The role of differentiation strategy in local telecommunication entry and market evolution: 1999-2002

Journal of Industrial Economics

Volumn 54, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 323-350

  Greenstein, Shane ^a   Mazzeo, Michael ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33748324712     PISSN: 00221821     EISSN: 14676451     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6451.2006.00291.x     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. Abel, J., 2002, 'Entry into Regulated Monopoly Markets: The Development of a Competitive Fringe in the Local Telephone Industry,' Journal of Law and Economics, 45, pp. 289-316.
2. Abel, J. and Clements, M., 2001, 'Entry Under Asymmetric Regulation,' Review of Industrial Organization, 19, pp. 227-42.
3. Bajari, P. and Fox, J. T., 2005, Complementarities and Collusion in an FCC Auction, (mimeo, University of Chicago).
4. Berry, S. T., 1992, 'Estimation of a Model of Entry in the Airline Industry,' Econometrica, 60, pp. 889-917.
5. Bresnahan, T. F. and Reiss, P. C., 1991, 'Entry and Competition in Concentrated Markets,' Journal of Political Economy, 99, pp. 977-1009.
6. Crandall, R. W., 2001, 'An Assessment of the Competitive Local Exchange Carriers Five Years after the Passage of the Telecommunications Act,' Report for the USTA by Criterion Economics, LLC., mimeo, Washington, D.C.
7. Crandall, R. W.; Ingraham, A. T. and Singer, H. J., 2004, 'Do Unbundling Policies Discourage CLEC Facilities-Based Investment?,' B.E. Journals in Economic Analysis and Policy.
8. Crandall, R. W. and Sidek, J. G., 2002, 'Is Structural Separation of Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers Necessary for Competition?,' Yale Journal on Regulation, 19, pp. 1-75.
9. Economides, N.; Seim, K. and Viard, V. B., 2004, Quantifying the Benefits of Entry into Local Telephone Service, (mimeo, Stanford University).
10. Federal Communication Commission 'Local Telephone Competition,' Industry Analysis Division, Common Carrier Bureau, http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/iatd/comp.html, down-loaded 8/2005.
11. Greenstein, S. and Mazzeo, M. J., 2003, 'Differentiation Strategy and Market Deregulation: Local Telecommunications Entry in the Late 1990s,' NBER Working Paper #9761, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
12. Gregg, B. J., 2001, 2003, 'A Survey of Unbundled Network Element Prices in the United States, Public Service Commission of West Virginia,' http://www.cad.state.wv.us/Une.%20Page.htm, downloaded 8/2005.
13. Jamison, M. A., 2004, Effects of Prices for Local Network Interconnection on Markets Structure in the U.S., (mimeo, University of Florida).
14. Mazzeo, M. J., 2002, 'Product Choice and Oligopoly Market Structure,' Rand Journal of Economics, 33, pp. 221-42.
15. Mini, F., 2001, 'The Role of Incentives for Opening Monopoly Markets: Comparing GTE and BOC Cooperation with Local Entrants,' Journal of Industrial Economics, 49, pp. 379-413.
16. th ed Chicago, IL.
17. th ed Chicago, IL.
18. Rosston, G. and Wimmer, B., 2001, 'From C to Shining C Competition and Cross-Subsidy in Communications,' in Compaine, B. and Greenstein, S. (eds.), Communications Policy in Transition: The Internet and Beyond, (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts).
19. Shiman, D. and Rosenworcel, J., 2002, 'Assessing the Effectiveness of Section 271 Five Years after the Telecommunications Act of 1996,' in Cranor, L. and Greenstein, S., eds., Communications Policy and Information Technology: Promises, Problems and Prospects, (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts).
20. Tamer, E. T., 2003, 'Incomplete Bivariate Discrete Response Model with Multiple Equilibria,' Review of Economic Studies, 70, pp. 147-167.
21. Wood, L.; Zarakas, W. and Sappington, D., 2004, 'Wholesale Pricing and Local Exchange Competition,' Info, 6, pp. 318-325.
22. Woroch, G., 2001, 'Local Network Competition,' in Cave, M.; Majumdar, S. and Vogelsang., I. eds., Handbook of Telecommunications Economics, Elsevier Publishing, Amsterdam.
23. Zolnierek, J.; Eisner, J. and Burton, E., 2001, 'An Empirical Examination of Entry Patterns in Local Telephone Markets,' Journal of Regulatory Economics, 19, pp. 143-59.