Starch-synthase III family encodes a tandem of three starch-binding domains

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 65, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 27-31

  Palopoli, Nicolás ^a   Busi, María Victoria ^b   Fornasari, María Silvina ^a   Gomez Casati, Diego ^b   Ugalde, Rodolfo ^b   Parisi, Gustavo ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE QUILMES   (Argentina)

^b INSTITUTO DE INVESTIGACIONES BIOTECNOLÓGICAS   (Argentina)

Author keywords

Carbohydrate binding module family (CBM); Starch binding domain; Starch synthase III

Indexed keywords

STARCH; STARCH SYNTHASE; STARCH SYNTHASE III; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; VEGETABLE PROTEIN;

AMINO TERMINAL SEQUENCE; ARABIDOPSIS; ARTICLE; CARBOHYDRATE SYNTHESIS; CARBOXY TERMINAL SEQUENCE; ENZYME BINDING; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYTOCHEMISTRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN FAMILY; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARABIDOPSIS; ARABIDOPSIS PROTEINS; BASE SEQUENCE; BINDING SITES; GLUCOSYLTRANSFERASES; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, PROTEIN;

ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA;

EID: 33748273525     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.21007     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Ball SG, Morell MK. From bacterial glycogen to starch: understanding the biogenesis of the plant starch granule. Annu Rev Plant Biol 2003;54:207-233.
2. Zhang X, Myers AM, James MG. Mutations affecting starch synthase III in Arabidopsis alter leaf starch structure and increase the rate of starch synthesis. Plant Physiol 2005;138:663-674.
3. Ball S, Guan HP, James M, Myers A, Keeling P, Mouille G, Buleon A, Colonna P, Preiss J. From glycogen to amylopectin: a model for the biogenesis of the plant starch granule. Cell 1996;86:349-352.
4. Buschiazzo A, Ugalde JE, Guerin ME, Shepard W, Ugalde RA, Alzari PM. Crystal structure of glycogen synthase: homologous enzymes catalyze glycogen synthesis and degradation. EMBO J 2004;23:3196-3205.
5. Li Z, Mouille G, Kosar-Hashemi B, Rahman S, Clarke B, Gale KR, Appels R, Morell MK. The structure and expression of the wheat starch synthase III gene. Motifs in the expressed gene define the lineage of the starch synthase III gene family. Plant Physiol 2000;123:613-624.
6. Janecek S, Sevcik J. The evolution of starch-binding domain. FEES Lett 1999;456:119-125.
7. Coutinho PM, Henrissat B. The modular structure of cellulases and other carbohydrate-active enzymes: an integrated database approach. Genet Biochem Ecol Cellulose Degradation 1999:15-23.
8. Rodriguez-Sanoja R, Oviedo N, Sanchez S. Microbial starch-binding domain. Curr Opin Microbiol 2005;8:260-267.
9. Sorimachi K, Le Gal-Coeffet MF, Williamson G, Archer DB, Williamson MP. Solution structure of the granular starch binding domain of Aspergillus niger glucoamylase bound to beta-cyclodextrin. Structure 1997;5:647-661.
10. Ashikari T, Nakamura N, Tanaka Y, Kiuchi N, ShiBano Y, Tanaka T, Amachi T, Yoshizumi H. Rhizopus raw-starch-degrading glucoamylase: its cloning and expression in yeast. Agric Biol Chem 1986;50:957-964.
11. Abe A, Tonozuka T, Sakano Y, Kamitori S. Complex structures of Thermoactinomyces vulgaris R-47 alpha-amylase 1 with maltooligosaccharides demonstrate the role of domain N acting as a starch-binding domain. J Mol Biol 2004;335:811-822.
12. Bibel M, Brettl C, Gosslar U, Kriegshauser G, Liebl W. Isolation and analysis of genes for amylolytic enzymes of the hyperthermophilic bacterium Thermotoga maritima. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1998;158:9-15.
13. Coutinho PM, Reilly PJ. Glucoamylase structural, functional, and evolutionary relationships. Proteins 97;29:334-347.
14. Sumitani J, Tottori T, Kawaguchi T, Arai M. New type of starch-binding domain: the direct repeat motif in the C-terminal region of Bacillus sp. no. 195 alpha-amylase contributes to starch binding and raw starch degrading. Biochem J 2000;350:477-484.
15. Minassian BA, Ianzano L, Meloche M, Andermann E, Rouleau GA, Delgado-Escueta AV, Scherer, SW. Mutation spectrum and predicted function of laforin in Lafora's progressive myoclonus epilepsy. Neurology 2000;55:341-346.
16. Janecek, S. A motif of a microbial starch-binding domain found in human genethonin. Bioinformatics 2002;18:1534-1537.
17. Lawson CL, van Montfort R, Strokopytov B, Rozeboom HJ, Kalk KH, de Vries GE, Penninga D, Dijkhuizen L, Dijkstra BW. Nucleotide sequence and X-ray structure of cyclodextrin glycosyl-transferase from Bacillus circulans strain 251 in a maltose-dependent crystal form. J Mol Biol 1994;236:590-600.
