Accuracy relationship of blood pressure devices between the AAMISP 10 standard and the british hypertension society protocols

Biomedical Instrumentation and Technology

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 62-70

  Sun, Mark ^a,b   Jones, Roger ^a,b  

^a NeoPath Inc   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF UTAH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BLOOD; PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; STANDARDS; STATISTICAL METHODS;

BLOOD PRESSURE DEVICES;

BIOMEDICAL EQUIPMENT;

AMBULATORY MONITORING; ARTICLE; BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; MEDICAL INSTRUMENTATION; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; PATIENT MONITORING;

EID: 0033049685     PISSN: 08998205     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Ventura S, Peters K, Martin J, et al. Births and Deaths: United States, 1996. Monthly Vital Statistics Report. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Center for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics. 1997;46:1-40, Suppl. 2.
2. American National Standard for Electronic or Automated Sphygmomanometers: ANSI/AAMI SP10-1987. Arlington, VA: Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation. 1987.
3. American National Standard for Electronic or Automated Sphygmomanometers: ANSI/AAMI SP10-1992. Arlington, VA: Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation. 1992.
4. Amendment to ANSI/AAMI SP10-1992: American National Standard for Electronic or Automated Sphygmomanometers: ANSI/AAMI SP10A-1996. Arlington, VA: Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation. 1996.
5. O'Brien E, Pétrie J, Littler W, et al. The British Hypertension Society protocol for the evaluation of automated and semiautomated blood pressure measuring devices with special reference to ambulatory systems. J Hypertens. 1990;8:607-19.
6. O'Brien E, Pétrie J, Littler W, et al. The British Hypertension Society protocol for the evaluation of blood pressure measuring devices. J Hypertens. 1993;11 (suppl 2); S43-S62.
7. O'Brien E, Mee F, Atkins N, O'Malley K The quest for better validation: a critical comparison of the AAMI and BHS validation protocols for ambulatory blood pressure measurement systems. Biomed InstrumTechnol. 1992;26:395-9.
8. O'Brien E, Atkins N, Mee F, O'Malley K Evaluation of blood pressure measuring devices. Clin Exp Hypertens. 1993;15: 1087-97.
9. O'Brien E, Atkins N. A comparison of the British Hypertension Society and Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation protocols for validating blood pressure measuring devices: can the two be reconciled? J Hypertens. 1994;12:1089-94.
10. O'Brien E, Mee F, Atkins N, O'Malley K. Accuracy of the Takeda TM-2420/TM-2020 determined by the British Hypertension Society Protocol. J Hypertens. 1991;9:571-2.
11. Palatini P, Penzo M, Canali C, Pessina C. Validation of the A&D TM-2420 Model 7 for ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and effect of microphone replacement on its performance. J Ambulatory Monit. 1991;4:281-8.
12. Imai Y, Sasaki S, Minami N, et al. The accuracy and performance of the A&D TM 2421, a new ambulatory blood pressure monitoring device based on the cuff-oscillometric method and the Korotkoff sound technique. Am J Hypertens. 1992;5:719-26.
13. Ling J, Ohara Y, Orime Y, et al. Clinical evaluation of the oscillometric blood pressure monitor in adults and children based on the 1992 AAMI SP-10 standards. J Clin Monit. 1995;11:123-30.
14. O'Brien E, Mee F, Atkins N, O'Malley K. Short report: Accuracy of the Dinamap portable monitor: model 8100 determined by the British Hypertension Society Protocol. J Hypertens. 1993;ll:761-3.
15. O'Brien E, Mee F, Atkins N, O'Malley K. Accuracy of the Del Mar Avionics Pressurometer IV determined by the British Hypertension Society Protocol. J Hypertens. 1991;9: 567-8.
