Does motor lateralization have implications for stroke rehabilitation?

Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development

Volumn 43, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 311-322

  Sainburg, Robert L ^a   Duff, Susan V ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Coordination; Dynamic dominance; Handedness; Hemiplegia; Ipsilesional deficits; Lateralization; Motor control; Motor learning; Rehabilitation; Stroke

Indexed keywords

CONTROLLABILITY; HUMAN REHABILITATION ENGINEERING; NEUROMUSCULAR REHABILITATION; PATIENT MONITORING; PATIENT REHABILITATION;

DYNAMIC DOMINANCE; HEMIPLEGIA; IPSILESIONAL DEFICITS; MOTOR CONTROL; MOTOR LEARNING; STROKE;

NEUROLOGY;

HEMIPLEGIA; HUMAN; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; STROKE; STROKE PATIENT;

CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MOVEMENT DISORDERS;

EID: 33747835230     PISSN: 07487711     EISSN: 07487711     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1682/JRRD.2005.01.0013     Document Type: Review

References (119)

1. Sainburg RL. Evidence for a dynamic-dominance hypothesis of handedness. Exp Brain Res. 2003;142(2):241-58.
2. Healey JM, Liederman J, Geschwind N. Handedness is not a unidimensional trait. Cortex. 1986;22(1):33-53.
3. Carey JR, Baxter TL, Di Fabio RP. Tracking control in the nonparetic hand of subjects with stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79(4):435-41.
4. Desrosiers J, Bourbonnais D, Bravo G, Roy PM, Guay M. Performance of the 'unaffected' upper extremity of elderly stroke patients. Stroke. 1996;27(9):1564-70.
5. Haaland KY, Cleeland CS, Carr D. Motor performance after unilateral hemisphere damage in patients with tumor. Arch Neurol. 1977;34(9):556-59.
6. Haaland KY, Delaney HD. Motor deficits after left or right hemisphere damage due to stroke or tumor. Neuropsychologia. 1981;19(1):17-27.
7. Haaland KY, Harrington D. The role of the hemispheres in closed loop movements. Brain Cogn. 1989;9(2):158-80.
8. Haaland KY, Harrington DL. Hemispheric asymmetry of movement. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1996;6(6):796-800.
9. Haaland KY, Harrington DL. Hemispheric control of the initial and corrective components of aiming movements. Neuropsychologia. 1989;27(7):961-69.
10. Haaland KY, Prestopnik JL, Knight RT, Lee RR. Hemispheric asymmetries for kinematic and positional aspects of reaching. Brain. 2004;127(Pt 5):1145-58.
11. Harrington DL, Haaland KY. Hemispheric specialization for motor sequencing: Abnormalities in levels of programming. Neuropsychologia. 1991;29(2):147-63.
12. Schaefer SY, Sainburg RL, Haaland KY. Differential hemispheric contributions to unilateral arm movements [abstract]. Soc Neurosci. 2005;Program number 181.4.
13. Sunderland A. Recovery of ipsilateral dexterity after stroke. Stroke. 2000;31(2):430-33.
14. Wetter S, Poole JL, Haaland KY. Functional implications of ipsilesional motor deficits after unilateral stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86(4):776-81.
15. Winstein CJ, Pohl PS. Effects of unilateral brain damage on the control of goal-directed hand movements. Exp Brain Res. 1995;105(1):163-74.
16. Wyke M. Effect of brain lesions on the rapidity of arm movement. Neurology. 1967;17(11):1113-20.
17. Yarosh CA, Hoffman DS, Strick PL. Deficits in movements of the wrist ipsilateral to a stroke in hemiparetic subjects. J Neurophysiol. 2004;92(6):3276-85.
18. Gonzalez CL, Gharbawie OA, Williams PT, Kleim JA, Kolb B, Whishaw IQ. Evidence for bilateral control of skilled movements: Ipsilateral skilled forelimb reaching deficits and functional recovery in rats follow motor cortex and lateral frontal cortex lesions. Eur J Neurosci. 2004;20(12):3442-52.
19. Grabowski M, Brundin P, Johansson BB. Paw-reaching, sensorimotor, and rotational behavior after brain infarction in rats. Stroke. 1993;24(6):889-95.
20. Vergara-Aragon P, Gonzalez CL, Whishaw IQ. A novel skilled-reaching impairment in paw supination on the "good" side of the hemi-Parkinson rat improved with rehabilitation. J Neurosci. 2003;23(2):579-86.
