A secret formula, a rogue patent and public knowledge about nerve gas: Secrecy as a spatial-epistemic tool

Social Studies of Science

Volumn 36, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 691-722

  Balmer, Brian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Chemical weapons; Patents; Public knowledge; Secrecy; Security

Indexed keywords

EID: 33748430938     PISSN: 03063127     EISSN: 14603659     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0306312706063786     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Agar, Jon & Brian Balmer (1998) 'British Scientists and the Cold War: The Defence Policy Research Committee and Information Networks, 1947-1963', Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences 28: 209 - 252.
2. Balmer, Brian (2004) 'How Does an Accident Become an Experiment? Secret Science and the Exposure of the Public to Biological Warfare Agents', Science as Culture 13 (2). 197 - 228.
3. Belt, Henk van den (1989) 'Action at a Distance: A.W. Hofmann and the French Patent Disputes about Aniline Red (1860-1863), or How a Scientist may Influence Legal Decisions Without Appearing in Court', in R. Smith & B. Wynne (eds), Expert Evidence: Interpreting Science in the Law (London: Routledge). 184 - 209.
4. Bowker, Geof (1994) 'What's in a Patent?', in W. Bijker & J. Law (eds), Shaping Technology/ Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press). 53 - 74.
5. Cambrosio, Alberto, Peter Keating & Michael Mackenzie (1990) 'Scientific Practice in the Courtroom: The Construction of Sociotechnical Identities in a Biotechnology Patent Dispute', Social Problems 37: 301 - 319.
6. Carter, Gradon & Brian Balmer (1999) 'Chemical and Biological Warfare and Defence, 1945-1990', in R. Bud & P. Gummett (eds), Cold War, Hot Science: Applied Research in Britain's Defence Laboratories 1945-1990 (London: Routledge). 295 - 338.
7. Carter, Gradon & Graham Pearson (1996) 'North Atlantic Chemical and Biological Research Collaboration: 1916-1995', Journal of Strategic Studies 19: 74 - 103.
8. Chalk, Rosemary (1985) 'Overview: AAAS Project on Openness and Secrecy in Science and Technology', Science, Technology, & Human Values 10 (2). 28 - 35.
9. Cloud, John (2001) 'Imaging the World in a Barrel: CORONA and the Clandestine Convergence of the Earth Sciences', Social Studies of Science 31 (2). 231 - 251.
10. Collins, H.M. (1985) Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice ( London and Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.).
11. Collins, Harry & Trevor Pinch (1998) 'A Clean Kill? The Role of Patriot in the Gulf War', in The Golem at Large: What You Should Know About Technology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). 7 - 29.
12. Croddy, Eric, Clarisa Perez-Armendariz & John Hart (2001) Chemical and Biological Warfare: A Comprehensive Survey for the Concerned Citizen ( New York: Springer ).
13. Dennis, Michael A. (1994) '"Our First Line of Defense": Two University Laboratories in the Postwar American State', Isis 85 (3). 427 - 455.
14. Department of the Army (2005) Classification of Former Chemical Warfare, Chemical and Biological Defense, and Nuclear, Biological and Chemical Contamination Survivability Information, Army Regulation 380-386 ( Washington, DC: Department of the Army ).
15. Eden, Lynn (2004) Whole World on Fire: Organizations, Knowledge and Nuclear Weapons Devastation ( Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press ).
16. Galison, Peter (2004) 'Removing Knowledge', Critical Inquiry 31 (1). 229 - 243.
17. Gregory, Jane & Steve Miller (1998) Science in Public: Communication, Culture and Credibility ( New York: Plenum ).
18. Grint, Keith & Steve Woolgar (1997) The Machine at Work: Technology, Work and Organization ( Cambridge: Polity ).
19. Gummett, Philip (1990) 'Issues for STS Raised by Defence Science and Technology Policy', Social Studies of Science 20: 541 - 558.
20. Gusterson, Hugh (1998) Nuclear Rites: A Weapons Laboratory at the End of the Cold War (Reprint Edn) ( Berkeley, CA: University of California Press ).
21. Harris, Robert & Jeremy Paxman (1982) A Higher Form of Killing: The Secret Story of Gas and Germ Warfare ( London: Chatto and Windus ).
22. Hennessy, Peter (2001) Whitehall ( London: Pimlico ).
23. Hilgartner, Stephen (2000) Science on Stage: Expert Advice as Public Drama ( Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press ).
24. Hope, Adrian (1975) 'Patently Ridiculous', New Scientist (16 January). 131 - 132.
25. Journal Editors and Authors Group (2003) 'Statement of Scientific Publication and Security', Science 299: 1149-1149 (also published in Natureand Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences).
26. Kaiser, David (2005) 'The Atomic Secret in Red Hands? American Suspicions of Theoretical Physicists During the Early Cold War', Representations 90 (1). 28 - 60.
