The role of incentives for opening monopoly markets: Comparing GTE and BOC cooperation with local entrants

Journal of Industrial Economics

Volumn 49, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 379-414

  Mini, Federico ^a  

^a GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035598968     PISSN: 00221821     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-6451.00154     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Besen, S. M. and Farrell, J., 1994, 'Choosing How to Compete: Strategies and Tactics in Standardization', Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8, pp. 117-131.
2. Burns, K. L. and Kovacs, A.-M., 1996, The Status of Agreements Between the Major LECs and CLECs, Janney Montgomery Scott Industry Update, December (Philadelphia).
3. Burns, K. L. and Kovacs, A.-M., 1997, The Status of Agreements Between the Major LECs and CLECs - Update Janney Montgomery Scott Industry Update, May (Philadelphia, PA).
4. Beard, R. T., Kaserman, D. L. and Mayo, J. W., 1999a, 'Regulation, Vertical Integration, and Sabotage', mimeo.
5. Beard, R. T., Kaserman, D. L. and Mayo, J. W., 1999b, 'The Role of Resale Entry in Promoting Local Exchange Competition', Telecommunications Policy, 22, pp. 315-326.
6. Crémer, J., Rey, P. and Tirole, J., 1999, 'Connectivity in the Commercial Internet'. Working Paper, Institut d'economic industrielle. Universite de Sciences Sociales de Toulouse.
7. Farrell, J., 1996, 'Creating Local Competition', Federal Communications Law Journal, 49:1, pp. 201-215.
8. Federal Communication Commission (FCC), 1996, First Report and Order ('Local Competition Order'). In the Matter of implementation of the Local Competition provisions in the Telecommunications Act of 1996. CC Docket No. 96-98 (Adopted August 1). (Released: August 8).
9. FCC, 1999, Local Competition: August 1999. Common Carrier Bureau (August).
10. Heckman, J. J., 1979, 'Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error', Econometrica, 47(1), pp. 153-161.
11. Hogg, R. V. and Craig, A. T., 1978, Introduction to Mathematical Statistics. New York, MacMillan.
12. Katz, M. L. and Shapiro, C., 1994, 'Systems Competition and Network Effects', Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8, pp. 93-115.
13. Laffont, J.-J., Rey, P. and Tirole, J., 1998a, 'Network Competition: I. Overview and Nondiscriminatory Pricing', RAND Journal of Economics, 29, pp. 1-37.
14. Laffont, J.-J., Rey, P. and Tirole, J., 1998b, 'Network Competition: II. Price Discrimination', RAND Journal of Economics, 29, pp. 38-56.
15. Manning, W. G., Duan, N. and Rogers, W. H., 1987, 'Monte Carlo Evidence on the Choice between Sample Selection and Two-Part Models', Journal of Econometrics, 35: pp. 59-82.
16. Marascuilo, L. and McSweeney, M., 1977, Non Parametric and Distribution-Free Methods for the Social Sciences. Monterey, California: Brooks Cole Publishing Co.
17. Melino, A., 1982, 'Testing for Sample Selection Bias', Review of Economic Studies, 49: pp. 151-153.
18. Schwartz, M., 1997, 'Competitive Implications of Bell Operating Company Entry Into Long-Distance Telecommunications Services'. Affidavit filed with the FCC along with the U.S. Department of Justice's Oklahoma Evaluation, May 14, 1997. Internet: http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/public/comments/sec271/bellsouth/ 1281.htm.
19. Schwartz, M., 2000, 'The Economic Logic for Conditioning Bell Entry into Long Distance on the Prior Opening of Local Markets', Journal of Regulatory Economics, forthcoming.
20. Telecommunications Act of 1996. Pub. L. 104-104, 110 Stat. 56 (codified at U.S.C. §151 et seq.).
21. Zolnierek, J., Eisner, J. and Burton, E., 1999, 'An Empirical Examination of Entry Patterns in Local Telephone Markets'. FCC Staff Working Paper, Washington DC.