Measuring the quality of dying and death: Methodological considerations and recent findings

Current Opinion in Critical Care

Volumn 12, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 381-387

  Engelberg, Ruth A ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

End of life care; Outcome and process assessment; Quality of dying and death

Indexed keywords

DEATH; DYING; HOSPITAL COST; HUMAN; LENGTH OF STAY; METHODOLOGY; PATIENT ASSESSMENT; PATIENT CARE; QUALITY OF LIFE; REVIEW;

ADVANCE CARE PLANNING; DEATH; HUMANS; INTENSIVE CARE; INTENSIVE CARE UNITS; LENGTH OF STAY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; TERMINAL CARE;

EID: 33748439392     PISSN: 10705295     EISSN: 15317072     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.ccx.0000244114.24000.bc     Document Type: Review

References (81)

1. Carlet J, Thijs LG, Antonelli M, et al. Challenges in end-of-life care in the ICU. Statement of the 5th International Consensus Conference in Critical Care: Brussels, Belgium, April 2003. Intensive Care Med 2004; 30:770-784.
2. The SUPPORT Principal Investigators. A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients: The study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments (SUPPORT). JAMA 1995; 274:1591-1598.
3. Desbiens NA, Wu AW. Pain and suffering in seriously ill hospitalized patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 2000; 48:S183-S186.
4. Nelson JE, Danis M. End-of-life care in the intensive care unit: where are we now? Crit Care Med 2001; 29 (2 Suppl):N2-N9.
5. Teno JM, Clarridge BR, Casey V, et al. Family perspectives on end-of-life care at the last place of care. JAMA 2004; 291:88-93.
6. Donaldson MS, Field MJ. Measuring quality of care at the end of life. Arch Intern Med 1998; 158:121-128.
7. Asch DA, Hansen-Flaschen J, Lanken P. Decisions to limit or continue life-sustaining treatment by critical care physicians in the United States: Conflicts between physicians' practices and patients' wishes. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995; 151:288-292.
8. Teno JM, Fisher E, Hamel MB, et al. Decision-making and outcomes of prolonged ICU stays in seriously ill patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 2000; 48:S70-S74.
9. Azoulay E, Chevret S, Leleu G, et al. Half the families of intensive care unit patients experience inadequate communication with physicians. Crit Care Med 2000; 28:3044-3049.
10. Boyle DK, Miller PA, Forbes-Thompson SA. Communication and end-of-life care in the intensive care unit: patient, family, and clinician outcomes. Crit Care Nurs Q 2005; 28:302-316. This is a comprehensive review of the research on communication interventions in ICU settings, with a useful chart summarizing current studies and findings. The authors conclude with important suggestions for future directions.
11. Teno JM, Mor V, Ward N, et al. Bereaved family member perceptions of quality of end-of-life care in U.S. regions with high and low usage of intensive care unit care. J Am Geriatr Soc 2005; 53:1905-1911. This is one of a series of findings using the Mortality Follow-Back data set, with important insights into regional variation in the quality of end-of-life care as reported by families.
12. Singer PA, Martin DK, Kelner M. Quality end-of-life care: Patients' perspective. JAMA 1999; 281:163-168.
13. Bowman KW, Martin DK, Singer PA. Quality end-of-life care. J Eval Clin Pract 2000; 6:51-61.
14. Moss AH. Measuring the quality of dying. J Palliat Med 2001; 4:149-151.
15. Steinhauser KE, Clipp EC, McNeilly M, et al. In search of a good death: observations of patients, families, and providers. Ann Intern Med 2000; 132:825-832.
16. Steinhauser KE, Christakis NA, Clipp EC, et al. Factors considered important at the end of life by patients, family, physicians, and other care providers. JAMA 2000; 284:2476-2482.
17. Curtis JR. The "patient-centered" outcomes of critical care: what are they and how should they be used? New Horizons 1998; 6:26-32.
18. Lynn J. Measuring quality of care at the end of life: A statement of principles. J Am Geriatr Soc 1997; 45:526-527.
19. Field MJ, Cassel CK, editors. Approaching death: Improving care at the end of life. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1997.
