Proximity-dependent pollen performance in Silene vulgaris

Annals of Botany

Volumn 98, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 431-437

  Glaettli, Mélanie ^a   Pescatore, Luca ^b   Goudet, Jérôme ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LAUSANNE   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Gynodioecy; Microsatellites; Pollen performance; Population structure; Silene vulgaris

Indexed keywords

MICROSATELLITE DNA;

GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC STRUCTURE; GYNODIOECY; HERB; INBREEDING; PLANT-INSECT INTERACTION; POLLEN; POLLINATION; POPULATION STRUCTURE; SEED DISPERSAL;

ARTICLE; BREEDING; GENETIC MARKER; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; PHYSIOLOGY; POLLEN; REPRODUCTION; SILENE;

BREEDING; GENETIC MARKERS; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; POLLEN; REPRODUCTION; SILENE;

CENTRAL EUROPE; EURASIA; EUROPE; SWITZERLAND;

ANIMALIA; INSECTA; SILENE; SILENE VULGARIS; HEXAPODA;

EID: 33748179339     PISSN: 03057364     EISSN: 10958290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcl119     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Aizen MA, Searcy KB, Mulcahy DL. 1990. Among-flower and within-flower comparisons of pollen-tube growth following self-pollinations and cross-pollinations in Dianthus chinensis (Caryophyllaceae). American Journal of Botany 77: 671-676.
2. Aronen T, Nikkanen T, Harju A, Tiimonen H, Häggman H. 2002. Pollen competition and seed-siring success in Picea abies. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 104: 638-642.
3. Bailey MF, McCauley DE. 2005. Offspring sex ratio under inbreeding and outbreeding in a gynodioecious plant. Evolution 59: 287-295.
4. Charlesworth D, Laporte V. 1998. The male-sterility polymorphism of Silene vulgaris: analysis of genetic data from two populations and comparison with Thymus vulgaris. Genetics 150: 1267-1282.
5. Couvet D, Atlan A, Belhassen E, Gliddon C, Gouyon PH, Kjellberg F. 1990. Co-evolution between two symbionts: the case of cytoplasmic male-sterility in higher plants. In: Futuyama D, Antonovics J, eds. Oxford surveys in evolutionary biology, Vol. 7. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 225-247.
6. Cruzan MB. 1990. Pollen-pollen and pollen-style interactions during pollen-tube growth in Erythronium grandiflorum (Liliaceae). American Journal of Botany 77: 116-122.
7. Cruzan MB, Barrett SCH. 1996. Postpollination mechanisms influencing mating patterns and fecundity: an example from Eichhornia paniculata. American Naturalist 147: 576-598.
8. Delph LF. 1990. Sex-ratio variation in the gynodioecious shrub Hebe strictissima (Scrophulariaceae). Evolution 44: 134-142.
9. Delph LF. 2004. Testing for sex differences in biparental inbreeding and its consequences in a gynodioecious species. American Journal of Botany 91: 45-51.
10. Dulberg R, Horovitz A. 1984. Gender polymorphism in flowers of Silene vulgaris (Moench) Garke (Caryophyllaceae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 89: 101-117.
11. Emery SN, McCauley DE. 2002. Consequences of inbreeding for offspring fitness and gender in Silene vulgaris, a gynodioecious plant. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 15: 1057-1066.
12. Frank S. 1989. The evolutionary dynamics of cytoplasmic male sterility. American Naturalist 133: 345-376.
13. Gigord LBD, Lavignes C, Shykoff JA, Atlan A. 1998. No evidence for local adaption between cytoplasmic male sterility and nuclear restorer genes in the gynodioecious species Thymus vulgaris L. Heredity 81: 156-163.
14. Glaettli M. 2004. Mechanisms involved in the maintenance of inbreeding depression in gynodioecious Silene vulgaris (Caryophyllaceae): an experimental investigation. PhD Thesis, University of Lausanne, Switzerland.
15. Goudet J. 1995. FSTAT (Version 1.2): a computer program to calculate F-statistics. Journal of Heredity 86: 485-486.
16. Herrero M, Hormaza JI. 1996. Pistil strategies controlling pollen-tube growth. Sexual Plant Reproduction 9: 343-347.
17. Hormaza JI, Herrero M. 1996. Dynamics of pollen-tube growth under different competition regimes. Sexual Plant Reproduction 9: 153-160.
18. Ingvarsson PK. 2001. Restoration of genetic variation lost - the genetic rescue hypothesis. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16: 62-63.
19. Jolls CL, Chenier TC. 1989. Gynodioecy in Silene vulgaris (Caryophyllaceae): progeny success, experimental design and maternal effects. American Journal of Botany 76: 1360-1367.
20. Juillet N, Freymond H, Degen L, Goudet J. 2003. Isolation and characterization of highly polymorphic microsatellite loci in the bladder campion, Silene vulgaris (Caryophyllaceae). Molecular Ecology Notes 3: 358-359.
21. Koelewijn HP. 2004. Sibling competition, size variation and frequency-dependent outcrossing advantage in Plantago coronopus. Evolutionary Ecology 18: 51-74.
