The mechanism of class II correction in surgical orthodontic treatment of adult class II, division 1 malocclusions

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 74, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 800-809

  Pancherz, Hans ^a   Ruf, Sabine ^b   Erbe, Christina ^a   Hansen, Ken ^c  

^a JUSTUS LIEBIG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Facial profile; Orthodontics; Sagittal mandibular split osteotomy; Treatment effects

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FACE PROFILE; FEMALE; FILM; HEIGHT; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; JAW; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; MANDIBLE; MOLAR TOOTH; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; ORTHODONTICS; OSTEOTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PROGNATHIA; RADIOGRAPHY; SKELETON; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOOTH; TOOTH EXTRACTION;

EID: 12444297524     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Proffit WR, White RP, Sarver DMD. Contemporary Treatment of Dentofacial Deformity. St. Louis, Mo: Mosby; 2003:312-344.
2. Hoffmann-Axthelm W. Chirurgie der Zahnstellung und Kieferanormalien. Die Geschichte der Mund-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie. Berlin: Quintessence; 1995:121-142.
3. Obwegeser H. The surgical correction of mandibular prognathism and retrognathia with consideration of genioplasty. Oral Surg. 1957;10:677-689.
4. Dal Pont G. Retromolar osteotomy for the correction of prognathism. J Oral Surg. 1961;19:42-47.
5. Hunsuck EE. A modified intraoral sagittal splitting technique for correction of mandibular prognathism. J Oral Surg. 1968;26:250-253.
6. Epker BN. Modifications in the sagittal osteotomy of the mandible. J Oral Surg. 1977;35:157-159.
7. Proffit WR, Phillips C, Douvartzidis N. A comparison of outcomes of orthodontic and surgical-orthodontic treatment of Class II malocclusion in adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1992; 101:556-565.
8. Schubert P, Bailey LTJ, White RP, Proffit WR. Long-term cephalometric changes in untreated adults compared to those treated with orthognathic surgery. J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg. 1999;14:91-99.
9. Mihalik CA, Proffit WR, Phillips C. Long-term follow-up of Class II adults treated with orthodontic camouflage: a comparison with orthognathic surgery outcome. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;123:266-278.
10. Lawrence TN, Ellis E, McNamara JA Jr. The frequency and distribution pf skeletal and dental components in Class II surgery patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1985;43:24-34.
11. Schendel SA, Epker N. Results after mandibular advancement surgery and analysis of 87 cases. J Oral Surg. 1980;38:255-282.
12. Freihofer HP, Petresevic D. Late results after advancing the mandible by sagittal splitting of the rami. J Maxillofac Surg. 1975;3: 250-257.
13. Hägg U, Taranger J. Skeletal stages of the hand and wrist as indicators of the pubertal growth spurt. Acta Odontol Scand. 1980;38:187-200.
14. Pancherz H. The mechanism of Class II correction in Herbst appliance treatment. Am J Orthod. 1982;82:104-113.
15. Ricketts RM. Esthetics, environment, and the law of lip relation. Am J Orthod. 1968;54:272-289.
16. Wilmot JJ. Barber HD, Chou DG, Vig KWL. Associations between severity of dentofacial deformity and motivation for orthodontic-orthognathic surgery treatment. Angle Orthod. 1993;63: 283-288.
17. Flanery CM, Barnwell GM, Alexander JM. Patients perceptions of orthognathic surgery. Am J Orthod. 1985;88:137-145.
18. Mayo KH, Dryland-Vig KWL, Vig PS, Kowalski CJ. Attitude variables of dentofacial deformity patients: demographic characteristics and associations. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1991;49:594-602.
19. Kiyak HA, McNeill RW, West RA, Hohl T. Personality characteristics as predictors and sequale of surgical and conventional orthodontics. Am J Orthod. 1986;89:383-392.
20. Bell R, Kiyak HA, Joondeph DR, McNeill RW, Wallen TR. Perceptions of facial profile and their influence on the decision to undergo orthognathic surgery. Am J Orthod. 1985;88:323-332.
21. Gerzanic L, Jagsch R, Watzke IM. Psychologic implications of orthognathic surgery in patients with skeletal Class II or Class III malocclusion. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg. 2002;17:75-81.
22. Cassidy DW, Herbosa EG, Rotskoff KS, Johnston LE. A comparison of surgery and orthodontics in "borderline" adults with Class II, division 1 malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993;104:455-470.
23. Hoppenreijs TJ, Hakman EC, van't Hof MA, Stoelinga PJ, Tuinzing DB, Freihofer HP. Psychologic implications of surgical orthodontic treatment in patients with anterior open bite. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg. 1999;14:101-112.
24. Bhatia SN, Leighton BC. A Manual of Facial Growth. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 1993.
25. Kohn MW. Analysis of relapse after mandibular advancement surgery. J Oral Surg. 1978;9:676-684.
26. La Blanc JP, Turvey T, Epker BN, Hill C. Results following simultaneous mobilization of the maxilla and mandible for the correction of dentofacial deformities. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1982;54:607-612.
27. Turvey T, Phillips C, Laytown HS, Proffit WR. Simultaneous superior repositioning of the maxilla and mandibular advancement. A report on stability. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1988;94: 372-383.
28. Epker BN, Wessberg G. Mechanisms of early skeletal relapse following surgical advancement of the mandible. Br J Oral Surg. 1982;20:175-182.
29. Schellhas KP, Piper MA, Bessette RW, Wilkes CH. Mandibular retrusion, temporomandibular joint derangement, and orthognathic surgery planning. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;90:218-229.
30. Pancherz H, Anehus-Pancherz M. Facial profile changes during and after Herbst appliance treatment. Eur J Orthod. 1994;16:275-286.
31. Proffit WR, Turvey TA, Philips C. Orthognathic surgery: a hierarchy of stability. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg. 1996;11: 191-204.
32. Weaver N, Glover K, Major P, Varnhagen C, Grace M. Age limitation on provision of orthopedic therapy and orthognathic surgery. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;113:156-164.
33. Ruf S, Pancherz H. Kiefergelenkswachstumsadaptation bei jungen Erwachsenen während Behandlung mit der Herbst Apparatur. Eine prospektive magnetresonanztomographische und kephalometrische Studie. Inf Orthod Kieferorthop 1998;30:735-750.
34. Ruf S, Pancherz H. Dentoskeletal effects and facial profile changes in young adults treated with the Herbst appliance. Angle Orthod. 1999;69:239-246.
35. Ruf S, Pancherz H. Temporomandibular joint remodeling in adolescents and young adults during Herbst treatment: a prospective longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging and cephalometric radiographic investigation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999; 115:607-618.
36. Ruf S, Pancherz H. When is the ideal period for Herbst therapy - early or late? Semin Orthod 2003;9:47-56.
37. Pancherz H. Dentofacial orthopedics or orthognathic surgery: is it a matter of age? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000;117: 571-574.
38. Pancherz H, Ruf S. The Herbst appliance - research based updated clinical possibilities. World J Orthod. 2000;1:17-31.
39. Broadbent TR, Woolf RM. Our experience with the sagittal split osteotomie for retrognathia. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1977;66:860-867.
40. Heydarian F, Perko M. Resultate beim Vorbringen des Unterkiefers durch sagittale Spaltung des Ramus. Fortschr Kiefer Gesichtschir. 1981;26:44-46.
41. Paulus GW, Steinhäuser EW. A comparative study of wire osteosynthesis versus bone screws in the treatment of mandibular prognathism. J Oral Surg. 1982;54:2-6.