20. Clarke EB, Curtis JR, Luce JM, et al. Quality indicators for end-of-life care in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 2003; 31:2255-2262.
21. National Consensus Project for Quality Palliative Care. Clinical practice guidelines for quality palliative care: executive summary. J Palliat Med 2004; 7:611-627.
22. Rubenfeld GD, Curtis JR. For the End-of-Life Care in the ICU Working Group. End of life care in the intensive care unit: A research agenda. Crit Care Med 2001; 29:2001-2006.
23. Morrison RS. Healthcare system factors affecting end-of-life care. J Palliat Med 2005; 8 (Suppl 1):S79-S87. This is one of the review papers produced by the NIH State of the Science End-of-Life Care Conference, evaluating the research on the effectiveness of palliative care services in end-of-life care.
24. Morrison RS, Siu AL, Leipzig RM, et al. The hard task of improving the quality of care at the end of life. Arch Intern Med 2000; 160:743-747.
25. Teno JM, Byock IR, Field MJ. Research agenda for developing measures to examine quality of life of patients diagnosed with life-limiting illness. J Pain Symptom Manage 1999; 17:75-82.
26. Pronovost PJ, Miller MR, Dorman T, et al. Developing and implementing measures of quality of care in the intensive care unit. Curr Opin Crit Care 2001; 7:297-303.
27. Treece PD, Engelberg RA, Crowley L, et al. Evaluation of a standardized order form for the withdrawal of life support in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 2004; 32:1141-1148.
28. Curtis JR, Patrick DL, Shannon SE, et al. The family conference as a focus to improve communication about end-of-life care in the intensive care unit: Opportunities for improvement. Crit Care Med 2001; 29:N26-N33.
29. Curtis JR, Engelberg RA, Wenrich MD, et al. Studying communication about end-of-life care during the ICU family conference: Development of a framework. J Crit Care 2002; 17:147-160.
30. McDonagh JR, Elliott TB, Engelberg RA, et al. Family satisfaction with family conferences about end-of-life care in the ICU: Increased proportion of family speech is associated with increased satisfaction. Crit Care Med 2004; 32:1484-1488.
31. Curtis JR, Engelberg RA, Wenrich MD, et al. Missed opportunities during family conferences about end-of-life care in the intensive care unit. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2005; 171:844-849. This study used direct observation of physician-family conferences to identify opportunities for improvement in communication.
32. Lilly CM, Sonna LA, Haley KJ, Massaro AF. Intensive communication: four-year follow-up from a clinical practice study. Crit Care Med 2003; 31 (5 Suppl):S394-S399.
33. Lilly CM, De Meo DL, Sonna LA, et al. An intensive communication intervention for the critically ill. Am J Med 2000; 109:469-475.
34. Heyland DK, Rocker GM, Dodek PM, et al. Family satisfaction with care in the intensive care unit: results of a multiple center study. Crit Care Med 2002; 30:1413-1418.
35. Barnato AE, McClellan MB, Kagay CR, Garber AM. Trends in inpatient treatment intensity among Medicare beneficiaries at the end of life. Health Serv Res 2004; 39:363-375.
36. Fowler JF, Coppola KM, Teno JM. Methodological challenges for measuring quality of care at the end of life. J Pain Symptom Manage 1999; 17:114-119.
37. Steinhauser KE, Clipp EC, Tulsky JA. Evolution in measuring the quality of dying. J Palliat Med 2002; 5:407-414.
38. Teno JM. Measuring end-of-life care outcomes retrospectively. J Palliat Med 2005; 8 (Suppl 1):S42-S49. This is an excellent review of the advantages and disadvantages of retrospective approaches in end-of-life research, with an emphasis on reliability and validity associated with follow-back designs. It was produced as one of the review papers commissioned by the NIH State of the Science End-of-Life Care Conference.
39. Steinhauser KE. Measuring end-of-life care outcomes prospectively. J Palliat Med 2005; 8 (Suppl 1):S30-S41. This is another of the papers produced for the NIH State of the Science End-of-Life Care Conference. The authors evaluate the literature and future directions of prospective approaches in end-of-life research including the need for longitudinal studies, studies of proxy reporting and population-based research.
