Medical care abandon factors in precursor lesions of cervical cancer;Motivos de abandono en el proceso de atención médica de lesiones precursoras de cáncer cervicouterino

Revista de Investigacion Clinica

Volumn 58, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 217-227

  Hernández Alemán, Francisco R ^a   Ornelas Bernal, Laura A ^a   Apresa García, Teresa ^b   Sánchez Garduño, Sandra ^b   Martínez Rodríguez, Oscar A ^b   Hernández Hernández, Dulce Ma ^b  

^a Coordinación de Áreas Médicas ^*  (Mexico)

^b INSTITUTO MEXICANO DEL SEGURO SOCIAL   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Cervical cancer; Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; Compliance; Treatment

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO DEATH; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONSULTATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEAR; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH CARE ACCESS; HEALTH CARE AVAILABILITY; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; INTERVIEW; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL CARE; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; PATIENT ABANDONMENT; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT INFORMATION; PATIENT REFERRAL; PRECANCER; PRIVACY; SOCIAL ASPECT; TREATMENT REFUSAL; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER; UTERINE CERVIX DYSPLASIA;

ADULT; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; COHORT STUDIES; FEAR; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HEALTH SERVICES ACCESSIBILITY; HUMANS; INTERVIEW, PSYCHOLOGICAL; MEXICO; MIDDLE AGED; MOTIVATION; PATIENT DROPOUTS; PATIENT EDUCATION; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; PATIENT SELECTION; PRECANCEROUS CONDITIONS; RISK FACTORS; TIME FACTORS; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS;

