Prospective comparison of high-dose plateletpheresis with the latest apheresis systems on the same donors

Transfusion

Volumn 46, Issue 9, 2006, Pages 1601-1608

  Picker, Susanne Maria ^a   Radojska, Stela Marinova ^a   Gathof, Birgit Sybille ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; APHERESIS; ARTICLE; BLOOD DONOR; BLOOD SAMPLING; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HEMATOLOGICAL PROCEDURES; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL INSTRUMENTATION; TECHNIQUE; THROMBOCYTE; THROMBOCYTOPHERESIS;

ADULT; BLOOD COMPONENT REMOVAL; BLOOD DONORS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; ERYTHROCYTE COUNT; EVALUATION STUDIES; FEMALE; FILTRATION; HEMATOCRIT; HUMANS; LEUKOCYTE COUNT; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PLATELET COUNT; PLATELETPHERESIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 33748289466     PISSN: 00411132     EISSN: 15372995     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2006.00928.x     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Krailadsiri P, Seghatchian J. Are all leukodepleted platelet concentrates equivalent? Vox Sang 2000;78:171-5.
2. Elting LS, Martin CG, Kurtin DJ. The Bleeding Risk Index: a clinical prediction rule to guide the prophylactic use of platelet transfusions in patients with lymphoma or solid tumours. Cancer 2002;74:185-9.
3. Zingsem J, Moog R. Praeparative haemapheresis and donor safety. Transfus Med Hemother 2004;31:5-6.
4. Snyder EL, Elfath MD, Taylor H, et al. Collection of two units of leukoreduced RBCs from a single donation with a portable multiple-component collection system. Transfusion 2003;43:1695-705.
5. Popovsky MA. Multicomponent apheresis blood collection in the United States: current status and future directions. Transfus Apher Sci 2005;32:299-304.
6. Valbonesi M, Bruni R, Bo A, et al. Double plateletpheresis (DPA) and tailored RBC collection with the Excel-Pro: preliminary results. Transfus Apher Sci 2001;24:71-3.
7. Pamphilon DH, Rider JR, Barbara JAJ, Williamson ML. Prevention of transfusion-transmitted cytomegalovirus infection. Transfus Med 1999;9:115-23.
8. Moog R. Implementation of concurrent red blood cell and platelet collection by apheresis in a university haemapheresis unit. Transfus Med 2004;14:145-50.
9. Standards for blood banks and transfusion services. 22nd ed. Bethesda: American Association of Blood Banks; 2003.
10. German Medical Association and the Paul Ehrlich Institute. Guidelines for the collection of blood and blood components and the usage of blood products (hemotherapy). Rev. ed. Cologne: Deutscher Ärzteverlag; 2005.
11. Guide to the preparation use and quality assurance of blood components. 11th ed. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Press; 2005.
12. Performance of preparative cellular hemapheresis for the collection of blood cell concentrates. II. Recommendations of the German Society for Transfusion Medicine and Immunohematology for preparative white cell and plateletpheresis. Infus Ther Transfus Med 1998;25:376-82.
13. Makar YF, Butler MO, Cockersole GM, Gabra G, Serevitch JM. National audit of citrate toxicity in plateletpheresis donors. Transfus Med 2002;12:187-91.
14. Murphy MF, Seghatchian J, Krailadsiri P, Howell C, Verjee S. Evaluation of Cobe Trima for the collection of blood components with particular reference to the in vitro characteristics of the red cell and platelet concentrates and the clinical responses to transfusion. Transfus Sci 2000;22:39-43.
15. Ringwald J, Zingsem J, Zimmermann R, et al. First comparison of productivity and citrate donor load between the Trima version 4 (dual-stage-filler) and the trima accel (single-stage-filler) in the same donors. Vox Sang 2003;85:267-75.
16. Burgstaler EA, Pineda AA, Potter BM, Brown R. Plateletapheresis with a next generation blood cell separator. J Clin Apher 1997;12:55-62.
17. Burgstaler EA, Pineda AA, Bryant SC. Prospective comparison of plateletapheresis using four apheresis systems on the same donors. J Clin Apher 1999;14:163-70.
18. Valbonesi M, Florio G, Ruzzenenti MR, et al. Multicomponent collection (MCC) with the latest hemapheresis apparatuses. Int J Artif Organs 1999;22:511-5.
19. Menichella G, Serafini R, Ciarli M, et al. A new blood donation strategy: automated blood collection (ABC). Int J Artif Organs 2001;24:173-7.
20. Moog R, Bartsch R, Müller N. Concurrent collection of inline filtered platelets and red blood cells by apheresis. Ann Hematol 2002;81:322-5.
21. Burgstaler EA, Winters JL, Pineda AA. Paired comparison of Gambro Trima Accel versus Baxter Amicus single-needle plateletpheresis. Transfusion 2004;44:1612-20.
22. Valbonesi M, Giannini G, Morelli R, Frisoni R, Capra C. Multicomponent collection as of 2005. Transfus Apher Sci 2005;32:287-97.
23. Bueno JL, Garcia F, Castro E, Barea L, Gonzalez R. A randomized crossover trial comparing three plateletpheresis machines. Transfusion 2005;45:1373-81.
24. Strasser EF, Schuster M, Egler K, et al. Frequently used plateletpheresis techniques result in variable target yields and platelet recruitment of donors. Transfusion 2005;45:788-97.
25. Zingsem J, Zimmermann R, Weisbach V, et al. Comparison of COBE white cell-reduction and standard platelet-pheresis protocols in the same donors. Transfusion 1997;37:1045-9.
26. Zingsem J, Zimmermann R, Weisbach V, et al. Comparison of a new WBC-reduction system and the standard plateletpheresis protocol in the same donors. Transfusion 2001;4:396-400.
27. Zingsem J, Weisbach V, Zimmermann R, et al. Preparation of fresh frozen plasma as a by-product of plateletpheresis. Transfusion 2002;42:81-6.
28. Benjamin RJ, Rojas P, Christma S, et al. Plateletapheresis efficiency. a comparison of the Spectra LRS and AMICUS separators. Transfusion 1999;39:895-9.
29. Moog R, Müller N, Goergens D. Platelet collection with the Amicus and AS.TC 204 blood cell separators. Transfusion 1998;38:285-9.
30. Moog R, Müller N. White cell reduction during plateletpheresis: a comparison of three blood cell separators. Transfusion 1999;39:572-7.
31. Fournel JJ, Zingsem J, Riggert J, et al. A multicenter evaluation of the routine use of a new white cell-reduction apheresis system for collection of platelets. Transfusion 1997;37:487-92.
32. Zeiler T, Zingsem J, Moog R, et al. Periodic alternating interface positioning to lower WBC contamination of apheresis platelet concentrates: a multicenter evaluation. Transfusion 2000;40:687-92.
33. Bueno JL, Barea L, Garcia F, Castro E. A comparison of PLT collections from two apheresis devices. Transfusion 2004;44:119-24.
34. Antoon M, Sibrowski W, Krakowitzky P. A prospective comparison of productivity between Trima® Accel™, Trima, version 4, and Amicus Crescendo (dual needle = DN) with the same donors. Transfusion 2003;43:64A.