21. Rapin I, Tourk LM, Costa LD. Evaluation of the Purdue Pegboard as a screening test for brain damage. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1966;8(1):45-54.
22. Jebsen RH, Taylor N, Trieschmann RB, Trotter MJ, Howard LA. An objective and standardized test of hand function. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1969;50(6):311-19.
23. Hidler J, Nichols D, Pelliccio M, Brady K. Advances in the understanding and treatment of stroke impairment using robotic devices. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2005;12(2):22-35.
24. Volpe BT, Ferraro M, Krebs HI, Hogan N. Robotics in the rehabilitation treatment of patients with stroke. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2002;4(4):270-76.
25. Volpe BT, Ferraro M, Lynch D, Christos P, Krol J, Trudell C, Krebs HI, Hogan N. Robotics and other devices in the treatment of patients recovering from stroke. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2004;6(4):314-19.
26. Volpe BT, Krebs HI, Hogan N. Robot-aided sensorimotor training in stroke rehabilitation. Adv Neurol. 2003;92:429-33.
27. Bonifer NM, Anderson KM, Arciniegas DB. Constraint-induced movement therapy after stroke: Efficacy for patients with minimal upper-extremity motor ability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86(9):1867-73.
28. Bonifer NM, Anderson KM, Arciniegas DB. Constraint-induced therapy for moderate chronic upper extremity impairment after stroke. Brain Inj. 2005;19(5):323-30.
29. Mark VW, Taub E. Constraint-induced movement therapy for chronic stroke hemiparesis and other disabilities. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2004;22(3-5):317-36.
30. Wolf SL, Thompson PA, Morris DM, Rose DK, Winstein CJ, Taub E, Giuliani C, Pearson SL. The EXCITE trial: Attributes of the Wolf Motor Function Test in patients with subacute stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2005;19(3):194-205.
31. Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, Van der Grond J, Prevo AJ. Probability of regaining dexterity in the flaccid upper limb: Impact of severity of paresis and time since onset in acute stroke. Stroke. 2003;34(9):2181-86.
32. Parry RH, Lincoln NB, Vass CD. Effect of severity of arm impairment on response to additional physiotherapy early after stroke. Clin Rehabil. 1999;13(3):187-98.
33. Vega-Gonzalez A, Granat MH. Continuous monitoring of upper-limb activity in a free-living environment. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86(3):541-48.
34. Wade DT, Langton-Hewer R, Wood VA, Skilbeck CE, Ismail HM. The hemiplegic arm after stroke: Measurement and recovery. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1983;46(6):521-24.
35. Sullivan JW, Ryan PA. Activities of daily living adaptations: Managing the environment with one-handed techniques. In: Gillen G, Burkhardt A, editors. Stroke rehabilitation: A function-based approach. St. Louis (MO): Mosby; 2005. p. 479-95.
36. Holstege G, Kuypers HG. The anatomy of brain stem pathways to the spinal cord in cat. A labeled amino acid tracing study. Prog Brain Res. 1982;57:145-75.
37. Holstege JC, Kuypers HG. Brainstem projections to lumbar motoneurons in rat - I. An ultrastructural study using autoradiography and the combination of autoradiography and horseradish peroxidase histochemistry. Neuroscience. 1987;21(2):345-67.
38. Kuypers HG. A new look at the organization of the motor system. Prog Brain Res. 1982;57:381-403.
39. Kuypers HG, Brinkman J. Precentral projections to different parts of the spinal intermediate zone in the rhesus monkey. Brain Res. 1970;24(1):29-48.
40. Kuypers HG, Laurence DG. Cortical projections to the red nucleus and the brain stem in the rhesus monkey. Brain Res. 1967;4(2):151-88.
41. Kuypers HG, Fleming WR, Farinholt JW. Subcorticospinal projections in the rhesus monkey. J Comp Neurol. 1962;118:107-37.
42. Kuypers HG, Maisky VA. Retrograde axonal transport of horseradish peroxidase from spinal cord to brain stem cell groups in the cat. Neurosci Lett. 1975;1:9-14.
