Wholesale pricing and local exchange competition

Info

Volumn 6, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 318-325

  Wood, Lisa V ^a   Zarakas, William P ^a   Sappington, David E M ^b  

^a THE BRATTLE GROUP   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Exchange; Pricing; Telecommunication; United States of America

Indexed keywords

PRICE DETERMINATION; TELECOMMUNICATION;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES; WESTERN HEMISPHERE; WORLD;

EID: 23444459047     PISSN: 14636697     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/14636690410564825     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Abel, J. and Witkind-Davis, V. (2000), Geographic De-averaging of Wholesale Prices for Local Telephone Service in the United States:Some Guidelines for State Commissions, NRRI 00-01, National Regulatory Research Institute, Columbus, OH.
2. Duso, T. and Roller, L.H. (2003), "Endogenous deregulation: Evidence from OECD countries", Economics Letters, Vol. 81 No. 1, October, pp. 67-71.
3. Federal Communications Commission (1996), First Report and Order, in the Matter of Implementation of the Local Competition Provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, FCC 96-325, Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC, August.
4. Federal Communications Commission (2001a), Local Telephone Competition: Status as of December 31, 2000, Industry Analysis and Technology Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Washington, DC, May.
5. Federal Communications Commission (2001b), State by State Telephone Revenues and Universal Service Data, Common Carrier Bureau, Industry Analysis Division, Washington, DC, April.
6. Federal Communications Commission (2002a), Local Telephone Competition: Status as of June 30, 2001, Industry Analysis and Technology Division, Common Carrier Bureau, Washington, DC, February.
7. Federal Communications Commission (2002b), Local Telephone Competition: Status as of December 31, 2001, Industry Analysis and Technology Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Washington, DC, July.
8. Federal Communications Commission (2002c), Local Telephone Competition: Status as of June 30, 2002, Industry Analysis and Technology Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Washington, DC, December.
9. Federal Communications Commission (2002d), Trends in Telephone Service, Industry Analysis and Technology Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Washington, DC, May.
10. Federal Communications Commission (2003a), Trends in Telephone Service, Industry Analysis and Technology Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Washington, DC, August.
11. Federal Communications Commission (2003b), In the Matter of Review of the Section 251 Unbundling Obligations of Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers, CC Docket No. 01-338; Implementation of the Local Competition Provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, CC Docket No. 96-98; and Deployment of Wireline Services Offering Advanced Telecommunications Capability, CC Docket No. 98-147. FCC 03-36, Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC.
12. Federal Communications Commission (2003c), Local Telephone Competition: Status as of December 31, 2002, Industry Analysis and Technology Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Washington, DC, June.
13. Federal Communications Commission (2003d), Local Telephone Competition: Status as of June 30, 2003, Industry Analysis and Technology Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Washington, DC, December.
14. Gregg, B.J. (2003), "A survey of unbundled network element prices in the United States", updated July 1, available at: www.cad.state.wv.us/Une percent20Page.htm.
15. Jamison, M. (2003), "Effects of prices for local network interconnection market structure in the US", mimeo, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, May.
16. Krouse, C. and Park, J. (2003), "Local exchange competition and the Telecommunications Act of 1996", Information Economics and Policy, Vol. 15 No. 2, pp. 223-41.
17. Laffont, J.-J. and Tirole, J. (2002), Competition in Telecommunications, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
18. Mandy, D. and Sharkey, W. (2003), "Dynamic pricing and investment from static proxy models", Review of Network Economics, Vol. 2 No. 4, December, pp. 403-39.
19. Rodini, M., Ward, M. and Woroch, G. (2003), "Going mobile: substitutability between fixed and mobile access", Telecommunications Policy, Vol. 27 Nos 5-6, June-July, pp. 457-76.
20. UBS Warburg (2003), Wireline Postgame Analysis 5.0, November, UBS Warburg.
21. US Census Bureau, Population Division (2003), Annual Estimates of the Population for the United States and for Puerto Rico: April 1, 2000 to July 1, 2003, Table NST-EST2003-01, US Census Bureau, Population Division, Washington, DC, 18 December.