16. O'Brien E, Mee F, Atkins N, O'Malley K Short report: Accuracy of the CH-Druck/Pressure Scan ERKA ambulatory blood pressure measuring system determined by the British Hypertension Society Protocol. J Hypertens. 1992; 10:1283-4.
17. O'Brien E, Mee F, Atkins N, O'Malley K. Accuracy of the Novacor DIASYS 200 determined by the British Hypertension Society Protocol. J Hypertens. 1991;9:569-70.
18. O'Brien E, Mee F, Atkins N, O'Malley K. Accuracy of the Profilomat determined by the British Hypertension Society Protocol [short report]. J Hypertens. 1992;10:1285-6.
19. Livi R, Teghini L, Cagnoni S, Scarpelli FT. Simultaneous and sequential same-arm measurements in the validation studies of automated blood pressure measuring devices. Am J Hypertens. 1996;9:1228-31.
20. Mee F, Atkins N, O'Brien E. Validation of the Nissei DS-240 ambulatory blood pressure measuring system as determined by the British Hypertension Society protocol (abstr). J Hum Hypertens. 1994;8:295.
21. Gupta M, Shennan AH, Halligan A, Taylor DJ, de Swiet M. Accuracy of oscillometric blood pressure monitoring in pregnancy and pre-eclampsia. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997 Mar;104(3):350-5.
22. Foster C, McKinlay S, Cruickshank JM, Coats AJ. Accuracy of the Omron HEM 706 portable monitor for home measurement of blood pressure. J Hum Hypertens. 1994;8:661-4.
23. O'Brien E, Mee F, Atkins N, O'Malley K. Evaluation of the SpaceLabs 90202 non-invasive ambulatory recorder according to the AAMI Standard and BHS criteria. J Hum Hypertens. 1991;5:223-6.
24. O'Brien E, Mee F, Atkins N, O'Malley K. Accuracy of the SpaceLabs 90207 determined by the British Hypertension Society Protocol, [short report]. J Hypertens. 1991;9:573-4.
25. Mayoral Sanchez E, Diez Naz AD, Lapetra Peralta J, et al. [An evaluation of the Spacelabs 90207 model of the ambulatory arterial pressure monitoring system].[Article in Spanish]. Med Clin (Bare). 1994;103:326-0.
26. O'Brien E, Mee F, Atkins N, Halligan A, O'Malley K. Accuracy of the SpaceLabs 90207 ambulatory blood pressure measuring system in normotensive pregnant women determined by the British Hypertension Society protocol. J Hypertens. 1993; 11 suppl 5:S282-3.
27. Shennan AH, Kissane J, de Swiet M. Validation of the SpaceLabs 90207 ambulatory blood pressure monitor for use in pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1993; 100:904-8.
28. Sun M, Tien J, Jones R, Ward R. A new approach to reproducibility assessment: clinical evaluation of SpaceLabs Medical oscillometric blood pressure monitor. Biomed InstrumTechnol. 1996;30:439-48.
29. Taylor R, Chidley K, Goodwin J, et al. Accutracker II (version 30/23) ambulatory blood pressure monitor: clinical validation using the British Hypertension Society and Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation standards. / Hypertens. 1993;! 1:1275-82.
30. Imai Y, Hashimoto J, Minami N, et al. Accuracy and performance of the Terumo ES-H51: a new portable blood pressure monitor. Am J Hypertens. 1994;7:255-60.
31. O'Shea JC, Murphy MB. Factors confounding assessment of ambulatory blood pressure monitors, studied during formal evaluation of the Tycos Quiet-Trak. Am J Hypertens. 1997;10:175-80.
32. White WB, Susser W, James GD, et al. Multicenter assessment of the QuietTrak ambulatory blood pressure recorder according to the 1992 AAMI guidelines. Am J Hypertens. 1994;7:509-14.
33. Woolson RF. Statistical Methods for the Analysis of Biomédical Data. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1987, pp 230-3.
34. Schwan A, Jonsson D. Short-term variation in blood pressure determines the accuracy of simultaneous and sequential recordings in the validation of blood pressure measuring devices. J Hum Hypertens. 1993;7:315-19.
35. Coats J, Clark S. British Hypertension Protocol Getter). J Hypertens. 1991;9:575-576.