40. Addington-Hall J, McPherson C. After-death interviews with surrogates/ bereaved family members: some issues of validity. J Pain Symptom Manage 2001; 22:784-790.
41. McPherson CJ, Addington-Hall JM. Judging the quality of care at the end of life: can proxies provide reliable information? Soc Sci Med 2003; 56:95-109.
42. Engelberg RA, Patrick DL, Curtis JR. Correspondence between patients' preferences and surrogates' understandings for dying and death. J Pain Symptom Manage 2005; 30:498-509. The authors examine the strength of the relationship between patient and proxy for experiences important to a quality death and report moderate associations.
43. Takesaka J, Crowley R, Casarett D. What is the risk of distress in palliative care survey research? J Pain Symptom Manage 2004; 28:593-598.
44. Levy CR, Ely EW, Payne K, et al. Quality of dying and death in two medical ICUs: perceptions of family and clinicians. Chest 2005; 127:1775-1783. The authors examine the quality of dying and death from family and clinician respondents and report significant differences based on the type of respondent.
45. Tilden VP, Tolle S, Drach L, Hickman S. Measurement of quality of care and quality of life at the end of life. Gerontologist 2002; 42 (Spec No 3):71-80.
46. Hinton J. How reliable are relatives' retrospective reports of terminal illness? Patients' and relatives' accounts compared. Soc Sci Med 1996; 43:1229-1236.
47. Casarett DJ, Crowley R, Hirschman KB. Surveys to assess satisfaction with end-of-life care: Does timing matter? J Pain Symptom Manage 2003; 25:128-132.
48. Lorenz K, Lynn J, Morton SC, et al. End-of-life care and outcomes. Evidence report/technology assessment. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2004. Report No.: 110.
49. Ferrell BR. Overview of the domains of variables relevant to end-of-life care. J Palliat Med 2005; 8 (Suppl 1):S22-S29. The author provides a synthesis of key concepts and domains used to measure the quality of end-of-life care, with a suggested framework for future research. Part of the NIH State of the Science End-of-Life Care Conference papers.
50. Casarett D. Ethical considerations in end-of-life care and research. J Palliat Med 2005; 8 (Suppl 1):S148-S160. The author provides an excellent review of the ethical concerns associated with end-of-life research, with practical suggestions for reducing burdens and enhancing the research's value for subjects. Another of the review papers produced by the NIH State of the Science End-of-Life Care Conference.
51. Curtis JR, Engelberg RA. Measuring success of interventions to improve the quality of end-of-life care in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med (in press).
52. Schneiderman LJ. Ethics consultation in the intensive care unit. Curr Opin Crit Care 2005; 11:600-604.
53. Campbell ML, Guzman JA. A proactive approach to improve end-of-life care in a medical intensive care unit for patients with terminal dementia. Crit Care Med 2004; 32:1839-1843.
54. Hall RI, Rocker GM, Murray D. Simple changes can improve conduct of end-of-life care in the intensive care unit. Can J Anaesth 2004; 51:631-636.
55. Pronovost P, Berenholtz S, Dorman T, et al. Improving communication in the ICU using daily goals. J Crit Care 2003; 18:71-75.
56. Back AL, Li YF, Sales AE. Impact of palliative care case management on resource use by patients dying of cancer at a Veterans Affairs medical center. J Palliat Med 2005; 8:26-35. The authors evaluate the effect of a palliative care service on professionally-determined outcomes using electronic medical record data bases.
57. Campbell ML, Guzman JA. Impact of a proactive approach to improve end-of-life care in a medical ICU. Chest 2003; 123:266-271.
58. Schneiderman LJ, Gilmer T, Teetzel HD, et al. Effect of ethics consultations on nonbeneficial life-sustaining treatments in the intensive care setting: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2003; 290:1166-1172.
59. Ahrens T, Yancey V, Kollef M. Improving family communications at the end of life: implications for length of stay in the intensive care unit and resource use. Am J Crit Care 2003; 12:317-323.