43. Lawrence DG, Kuypers HG. The functional organization of the motor system in the monkey. I. The effects of bilateral pyramidal lesions. Brain. 1968;91(1):1-14.
44. Lawrence DG, Kuypers HG. The functional organization of the motor system in the monkey. II. The effects of lesions of the descending brain-stem pathways. Brain. 1968;91(1):15-36.
45. Chen R, Cohen LG, Hallett M. Role of the ipsilateral motor cortex in voluntary movement. Can J Neurol Sci. 1997;24(4):284-91.
46. Chen R, Gerloff C, Hallett M, Cohen LG. Involvement of the ipsilateral motor cortex in finger movements of different complexities. Ann Neurol. 1997;41(2):247-54.
47. Dassonville P, Zhu XH, Uurbil K, Kim SG, Ashe J. Functional activation in motor cortex reflects the direction and the degree of handedness. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997;94(25):14015-18. Erratum in: Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95(19):11499.
48. Gitelman DR, Alpert NM, Kosslyn S, Daffner K, Scinto L, Thompson W, Mesulam MM. Functional imaging of human right hemispheric activation for exploratory movements. Ann Neurol. 1996;39(2):174-79.
49. Kawashima R, Inoue K, Sato K, Fukuda H. Functional asymmetry of cortical motor control in left-handed subjects. Neuroreport. 1997;8(7):1729-32.
50. Kawashima R, Itoh H, Ono S, Satoh K, Furumoto S, Gotoh R, Koyama M, Yoshioka S, Takahashi T, Takahashi K, Yanagisawa T, Fukuda H. Changes in regional cerebral blood flow during self-paced arm and finger movements. A PET study. Brain Res. 1996;716(1-2):141-48.
51. Kawashima R, Matsumura M, Sadato N, Naito E, Waki A, Nakamura S, Matsunami K, Fukuda H, Yonekura Y. Regional cerebral blood flow changes in human brain related to ipsilateral and contralateral complex hand movements - A PET study. Eur J Neurosci. 1998;10(7):2254-60.
52. Kawashima R, Roland PE, O'Sullivan BT. Activity in the human primary motor cortex related to ipsilateral hand movements. Brain Res. 1994;663(2):251-56.
53. Kim SG, Ashe J, Hendrich K, Ellermann JM, Merkle H, Ugurbil K, Georgopoulos AP. Functional magnetic resonance imaging of motor cortex: Hemispheric asymmetry and handedness. Science. 1993;261(5121):615-17.
54. Kutas M, Donchin E. Studies of squeezing: Handedness, responding hand, response force, and asymmetry of readiness potential. Science. 1974;186(4163):545-48.
55. Macdonell RA, Shapiro BE, Chiappa KH, Helmers SL, Cros D, Day BJ, Shahani BT. Hemispheric threshold differences for motor evoked potentials produced by magnetic coil stimulation. Neurology. 1991;41(9):1441-44.
56. Matsunami K, Hamada I. Characteristics of the ipsilateral movement-related neuron in the motor cortex of the monkey. Brain Res. 1981;204(1):29-42.
57. Salmelin R, Forss N, Knuutila J, Hari R. Bilateral activation of the human somatomotor cortex by distal hand movements. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1995;95(6):444-52.
58. Taniguchi M, Yoshimine T, Cheyne D, Kato A, Kihara T, Ninomiya H, Hirata M, Hirabuki N, Nakamura H, Hayakawa T. Neuromagnetic fields preceding unilateral movements in dextrals and sinistrals. Neuroreport. 1998;9(7):1497-1502.
59. Tanji J, Okano K, Sato KC. Neuronal activity in cortical motor areas related to ipsilateral, contralateral, and bilateral digit movements of the monkey. J Neurophysiol. 1988;60(1):325-43.
60. Urbano A, Babiloni C, Onorati P, Babiloni F. Human cortical activity related to unilateral movements. A high resolution EEG study. Neuroreport. 1996;8(1):203-6.
61. Viviani P, Perani D, Grassi F, Bettinardi V, Fazio F. Hemispheric asymmetries and bimanual asynchrony in left- and right-handers. Exp Brain Res. 1998;120(4):531-36.
62. Volkmann J, Schnitzler A, Witte OW, Freund H. Handedness and asymmetry of hand representation in human motor cortex. J Neurophysiol. 1998;79(4):2149-54.
63. Amunts K, Schlaug G, Schleicher A, Steinmetz H, Dabringhaus A, Roland PE, Zilles K. Asymmetry in the human motor cortex and handedness. Neuroimage. 1996; 4(3 Pt 1):216-22.