18. Giardina T, Gunning AP, Juge N, Faulds CB, Furniss CS, Svensson B, Morris VJ, Williamson G. Both binding sites of the starch-binding domain of Aspergillus niger glucoamylase are essential for inducing a conformational change in amylose. J Mol Biol 2001;313:1149-1159.
19. Marchler-Bauer A, Anderson JB, Cherukuri PF, DeWeese-Scott C, Geer LY, Gwadz M, He S, Hurwitz DI, Jackson JD, Ke Z, Lanczycki CJ, Liebert CA, Liu C, Lu F, Marchler GH, Mullokandov M, Shoemaker BA, Simonyan V, Song JS, Thiessen PA, Yamashita RA, Yin JJ, Zhang D, Bryant SH. CDD: a conserved domain database for protein classification. Nucleic Acids Res 2005;33:D192-D196.
20. Bru C, Courcelle E, Carrere S, Beausse Y, Dalmar S, Kahn, D. The ProDom database of protein domain families: more emphasis on 3D. Nucleic Acids Res 2005;33:D212-D215.
21. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 1997;25:3389-2402.
22. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 1994;22:4673-4680.
23. Rost B, Yachdav G, Liu J. The PredictProtein server. Nucleic Acids Res 2004;32:W321-W326.
24. Geourjon C, Deleage G. SOPMA: significant improvements in protein secondary structure prediction by consensus prediction from multiple alignments. Comput Appl Biosci 1995;11:681-684.
25. Wooton J. Non-globular domains in protein sequences: automated segmentation using complexity measures. Comput Chem 1994;18:269-285.
26. Brendel V, Bucher P, Nourbakhsh IR, Blaisdell BE, Karlin S. Methods and algorithms for statistical analysis of protein sequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1992;89:2002-2006.
27. Jones DT, Taylor WR, Thornton JM. The rapid generation of mutation data matrices from protein sequences. Comput Appl Biosci 1992;8:275-282.
28. Pond SL, Frost SD, Muse SV. HyPhy: hypothesis testing using phytogenies. Bioinformatics 2005;21:676-679.
29. Madera M, Vogel C, Kummerfeld SK, Chothia C, Gough J. The SUPERFAMILY database in 2004: additions and improvements. Nucleic Acids Res 2004;32:D235-D239.
30. Kelley LA, MacCallum RM, Sternberg MJ. Enhanced genome annotation using structural profiles in the program 3D-PSSM. J Mol Biol 2000;299:499-520.
31. Shi J, Blundell TL, Mizuguchi K. FUGUE: sequence-structure homology recognition using environment-specific substitution tables and structure-dependent gap penalties. J Mol Biol 2001;310:243-257.
32. Jaroszewski L, Rychlewski L, Li Z, Li W, Godzik A. FFAS03: a server for profile-profile sequence alignments. Nucleic Acids Res 2005;33:W284-W288.
33. Sali A, Blundell TL. Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. J Mol Biol 1993;234:779-815.
34. Douguet D, Labesse G. Easier threading through web-based comparisons and cross-validations. Bioinformatics 2001;17:752-753.
35. Labesse G, Mornon J. Incremental threading optimization (TITO) to help alignment and modelling of remote homologues. Bioinformatics 1998;14:206-211.
36. Sanchez R, Sali A. Large-scale protein structure modeling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998;95:13597-13602.
37. Sippl MJ. Recognition of errors in three-dimensional structures of proteins. Proteins 1993;17:355-362.
38. Zhu ZY, Karlin S. Clusters of charged residues in protein three-dimensional structures. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1996;93:8350-8355.
39. Murzin AG, Brenner SE, Hubbard T, Chothia C. SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. J Mol Biol 1995;247:536-540.
40. Penninga D, van der Veen BA, Knegtel RM, van Hijum SA, Rozeboom HJ, Kalk KH, Dijkstra BW, Dijkhuizen, L. The raw starch binding domain of cyclodextrin glycosyltransferase from Bacillus circulans strain 251. J Biol Chem 1996;271:32777-32784.
41. Williamson MP, Le Gal-Coeffet MF, Sorimachi K, Furniss CS, Archer DB, Williamson G. Function of conserved tryptophans in the Aspergillus niger glucoamylase 1 starch binding domain. Biochemistry 1997;36:7535-7539.
42. Bateman A, Coin L, Durbin R, Finn RD, Hollich V, Griffiths-Jones S, Khanna A, Marshall M, Moxon S, Sonnhammer EL, Studholme DJ, Yeats C, Eddy SR. The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res 2004;32:D138-D141.
43. Ginalski K, Grishin NV, Godzik A, Rychlewski L. Practical lessons from protein structure prediction. Nucleic Acids Res 2005;33:1874-1891.
44. Svensson B, Jespersen H, Sierks MR, MacGregor EA. Sequence homology between putative raw-starch binding domains from different starch-degrading enzymes. Biochem J 1989;264:309-311.