Validation of three oscillometric blood pressure devices against auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in children

Blood Pressure Monitoring

Volumn 11, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 281-291

  Wong, Sik Nin ^a   Tz Sung, Rita Yn ^b   Leung, Lettie Chuk Kwan ^c  

^a TUEN MUN HOSPITAL   (Hong Kong)

^b CHINESE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^c KWONG WAH HOSPITAL   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Blood pressure; Children; Datascope; Dinamap; European Society of Hypertension; International protocol; Oscillometric; Validation study; Welch Allyn

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; AUSCULTATION; BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; CHILD; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIASTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; OSCILLOMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SITTING; SPHYGMOMANOMETRY; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; VALIDATION PROCESS;

ADOLESCENT; BLOOD PRESSURE; BLOOD PRESSURE DETERMINATION; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYPERTENSION; MALE; MERCURY; OSCILLOMETRY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SPHYGMOMANOMETERS;

EID: 33748258876     PISSN: 13595237     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.mbp.0000209082.09623.b4     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation. American national standard. Electronic or automated sphygmomanometers. Arlington, VA: AAMI; 1993.
2. O'Brien E, Petrie J, Littler W, de Swiet M, Padfield PL, Altman DG, et al. The British Hypertension Society protocol for the evaluation of blood pressure measuring devices. J Hypertens 1993; 11:S43-S62.
3. O'Brien E, Pickering T, Asmar R, Myers M, Parati G, Staessen J, et al., on behalf of the European Society of Hypertension. Working group on blood pressure monitoring of the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol for validation of blood pressure measuring devices in adults. Blood Press Monit 2002; 7:3-17.
4. National high blood pressure education program working group on hypertension control in children and adolescents. Update on the 1987 task force report on high blood pressure in children and adolescents: a working group report from the national high blood pressure education program. Pediatrics 1996; 98:649-658.
5. O'Brien E, Waeber B, Parati G, Staessen J, Myers MG, on behalf of the European Society of Hypertension Working Group on Blood Pressure Monitoring. Blood pressure measuring devices: recommendations of the European Society of Hypertension. BMJ 2001; 322:531-536.
6. Jones CR, Taylor K, Poston L, Shennan AH. Validation of the Welch Allyn 'Vital Signs' oscillometric blood pressure monitor. J Hum Hypertens 2001; 15:191-195.
7. Reinders A, Cuckson AC, Jones CR, Poet R, O'Sullivan G, Shennan AH. Validation of the Welch Allyn 'Vital Signs' blood pressure measurement device in pregnancy and pre-eclampsia. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2003; 110:134-138.
8. Park MK, Menard SW, Yuan C. Comparison of auscultatory and oscillometric blood pressure. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2001; 155:50-53.
9. Weaver MG, Park MK, Lee DH. Differences in blood pressure levels obtained by auscultatory and oscillometric methods. Am J Dis Child 1990; 144:911-914.
10. Barker ME, Shiell AW, Law CM. Evaluation of the Dinamap 8100 and Omron M1 blood pressure monitors for use in children. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2000; 14:179-186.
11. Menard SW, Park MK, Yuan CH. The San Antonio Biethnic Children's Blood Pressure Study: auscultatory findings. J Paediatr Child Health 1999; 13:237-244.
12. Mattu GS, Heran BS, Wright JM. Comparison of the automated non-invasive oscillometric blood pressure monitor (BpTRU™) with the auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in a paediatric population. Blood Press Monit 2004; 9:39-45.
13. Anwar YA, Tendler BE, McCabe EJ, Mansoor GA, White WB. Evaluation of the Datascope Accutorr Plus according to the recommendations of the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation. Blood Press Monit 1997; 2:105-110.
14. White WB, Herbst T, Thavarajah S, Giacco S. Clinical evaluation of the Trimline blood pressure cuffs with the Accutorr PlusTM monitor. Blood Press Monit 2003; 8:137-140.
15. Beaubien ER, Card CM, Card SE, Biem HJ, Wilson TW. Accuracy of the Dinamap 1846 XT automated blood pressure monitor. J Hum Hypertens 2002; 16:647-652.
16. Kuo CS, Hwu CM, Kwok CF, Hsiao LC, Weih MJ, Lee SH, et al. Using semi-automated oscillometric blood pressure measurement in diabetic patients and their offspring. J Diabetes Complications 2000; 14:288-293.
17. National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group on High Blood Pressure in Children and Adolescents. The fourth report on the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure in children and adolescents. Pediatrics 2004; 114:555-576.
18. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; i:307-310.
19. O'Brien E. Validation up-date. Blood Press Monit 2001; 6:275-280.
20. Sun M, Jones R. Accuracy relationship of blood pressure devices between the AAMI SP 10 Standard and the British Hypertension Society Protocols. Biomed Instrum Technol 1999; 33:62-70.