27. Latour, Bruno (1983) 'Give Me a Laboratory and I will Raise the World', in K.D. Knorr-Cetina & M.J. Mulkay (eds), Science Observed: Perspectives on the Social Studies of Science (London: Sage Publications). 141 - 170.
28. Livingstone, David (2003) Putting Science in Its Place: Geographies of Scientific Knowledge ( Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press ).
29. Luhmann, Niklas (1994) 'Politicians, Honesty and the Higher Amorality of Politics', Theory, Culture & Society 11: 25 - 36.
30. Lynch, Michael & David Bogen (1996) The Spectacle of History: Speech, Text, and Memory at the Iran-Contra Hearings ( Durham, NC: Duke University Press ).
31. MacKenzie, Donald (1990) Inventing Accuracy: A Historical Sociology of Nuclear Missile Guidance ( Cambridge, MA: MIT Press ).
32. MacKenzie, Donald & Graham Spinardi (1995) 'Tacit Knowledge, Weapons Design, and the Uninvention of Nuclear Weapons', American Journal of Sociology 101 (1). 44 - 99.
33. McLeish, Caitriona (1997) The Governance of Dual-Use Technologies in Chemical Warfare, Unpublished MSc Dissertation, SPRU, University of Sussex.
34. Mol, Anne-Marie (2002) The Body Multiple: Ontology and Medical Practice ( Durham, NC: Duke University Press ).
35. Mulkay, Michael (1989) 'Don Quixote's Double: A Self-Exemplifying Text', in S. Woolgar (ed.). Knowledge and Reflexivity: New Frontiers In the Sociology of Knowledge ( London: Sage Publications ).
36. Myers, Greg (1995) 'From Discovery to Invention: The Writing and Re-writing of Two Patents', Social Studies of Science 25 (1). 57 - 105.
37. National Academy of Sciences (2004) Biotechnology Research in an Age of Terrorism: Confronting the Dual-Use Dilemma (The 'Fink' Report) ( Washington, DC: National Academies Press ).
38. Norman, Colin (1975) 'USA Ratifies Chemical Warfare Protocol', Nature 253 (10 January). 82 - 83.
39. O'Dell, Tom H. (1994) Inventions and Official Secrecy: A History of Patents in the United Kingdom ( Oxford: Clarendon Press ).
40. Perry-Robinson, Julian (1975) 'Behind the VX Disclosure', New Scientist (9 January). 50-50.
41. Polanyi, Michael (1958) Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy ( Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press ).
42. Rappert, Brian (2001) 'The Distribution and the Resolution of the Ambiguities of Technology; or Why Bobby Can't Spray', Social Studies of Science 31 (4). 557 - 592.
43. Rappert, Brian (2003) 'Coding Ethical Behaviour: The Challenges of Biological Weapons', Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (4). 453 - 470.
44. Rappert, Brian (2005) 'Prohibitions, Weapons and Controversy: Managing The Problems of Ordering', Social Studies of Science 35 (2). 211 - 240.
45. Reppy, Judith (ed.) (1999) Secrecy and Knowledge Production. Cornell University Peace Studies Program. Occasional Paper No. 23.
46. Roland, Alex (1995) 'Science, Technology and War', Technology and Culture 36 (2). Suppl., 83 - 100.
47. Royal Society and Wellcome Trust (2004) Do No Harm: Reducing the Potential for the Misuse of Life Science Research. Report of a Royal Society-Wellcome Trust meeting held at the Royal Society on 7 October 2004 ( London: Royal Society ).
48. Sapolsky, Harvey (1977) 'Science, Technology and Military Policy', in I. Spiegel-Rosing & D. de Solla Price (eds), Science, Technology and Society: A Cross-Disciplinary Perspective (London: Sage Publications). 443 - 471.
49. Shapin, Steven (1998) 'Placing the View From Nowhere: Historical and Sociological Problems in the Location of Science', Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 23: 1 - 8.
50. Shils, Edward (1996 [1956]) The Torment of Secrecy: Background and Consequences of American Security Policies ( New York: Ivan R. Dee, Inc. ).
51. Simmel, Georg (1950) 'The Secret and the Secret Society', in K.W. Wolf (ed.), The Sociology of Georg Simmel (New York: Free Press). 307 - 376.
52. Smit, Wim A. (1995) 'Science, Technology and the Military: Relations in Transition', in S. Jasanoff, G.E. Markle, J. Petersen & T. Pinch (eds), Handbook of Science and Technology Studies (London: Sage Publications). 598 - 626.
53. Taussig, Michael (1999) Defacement: Public Secrecy and the Labor of the Negative ( Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press ).
54. Tucker, Jonathan B. (1994) 'Dilemmas of a Dual-use Technology: Toxins in Medicine and Warfare', Politics and the Life Sciences 13 (1). 51 - 62.
55. Vincent, David (1998) The Culture of Secrecy: Britain 1832-1998 ( Oxford: Oxford University Press ).
56. Wright, Susan & D.A. Wallace (2002) 'Secrecy in the Biotechnology Industry: Implications for the Biological Weapons Convention', in S. Wright (ed.), Biological Warfare and Disarmament: New Problems/New Perspectives (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield). 369 - 390.