A randomized crossover trial comparing three plateletpheresis machines

Transfusion

Volumn 45, Issue 8, 2005, Pages 1373-1381

  Bueno, José Luis ^a,b   García, Fernando ^a   Castro, Emma ^a   Barea, Luisa ^a   González, Rocío ^a  

^a HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO PUERTA DE HIERRO   (Spain)

^b Centro de Transfusion de Cruz Roja Espanola   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BLOOD DONOR; BLOOD FILTER; CHILL; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVULSION; CROSSOVER PROCEDURE; FEMALE; HEART ARRHYTHMIA; HUMAN; LEUKOCYTE; MALE; MUSCLE CRAMP; NAUSEA; PARESTHESIA; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SHIVERING; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; THROMBOCYTOPHERESIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; INSTRUMENTATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY;

CROSS-OVER STUDIES; HUMANS; PLATELETPHERESIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 23844553845     PISSN: 00411132     EISSN: 15372995     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2005.00215.x     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. McLeod BC, Price TH, Owen H, et al. Frequency of immediate adverse effects associated with apheresis donation. Transfusion 1998;38:938-43.
2. Makar YF, Butler MO, Cockersole GM, et al. National audit of citrate toxicity in plateletpheresis donors. Transfusion Med 2002;12:187-91.
3. Seghatchian J, Beard MJ, Krailadsiri P. Studies on the improvement of leucodepletion performance of the Haemonetics MCS+ for production of leucodepleted platelet concentrate. Platelets 2001;12:298-301.
4. Moog R. Fuji surge technique and continuous in-line filtration to improve the quality of single donor platelet concentrates. J Clin Apheresis 2002;17:199-203.
5. Benjamin RJ, Rojas P, Christmas S, et al. Plateletpheresis efficiency: a comparison of the spectra LRS and AMICUS separators. Transfusion 1999;39:895-9.
6. Fournel JJ, Zingsem J, Riggert J, et al. A multicenter evaluation of the routine use of a new white cell-reduction apheresis system for collection of platelets. Transfusion 1997;37:487-92.
7. Riggert J, Humpe A, Simson G, et al. Quality and safety of platelet apheresis concentrates produced with a new leukocyte reduction system. Vox Sang 1998;74:182-8.
8. Burgstaler EA, Pineda AA, Potter BM, et al. Plateletapheresis with a next generation blood cell separator. J Clin Apheresis 1997;12:55-62.
9. Moog R, Muller N, Goergens D. Platelet collection with the Amicus and the AS.TEC 204 blood cell separators. Transfusion 1998;38:285-9.
10. Moog R, Muller N. White cell reduction during plateletpheresis: a comparison of three blood cell separators. Transfusion 1999;39:572-7.
11. Yockey C, Murphy S, Eggers L, et al. Evaluation of the Amicus separator in the collection of apheresis platelets. Transfusion 1998;38:848-54.
12. Schooneman F. Deleukocytation of plateletpheresis concentrates obtained with the use of Amicus cell separators. Transfus Apheresis Sci 2001;25:61-2.
13. Ringwald J, Zingsem J, Zimmermann R, et al. First comparison of productivity and citrate donor load between the Trima version 4 (dual-stage filler) and the Trima Accel (single-stage filler) in the same donors. Vox Sang 2003;85: 267-75.
14. Jones H, Bandarenko N. Management of the therapeutic apheresis patient. In: Mcleod BC, editor. Apheresis: principles and practice. 2nd ed. Bethesda: American Association of Blood Banks; 2003. p. 253-82.
15. Bueno JL, Barea L, Garcia F, et al. A comparison of PLT collections from two apheresis devices. Transfusion 2004;44:119-24.
16. van der Meer PF, Gratama JW, van Delden CJ, et al. Comparison of five platforms for enumeration of residual leucocytes in leucoreduced blood components. Br J Haematol 2001;115:953-62.
17. Vachula M, Simpson SJ, Martinson JA, et al. A flow cytometric method for counting very low-levels of white cells in blood and blood components. Transfusion 1993;33:262-7.
18. Diggle PJ, Liang KY, Zeger SL. Analysis of longitudinal data. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1994.
19. Dumont LJ, Dzik WH, Rebulla P, et al. Practical guidelines for process validation and process control of white cell-reduced blood components: report of the Biomedical Excellence for Safer Transfusion (BEST) Working Party of the International Society of Blood Transfusion (ISBT). Transfusion 1996;36:11-20.
20. Antoon M, Sibrowski W, Krakowitzky P. A prospective comparison of productivity between Trima (R) Accel (TM), Trima, Version 4, and Amicus Crescendo (dual needle = DN) with the SAME DONORS. Transfusion 2003;43:64A.
21. Bertholf MF, Mintz PD. Comparison of plateletpheresis using two cell separators and identical donors. Transfusion 1989;29:521-3.
22. Burgstaler EA, Pineda AA, Bryant SC. Prospective comparison of plateletapheresis using four apheresis systems on the same donors. J Clin Apheresis 1999;14:163-70.
23. Burgstaler EA, Winters L, Pineda AA. Paired comparison of Gambro Trima Accel versus Baxter Amicus single-needle plateletpheresis. Transfusion 2004;44:1612-20.
24. Kautz H, Wienhausen V, Muller N. Comparison of plateletpheresis using Cobe Spectra System and Fresenius AS 104. Infusionsther Transfusionsmed 1992;19:59-60.
25. Peck K, Sappingfield C, Menitove J, et al. Evaluation of the Trima Accel automated blood collection system for procedure time, blood component collection efficiencies and donor comfort. Transfusion 2003;43:16A.
26. Varney SJ, Guest JF. The annual cost of blood transfusions in the UK. Transfusion Med 2003;13:205-18.
27. Guide to the preparation, use and quality assurance of blood components. 10th ed. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing; 2004.
28. Standards for blood banks and transfusion services. 22nd ed. Bethesda: American Association of Blood Banks; 2003.
29. Seghatchian J, Krailadsiri P. Factors influencing the outcome of leucodepletion system. Transfus Sci 2000;22:135-7.
30. Jacobson JL, McQuail EJ, Murphy RM, et al. Trima Accel: Improved platelet collection efficiency, split platelet collection rate, and donor and staff satisfaction. Transfusion 2003;43:15A.