22. Kohn JR, Biardi JE. 1995. Outcrossing rates and inferred levels of inbreeding depression in gynodioecious Cucurbita foetidissima (Cucurbitaceae). Heredity 75: 77-83.
23. Laporte V, Viard F, Bena G, Valero M, Cuguen J. 2001. The spatial structure of sexual and cytonuclear polymorphism in the gynodioecious Beta vulgaris ssp. maritima: I. At a local scale. Genetics 157: 1699-1710.
24. Levin DA. 1984. Inbreeding depression and proximity-dependent crossing success in Phlox drummondii. Evolution 38:116-127.
25. Levin DA. 1989. Proximity-dependent cross compatibility in Phlox. Evolution 43: 1114-1116.
26. Madsen T. 1999. Conservation biology - restoration of an inbred adder population. Nature 402: 34-35.
27. McCauley DE. 1998. The genetic structure of a gynodioecious plant: nuclear and cytoplasmic genes. Evolution 52: 255-260.
28. McCauley DE, Brock MT. 1998. Frequency-dependent fitness in Silene vulgaris, a gynodioecious plant. Evolution 52: 30-36.
29. McCauley DE, Olson MS, Emery SN, Taylor DR. 2000. Population structure influences sex ratio evolution in a gynodioecious plant. American Naturalist 155: 814-819.
30. Melser C, Rademaker MCJ, Klinkhamer PGL. 1997. Selection on pollen donors by Echium vulgare (Boraginaceae). Sexual Plant Reproduction 10: 305-312.
31. Mulcahy DL. 1979. The rise of angiosperms: a genecological factor. Science 206: 20-23.
32. Mutikainen P, Delph LF. 1998. Inbreeding depression in gynodioecious Lobelia siphilitica: among-family differences override between-morph differences. Evolution 52: 1572-1582.
33. Pasonen HL, Pulkkinen O, Kapyla M, Blom A. 1999. Pollen-tube growth rate and seed-siring success among Betula pendula clones. New Phytologist 143: 243-251.
34. Pettersson MW. 1991. Pollination by a guild of fluctuating moth populations: option for unspecialization in Silene vulgaris. Journal of Ecology 79: 591-604.
35. Pettersson MW. 1992. Advantages of being a specialist female in gynodioecious Silene vulgaris (Caryophyllaceae). American Journal of Botany 79: 1389-1395.
36. Queller DC, Goodnight KF. 1989. Estimating relatedness using genetic markers. Evolution 43: 258-275.
37. R Development Core Team. 2005. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria http://www.R-project.org.
38. Robertson IC, Ulappa AC. 2004. Distance between pollen donor and recipient influences fruiting success in slickspot peppergrass, Lepidium papilliferum. Canadian Journal of Botany 82: 1705-1710.
39. Sakai AK, Weller SG, Chen M-L, Chou S-Y, Tasanont C. 1997. Evolution of gynodioecy and maintenance of females: the role of inbreeding depression, outcrossing rates and resource allocation in Schiedea adamantis (Caryophyllaceae). Evolution 51: 724-736.
40. Saumitou-Laprade P, Cuguen J, Vernet P. 1994. Cytoplasmic malesterility in plants - molecular evidence and the nucleocytoplasmic conflict. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 9: 431-435.
41. Schemske DW, Pautler LP. 1984. The effect of pollen composition on fitness components in a neotropical herb. Oecologia 62: 31-36.
42. Shykoff JA. 1988. Maintenance of gynodioecy in Silene acaulis (Caryophyllaceae): stage-specific fecundity and viability selection. American Journal of Botany 75: 844-850.
43. Snow AA, Spira TP. 1991a. Differential pollen-tube growth rates and non-random fertilization in Hibiscus moscheutos (Malvaceae). American Journal of Botany 78: 1419-1426.
44. Snow AA, Spira TP. 1991b. Pollen vigor and the potential for sexual selection in plants. Nature 352: 796-797.
45. Souto CP, Aizen MA, Premoli AC. 2002. Effects of crossing distance and genetic relatedness on pollen performance in Alstroemeria aurea (Alstroemeriaceae). American Journal of Botany 89: 427-432.
46. Taylor DR, Trimble S, McCauley DE. 1999. Ecological genetics of gynodioecy in Silene vulgaris: relative fitness of females and hermaphrodites during the colonization process. Evolution 53: 745-751.
47. Thompson J, Tarayre M. 2000. Exploring the genetic basis and proximate causes of female fertility advantage in gynodioecious Thymus vulgaris. Evolution 54: 1510-1520.
48. Waser NM, Price MV. 1983. Optimal and actual outcrossing in plants, and the nature of plant-pollinator interaction. In: Jones CE, Little RJ, eds. Handbook of experimental pollination biology. Scientific Academic Editions, New York, 341-259.
49. Waser NM, Price MV. 1991. Outcrossing distance effects in Delphinium nelsonii: pollen loads, pollen-tubes and seed set. Ecology 72: 171-179.
50. Waser NM, Price MV. 1993. Crossing distance effects on prezygotic performance in plants: an argument for female choice. Oikos 68: 303-308.
51. Weir BS, Cockerham CC. 1984. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population-structure. Evolution 38: 1358-1370.
52. Weller SG, Ornduff R. 1989. Incompatibility in Amsinckia grandiflora (Boraginaceae) - distribution of callose plugs and pollen-tubes following intermorph and intramorph crosses. American Journal of Botany 76: 277-282.