High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions: Abbreviating posttreatment surveillance

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 103, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 488-492

  Skinner, Elizabeth N ^a   Gehrig, Paola A ^a   Van Le, Linda ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY; DEMOGRAPHY; DISEASE SEVERITY; EXCISION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH CARE COST; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL RECORD; PAPANICOLAOU TEST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RACE; RECURRENT DISEASE; RISK FACTOR; UTERINE CERVIX BIOPSY; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA IN SITU; UTERINE CERVIX DYSPLASIA; EVALUATION; METHODOLOGY; MONITORING; PATHOLOGY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; STANDARD; TIME; TUMOR RECURRENCE; UTERINE CERVIX TUMOR; VAGINA SMEAR;

ADULT; CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; PRACTICE GUIDELINES; TIME FACTORS; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS; VAGINAL SMEARS;

EID: 1842510694     PISSN: 00297844     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000114983.11562.08     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Wright TC, Cox JT, Massad LS, Twiggs LB, Wilkinson EJ; ASCCP-Sponsored Consensus Conference. 2001 Consensus guidelines for the management of women with cervical cytologic abnormalities. JAMA 2002;287:2120-9.
2. Huang LW, Hwang JL. A comparison between loop electrocautery excision procedure and cold knife conization for treatment of cervical dysplasia: residual disease in a subsequent hysterectomy specimen. Gynecol Oncol 1999; 73:12-5.
3. Giacalone PL, Laffargue F, Aligier N, Roger P, Combecal J, Daures JP. Randomized study comparing two techniques of conization: cold knife versus loop excision. Gynecol Oncol 1999;75:356-60.
4. Ferenczy A. Management of patients with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions. Cancer 1995;76(suppl 20): 1928-33.
5. Cervical cytology: evaluation and management of abnormalities. 2000 Compendium of Selected Publications. 2000. Technical Bulletin #183:330-6.
6. Dietrich CS 3rd, Yancey MK, Miyazawa K, Williams DL, Farley J. Risk factors for early cytologic abnormalities after loop electrocautery excision procedure. Obstet Gynecol 2002;99:188-92.
7. Flannelly G, Bolger B, Fawzi H, De Lopes AB, Monaghan JM. Follow up after large loop excision of the transformation zone: could schedules be modified according to risk of recurrence? Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2001;108:1025-30.
8. Gonzalez DI, Zahn CM, Retzloff MG, Moore WF, Kost ER, Snyder RR. Recurrence of dysplasia after loop electrosurgical excision procedures with long-term follow up. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;184:315-21.
9. Hanau CA, Bibbo M. The case for cytologic follow up after LEEP. Acta Cytol 1997;41:731-6.
10. Livasy CA, Maygarden SJ, Rajaratnam CT, Novotny DB. Predictors of recurrent dysplasia after a cervical loop electrocautery excision procedure for CIN 3: a study of margin, endocervical gland, and quadrant involvement. Mod Path 1999;12:233-8.
11. Zaitoun AM, McKee G, Coppen MJ, Thomas SM, Wilson PO. Completeness of excision and follow up cytology in patients treated with loop excision biopsy. J Clin Path 2000;53:191-6.
12. Gardeil F, Barry Walsh C, Prendiville W, Clinch J, Turner M. Persistent intraepithelial neoplasia after excision for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III. Obstet Gynecol 1997;89:419-22.
13. Felix JC, Muderspach LI, Duggan BD, Roman LD. The significance of positive margins in loop electrosurgery cone biopsy. Obstet Gynecol 1994;84:996-1000.
14. Biggig A, Haffenden DK, Sheehan AL, Codling BW, Read MD. Efficacy and safety of large-loop excision of the transformation zone. Lancet 1994;343:32-4.
15. Abulafia O, Pezzullo JC, Sherer DM. Performance of ThinPrep liquid-based cervical cytology in comparison with conventionally prepared Papanicolaou smears: a quantitative survey. Gynecol Oncol 2003;90:137-44.
16. Saslow D, Runowicz CD, Solomon D, Mosacki AB, Smith RA, Eyre HJ, et al. American Cancer Society guideline for the early detection of cervical neoplasia and cancer [review]. CA Cancer J Clin 2002;52:342-62.
17. Nasiell K, Nasiell M, Vaclavinkova V. Behavior of moderate cervical dysplasia during long-term follow-up. Obstet Gynecol 1983;61:609-14.