64. Kooistra CA, Heilman KM. Motor dominance and lateral asymmetry of the globus pallidus. Neurology. 1988;38(3):388-90.
65. Snyder PJ, Bilder RM, Wu H, Bogerts B, Lieberman JA. Cerebellar volume asymmetries are related to handedness: A quantitative MRI study. Neuropsychologia. 1995;33(4):407-19.
66. Annett M. Cerebral asymmetry in twins: Predictions of the right shift theory. Neuropsychologia. 2003;41(4):469-79.
67. Klar AJ. Human handedness and scalp hair-whorl direction develop from a common genetic mechanism. Genetics. 2003;165(1):269-76.
68. McManus IC. Right- and left-hand skill: Failure of the right shift model. Br J Psychol. 1985;76(Pt 1):1-34.
69. McManus IC. The inheritance of left-handedness. Ciba Found Symp. 1991;162:251-67; discussion 267-81.
70. Woodworth RS. The accuracy of voluntary movement. Psychol Monogr. 1899;3(2):1-114.
71. Fitts PM. Cognitive aspects of information processing. 3. Set for speed versus accuracy. J Exp Psychol. 1966;71(6):849-57.
72. Fitts PM. The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement (1954). Reprinted in: J Exp Psychol Gen. 1992;121(3):262-69.
73. Fitts PM, Radford BK. Information capacity of discrete motor responses under different cognitive sets. J Exp Psychol. 1966;71(4):475-82.
74. Flowers K. Handedness and controlled movement. Br J Psychol. 1975;66(1):39-52.
75. Carson RG. Manual asymmetries: Old problems and new directions. Hum Mov Sci. 1993;12(5):479-506.
76. Elliott D, Chua R, Pollock BJ. The influence of intermittent vision on manual aiming. Acta Psychol (Amst). 1994;85(1):1-13.
77. Elliott D, Lyons J, Chua R, Goodman D, Carson RG. The influence of target perturbation on manual aiming asymmetries in right-handers. Cortex. 1995;31(4):685-97.
78. Roy EA, Kalbfleisch L, Elliott D. Kinematic analyses of manual asymmetries in visual aiming movements. Brain Cogn. 1994;24(2):289-95.
79. Todor JI, Cisneros J. Accommodation to increased accuracy demands by the right and left hands. J Mot Behav. 1985;17(3):355-72.
80. Todor JI, Doane T. Handedness classification: Preference versus proficiency. Percept Mot Skills. 1977;45(3 Pt 2):1041-42.
81. Plamondon R, Alimi AM. Speed/accuracy trade-offs in target-directed movements. Behav Brain Sci. 1997;20(2):279-303; discussion 303-49.
82. Carson RG. Visual feedback processing and manual asymmetries: An evolving perspective. In: Proteau L, Elliott D, editors. Vision and motor control (Advances in psychology). Amsterdam (the Netherlands): North-Holland; 1992. p. 49-65.
83. Carson RG, Chua R, Elliott D, Goodman D. The contribution of vision to asymmetries in manual aiming. Neuropsychologia. 1990;28(11):1215-20.
84. Roy EA, Elliott D. Manual asymmetries in visually directed aiming. Can J Psychol. 1986;40(2):109-21.
85. Carson RG, Goodman D, Chua R, Elliott D. Asymmetries in the regulation of visually guided aiming. J Mot Behav. 1993;25(1):21-32.
86. Bagesteiro LB, Sainburg RL. Interlimb transfer of load compensation during rapid elbow joint movements. Exp Brain Res. 2005;161(2):155-65.
87. Bagesteiro LB, Sainburg RL. Nondominant arm advantages in load compensation during rapid elbow joint movements. J Neurophysiol. 2003;90(3):1503-13.
88. Annett J, Annett M, Hudson PT, Turner A. The control of movement in the preferred and non-preferred hands. Q J Exp Psychol. 1979;31:641-52.
89. Carson RG, Chua R, Goodman D, Byblow WD, Elliott D. The preparation of aiming movements. Brain Cogn. 1995;28(2):133-54.
90. Todor JI, Kyprie PM. Hand differences in the rate and variability of rapid tapping. J Mot Behav. 1980;12(1):57-62.
91. Todor JI, Smiley-Oyen AL. Force modulation as a source of hand differences in rapid finger tapping. Acta Psychol. 1987;65:65-73.
92. Elliott D, Roy EA, Goodman D, Carson RG. Asymmetries in the preparation and control of manual aiming movements. Can J Exp Psychol. 1993;47(3):570-89.
93. Mieschke PE, Elliott D, Helsen WF, Carson RG, Coull JA. Manual asymmetries in the preparation and control of goal-directed movements. Brain Cogn. 2001;45(1):129-40.