60. Gilmer T, Schneiderman LJ, Teetzel H, et al. The costs of nonbeneficial treatment in the intensive care setting. Health Aff (Millwood) 2005; 24:961-971. The authors report on costs of care and lengths of stay, professionally- determined outcomes of care, that are associated with the implementation of ethics consultations for patients who do not survive ICU stays.
61. Rady MY, Johnson DJ. Admission to intensive care unit at the end-of-life: is it an informed decision? Palliat Med 2004; 18:705-711.
62. Paice JA, Muir JC, Shott S. Palliative care at the end of life: comparing quality in diverse settings. Am J Hosp Palliat Care 2004; 21:19-27.
63. Pronovost P, Angus DC. Economics of end-of-life care in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 2001; 29 (2 Suppl):N46-N51.
64. Angus DC, Rubenfeld GD, Roberts MS, et al. Understanding costs and cost-effectiveness in the ICU: Report from the Second American Thoracic Society Workshop on Outcomes Research. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002; 165:540-550.
65. Bryce CL, Loewenstein G, Arnold RM, et al. Quality of death: assessing the importance placed on end-of-life treatment in the intensive-care unit. Med Care 2004; 42:423-431.
66. Burns JP, Mello MM, Studdert DM, et al. Results of a clinical trial on care improvement for the critically ill. Crit Care Med 2003; 31:2107-2117.
67. Bailey FA, Burgio KL, Woodby LL, et al. Improving processes of hospital care during the last hours of life. Arch Intern Med 2005; 165:1722-1727.
68. Bookbinder M, Blank AE, Arney E, et al. Improving end-of-life care: development and pilot-test of a clinical pathway. J Pain Symptom Manage 2005; 29:529-543.
69. Glavan BJ, Engelberg RA, DeRuiter CJ, Curtis JR. Using the medical record to evaluate the quality of end-of-life care in the intensive care unit [abstract]. Proc Am Thorac Soc 2006; 3:A217. Family-centered evaluations of the quality of dying and death are found to be significantly associated with a number of process variables in the medical record.
70. DeRuiter CJ, Engelberg RA, Wall RJ, Curtis JR. Predictors of family satisfaction with decision-making for patients who die in the ICU [abstract]. Proc Am Thorac Soc 2006; 3:A832.
71. Puntillo K. Pain assessment and management in the critically ill: wizardry or science? Am J Crit Care 2003; 12:310-316.
72. Puntillo K, Neighbor M, O'Neil N, Nixon R. Accuracy of emergency nurses in assessment of patients' pain. Pain Manag Nurs 2003; 4:171-175.
73. Desbiens NA, Mueller-Rizner N. How well do surrogates assess the pain of seriously ill patients? Crit Care Med 2000; 28:1347-1352.
74. Mularski RA. Pain management in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Clin 2004; 20:381-401; viii.
75. Teno JM, Casey VA, Welch LC, Edgman-Levitan S. Patient-focused, family-centered end-of-life medical care: Views of the guidelines and bereaved family members. J Pain Symptom Manage 2001; 22:738-751.
76. Patrick DL, Curtis JR, Engelberg RA, et al. Measuring and improving the quality of dying and death. Ann Intern Med 2003; 139:410-415.
77. Curtis JR, Patrick DL, Engelberg RA, et al. A measure of the quality of dying and death: Initial validation using after-death interviews with family members. J Pain Symptom Manage 2002; 24:17-31.
78. Mularski RA, Curtis JR, Osborne ML, et al. Agreement among family members in their assessment of the quality of dying and death. J Pain Symptom Manage 2004; 28:306-315.
79. Hodde NM, Engelberg RA, Treece PD, et al. Factors associated with nurse assessment of the quality of dying and death in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 2004; 32:1648-1653.
80. Mularski RA, Heine CE, Osborne ML, et al. Quality of dying in the ICU: ratings by family members. Chest 2005; 128:280-287. The researchers report on significant components contributing to families' evaluations of a quality death, including whole-person concerns, preparation for death and appropriate aggressiveness of care.
81. National Institutes of Health State-of-the-Science Conference statement. Improving End-of-Life Care. December 6-8, 2004. J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother 2005; 19:75-83. This presents a summary of the findings from this important conference assessing the current state of the science on end-of-life care, focusing on past accomplishments and future directions for measuring and improving the quality of end-of-life care.