in 911 prenatal cases. Prenat Diagn 21:262-269 (2001).
29. Winsor EJT, Dyack S, Wood-Burgess EM, Ryan G: Risk of false-positive prenatal diagnosis using interphase FISH testing: hybridization of alpha satellite X probe to chromosome 19. Prenat Diagn 19:832-836 (1999).