EID: 33748298915     PISSN: 00348376     EISSN: 00348376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Registro Histopatológico de Neoplasias en México. Secretaría de Salud. Dirección General de Epidemiología e Informática. 2001.
2. Kiviat N. Natural history of cervical neoplasia: Overview and update. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 175: 1099-104.
3. van Oortmarssen GJ, Habbema JD. Epidemiological evidence for age-dependent regression of pre-invasive cervical cancer. Br J Cancer 1991; 64: 559-65.
4. Boone CW, Kellof GJ, Steele VE. Natural history of intraepithelial neoplasia in humans with implications for cancer chemoprevention strategy. Cancer Res 1992; 52: 1651-9.
5. Wright TC Jr, Cox JT, Massad LS, Twiggs LB, Wilkinson EJ. 2001 Consensus Guidelines for the management of women with cervical cytological abnormalities. JAMA 2002; 287: 2120-9.
6. Cullen J, Schwartz MD, Lawrence WF, Selby JV, Mandelblatt JS. Short-Term Impact of Cancer Prevention and Screening Activities on Quality of Life. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22: 943-52.
7. McDonald TW, Neutens JJ, Fischer LM, Jessee D. Impact of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia diagnosis and treatment of self-esteem and body image. Gynecol Oncol 1989; 34: 345-9.
8. Eger RR, Peipert JF. Risk factor for noncompliance in a colposcopy clinic. J Reprod Med 1996; 41: 671-4.
9. Schofield MJ, Sanson-Fisher R, Halpin S, Redman S. Notification and follow-up Pap of test results: current practice and women's preferences. Prev Med 1994; 23: 276-83.
10. Padilla-Paz LA, Carlson JDO, Twiggs LB, Lonky N, Crum CP, Felix J, et al. Evidence supporting the current management guidelines for High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion Cytology. J Lower Genital Tract Dis 2004; 8: 139-46.
11. Cirisano FD. Management of pre-invasive disease of the cervix. Semin Surg Oncol 1999; 16: 222-7.
12. Nuovo J, Melnikow J, Willan AR, Chan BK. Treatment outcomes for squamous intraepithelial lesions. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2000; 68: 25-33.
13. Skinner EN, Gehrig PA, Van Le L. High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions: Abbreviating Postreatment Surveillance. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 103: 488-92.
14. Hagen B, Skjeldestad FE, Bratt H, Tingulstad S, Lie AK. C02 Laser ionization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade II-III: complications and efficacy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1998; 77: 558-63.
15. Reich O, Pickel H, Lahousen M, Tamussino K, Winter R. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III: long-term outcome after cold-knife ionization with clear margins. Obstet Gynecol 2001; 97: 428-30.
16. Keijser KG, Kenemans P, van der Zanden PH, Schijf C, Vooijs GP, Rolland R. Diathermy loop excision in the management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: diagnosis and treatment in one procedure. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 166: pp. 1281-7.
17. Marcus AC, Kaplan CP, Crane LA, Berek JS, Bernstein J, Gunning JE, et al. Reducing loss-to-follow-up among women with abnormal Pap smear. Result from a randomized trial testing and intensive follow-up protocol and economic incentives. Med Care 1998; 36: 397-410.
18. Rosenstock IM, Strecher VJ, Becker MH. Social learning theory and the health belief model. Health Educ Q 1988; 15: 175-83.
19. Austin LT, Ahmad F, McNally MJ, Stewart DE. Breast and cervical cancer screening in Hispanic women: A literature review using the health belief model. Womens Health Issues 2002; 12: 122-8.
20. Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-014-SSA2-1998. Para la prevención, detección, tratamiento, control y vigilancia epidemiológica del cáncer cérvico uterino. 1998.
21. Rothman K, Greenland S. Case-Control studies. In: Rothman K, Greenland S. Modern Epidemiology. 2nd edition. Philadelphia: Lippincot-Raven; 1998, 93-100.
22. SPSS, v 12. Statistical Package for Social Sciences. 2005.
23. Lockwood-Rayermann S. Characteristics of participation in cervical cancer screening. Cancer Nurs 2004; 27: 353-63.
24. Fiscella K, Franks P, Gold MR, Clancy CM. Inequality in quality: addressing socioeconomic, racial, and ethnic disparities in health Care. JAMA 2000; 283: 2579-84.
25. Olvera Rodriguez A, Quiroz Perez Q, Pérez Lopez JC, Morales VR. Displasia cervical y carcinoma cérvico uterine: Un reto para los servicios de salud. Ginecol Obstet Mex 1998; 66: 232-6.
26. Miller SM, Siejak KK, Schroeder CM, Lerman C, Hernandez E, Helm CW. Enhancing adherence following abnormal PAP smear among low-income minority women: a preventive telephone counseling strategy. J Natl Cancer Inst 1997; 21: 703-8.
27. Sardell AN, Trierweiler SJ. Disclosing the cancer diagnosis. Procedure that patients hopefulness. Cancer 1993; 72: 3355-65.
28. Lee J, Seow A, Ling SL, Peng LH. Improving adherence to regular pap smear screening among Asian women: a population-based study in Singapore. Health Educ Behav 2002; 29: 207-18.
29. Olsen MM. Family participation in posthospital care: women's work. J Psychosoc Oncol 1989; 7: 77-93.
30. Merrill JM. Access to high-tech health care. Ethics. Cancer 1991; 67: 1750-52.
31. Shetter AG. The fundamentals of patient assessment: the importance of the examination and the patient relationship. Clin Neurosurg 2004; 51: 26-9.
32. Petkova V. The role of information for improvement of patients' treatment in Bulgaria. Cent Eur J Public Health 2004; 12: 69-74.
33. Coyle N, Sculco L. Communication and the patient/physician relationship: a phenomenological inquiry. J Support Oncol 2003; 1: 206-15.
34. Massad LS, Meyer P, Hobbs J. Knowledge of cervical cancer screening among women attending urban colposcopy clinics. Cancer Detect Prev 1997; 21: 103-9.
35. Seffrin JR, Wilson JL, Bruce L, Black BL. Patient perceptions. Cancer 1991; 67(s): 1783-7.
36. Nelson K, Geiger AM, Mangione CM. Effect of health beliefs on delays in care for abnormal cervical cytology in a multi-ethnic population. J Gen Intern Med 2002; 17: 709-16.