94. Sainburg RL. Handedness: Differential specializations for control of trajectory and position. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2005;33(4):206-13.
95. Ghez C, Sainburg R. Proprioceptive control of interjoint coordination. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1995;73(2):273-84.
96. Gribble PL, Ostry DJ. Compensation for interaction torques during single- and multijoint limb movement. J Neurophysiol. 1999;82(5):2310-26.
97. Sainburg RL, Ghez C, Kalakanis D. Intersegmental dynamics are controlled by sequential anticipatory, error correction, and postural mechanisms. J Neurophysiol. 1999;81(3):1040-56.
98. Sainburg RL, Ghilardi MF, Poizner H, Ghez C. Control of limb dynamics in normal subjects and patients without proprioception. J Neurophysiol. 1995;73(2):820-35.
99. Bagesteiro LB, Sainburg RL. Handedness: Dominant arm advantages in control of limb dynamics. J Neurophysiol. 2002;88(5):2408-21.
100. Sainburg RL, Kalakanis D. Differences in control of limb dynamics during dominant and nondominant arm reaching. J Neurophysiol. 2000;83(5):2661-75.
101. Sainburg RL, Eckhardt RB. Optimization through lateralization: The evolution of handedness. Behav Brain Sci. 2005;28:611-12.
102. Sainburg RL, Schaefer SY. Interlimb differences in control of movement extent. J Neurophysiol. 2004;92(3):1374-83.
103. Ghez C, Hening W, Gordon J. Organization of voluntary movement. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 199;1(4):664-71.
104. Gordon J, Ghez C. Trajectory control in targeted force impulses. II. Pulse height control. Exp Brain Res. 1987;67(2):241-52.
105. Gordon J, Ghez C. Trajectory control in targeted force impulses. III. Compensatory adjustments for initial errors. Exp Brain Res. 1987;67(2):253-69.
106. Gottlieb GL, Corcos DM, Agarwal GC. Organizing principles for single-joint movements. I. A speed-insensitive strategy. J Neurophysiol. 1989;62(2):342-57.
107. Gottlieb GL, Corcos DM, Agarwal GC, Latash ML. Organizing principles for single joint movements. III. Speed-insensitive strategy as a default. J Neurophysiol. 1990; 63(3):625-36.
108. Gottlieb GL, Latash ML, Corcos DM, Liubinskas TJ, Agarwal GC. Organizing principles for single joint movements: V. Agonist-antagonist interactions. J Neurophysiol. 1992;67(6):1417-27.
109. Brown SH, Cooke JD. Initial agonist burst duration depends on movement amplitude. Exp Brain Res. 1984;55(3):523-27.
110. Brown SH, Cooke JD. Initial agonist burst is modified by perturbations preceding movement. Brain Res. 1986;377(2):311-22.
111. Brown SH, Cooke JD. Movement-related phasic muscle activation. I. Relations with temporal profile of movement. J Neurophysiol. 1990;63(3):455-64.
112. Brown SH, Cooke JD. Responses to force perturbations preceding voluntary human arm movements. Brain Res. 1981;220(2):350-55.
113. Cooke JD, Brown S, Forget R, Lamarre Y. Initial agonist burst duration changes with movement amplitude in a deafferented patient. Exp Brain Res. 1985;60(1):184-87.
114. Cooke JD, Brown SH. Movement-related phasic muscle activation. II. Generation and functional role of the triphasic pattern. J Neurophysiol. 1990;63(3):465-72.
115. Corcos DM, Gottlieb GL, Agarwal GC. Organizing principles for single-joint movements. II. A speed-sensitive strategy. J Neurophysiol. 1989;62(2):358-68.
116. Ghez C, Gordon J. Trajectory control in targeted force impulses. I. Role of opposing muscles. Exp Brain Res. 1987;67(2):225-40.
117. Marzke MW, Toth N, Schick K, Reece S, Steinberg B, Hunt K, Linscheid RL, An KN. EMG study of hand muscle recruitment during hard hammer percussion manufacture of Oldowan tools. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1998;105(3):315-32.
118. Haaland KY, Harrington DL. Limb-sequencing deficits after left but not right hemisphere damage. Brain Cogn. 1994;24(1):104-22. Erratum in: Brain Cogn. 1995;27(1): 134.
119. Prestopnik J, Haaland K, Knight R, Lee R. Hemispheric dominance in the parietal lobe for open and closed loop movements. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2003;9:1-2.