Institutional and stakeholder mapping: Frameworks for policy analysis and institutional change

Public Organization Review

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 79-90

  Aligica, Paul Dragos ^a  

^a GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Institutional analysis; Policy analysis; Public policy design; Stakeholder mapping

Indexed keywords

EID: 33748190186     PISSN: 15667170     EISSN: 15737098     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11115-006-6833-0     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Abbott A (1997) Of time and space: The contemporary relevance of the chicago school. Soc Forces 75(4):1149-1182
2. Abbott A (1999) Department and discipline: Chicago sociology at 100. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
3. Azevedo J (1997) Mapping reality: An evolutionary realist methodology for the natural and social science. SUNY Series in the Philosophy of the Social Science, New York.
4. Boettke P (2003) The new political economy. Mercatus Center Working Papers. George Mason University, Fairfax
5. Bulmer M (1984) The Chicago School of Sociology: Institutionalisation, diversity, and the rise of sociological research. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
6. Brugha R, Varvasovszky Z (2000) Stakeholder analysis: A review. Health Policy Plan 15(3):239-246
7. Faris R (1967) Chicago sociology, 1920-1939. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
8. Gordon S (1991) The history and philosophy of social science. Routledge, New York
9. McGinnis M (2000) Polycentric games and institutions: Readings from the workshop in political theory and policy analysis. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor
10. Macpherson I, Brooker R, Ainsworth P (2000) Case study in the contemporary world of research: Using notions of purpose, place, process and product to develop some principles for practice. Int J Soc Res Methodol 3(1):49-61
11. Monmonier M (1993) Mapping it out: Expository cartography for the humanities and social sciences. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
12. Morgan P, Taschereau S (1996, June) Capacity and institutional assessment: Frameworks, methods and tools for analysis. Prepared for CIDA Policy Branch
13. Ostrom E (1986) An agenda for the study of institutions. Public Choice 48:3-25
14. Ostrom E (1990) Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, New York
15. Ostrom E, Kiser L (1982) The three worlds of action. A meta-theoretical synthesis of institutional approaches. In Ostrom E. (ed) Strategies of Political Inquiry. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills pp. 34-35
16. Ostrom E, Crawford S (1995) A grammar of institutions. Am Polit Sci Rev 89(3):582-600
17. Ostrom E, Gardner R, Walker J (1994) Rules, games, and common-pool resources. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor
18. Rubinstein RA, Laughlin CD, McManus J (1984) Science as a cognition process. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia
19. Turnbull D (1989) Maps are territories: Science is an atlas. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago