Could plant leaves be treated as Lambertian surfaces in dense crop canopies to estimate light absorption?

Ecological Modelling

Volumn 198, Issue 1-2, 2006, Pages 219-228

  Chelle, Michaël ^a  

^a UMR 1402 ECOSYS   (France)

Author keywords

BRDF; Crop canopy; Lambert law; Light microclimate; Optical properties; Ray tracing

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATION THEORY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CROPS; LIGHT ABSORPTION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; RAY TRACING; TEMPERATURE DISTRIBUTION;

CROP CANOPY; LAMBERT LAW; LIGHT MICROCLIMATE; PHOTOSYNTHETICALLY ACTIVE RADIATION (PAR);

PLANTS (BOTANY);

ABSORPTION; CANOPY; CROP; LEAF; LIGHT; MONTE CARLO ANALYSIS; OPTICAL PROPERTY; SIMULATION; SOLAR RADIATION; SURFACE;

FARM CROPS; LIGHT ABSORPTION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PLANTS;

LAMBERTIA;

EID: 33747833730     PISSN: 03043800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.04.010     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Allen W., Gaussman H., and Richardson A. Willstäter-Stoll theory of leaf reflectance evaluation by ray tracing. Appl. Opt. 12 (1973) 2448-2453
2. Baranoski G., and Rokne J. Efficiently simulating scattering of light by leaves. Visual Comput. 17 (2001) 491-505
3. Born M., and Wolf E. Principle of Optics (1999), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK 986 pp
4. Bousquet L., Lachérade S., Jacquemoud S., and Moya I. Leaf BRDF measurements and model for specular and diffuse components differentiation. Rem. Sens. Environ. 98 (2005) 201-211
5. Brakke T. Specular and diffuse components of radiation scattered by leaves. Agric. For. Meteorol. 71 (1994) 283-295
6. Breece H., and Holmes R. Bidirectional scattering characteristics of healthy green soybean and corn leaves in vivo. Appl. Opt. 10 (1971) 119-127
7. Chelle, M., 1997. Développement d'un modèle de radiosité mixte pour simuler la distribution du rayonnement dans les couverts végétaux. PhD thesis, Computer Science Department, Université de Rennes I, France. 160 pp. (in French).
8. Chelle M., and Andrieu B. The nested radiosity model for the distribution of light within plant canopies. Ecol. Model. 111 (1998) 75-91
9. Chelle M., and Andrieu B. Radiative models for architectural modeling. Agronomie 19 (1999) 225-240
10. Disney M., Lewis P., and North P. Monte Carlo methods in optical canopy reflectance modelling. Rem. Sens. Environ. 18 (2000) 163-196
11. Drouet J.-L., and Pagès L. GRAAL: a model of GRowth. Architecture and carbon ALlocation during the vegetative phase of the whole maize plant: model description and parameterisation. Ecol. Model. 165 (2003) 147-173
12. Drouet J.L. MODICA and MODANCA: modelling the three-dimensional shoot structure of graminaceous crops from two methods of plant description. Field Crops Res. 83 (2003) 215-222
13. España M., Baret F., Aries F., Chelle M., Andrieu B., and Prevot L. Modeling maize canopy 3D architecture-application to reflectance simulation. Ecol. Model. 122 (1999) 25-43
14. Fournier C., and Andrieu B. A 3D architectural and process-based model of maize development. Ann. Bot. 81 (1998) 233-250
15. Gautier H., Mech R., Prusinkiewicz P., and Varlet-Grancher C. 3D architectural modelling of aerial photomorphogenesis in white clover (Trifolium repens L.) using L-systems. Ann. Bot. 85 (2000) 359-370
16. Goel N.S., and Strebel D.E. Simple Beta distribution representation of leaf orientation in vegetation canopies. Agron. J. 75 (1991) 800-802
17. Govaerts, Y., 1995. A model of light scattering in 3D plant canopies: a Monte Carlo ray tracing approach. PhD Thesis, Physic Department, Université Catholique de Louvain, Belgique, 165 pp.
18. Govaerts Y., Jacquemoud S., Verstraete M., and Ustin S. Three-dimensional transfer modeling in a dicotyledon leaf. Appl. Opt. 35 (1996) 6585-6598
19. Grimm V., Wyszomirski T., Aikman D., and Uchmanski J. Individual-based modelling and ecological theory: synthesis of a workshop. Ecol. Model. 115 (1999) 275-282
20. Gutschick V., Baron M., Waechter D., and Wolf M. Portable monitor for solar radiation that accumulates irradiance histograms for 32 leaf-mounted sensors. Agric. For. Meteorol. 33 (1985) 281-290
21. Hammersley J.M., and Handscomb D.C. Monte Carlo Methods (1964), Wiley 184 pp
22. Jacquemoud S., and Baret F. PROSPECT: a model of leaf optical properties. Rem. Sens. Environ. 41 (1990) 123-132
23. Jacquemoud S., Combes D., Moya I., Sinoquet H., and Varlet-Grancher C. A new device to measure leaf spectral and bidirectional optical properties. Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Multiangular Measurements and Models (IWMMM-3). Steamboat Springs, CO, USA (2002)
24. Kumar R., and Silva L. Light ray tracing through a leaf cross section. Appl. Opt. 12 (1973) 2950-2954
25. Kuusk A., and Nilson T. A reflectance model for the homogeneous plant canopy and its inversion. Rem. Sens. Environ. 27 (1989) 157-167
26. Lafarge M., Mazel C., and Hill D. A modelling of the tillering capable of reproducing the fine-scale horizontal heterogeneity of a pure grass sward and its dynamics. Ecol. Model. 183 (2005) 125-141
27. Maier S., Lüdeker W., and Günther K. SLOP: a revised version of the stochastic model for leaf optical properties. Rem. Sens. Environ. 68 (1999) 273-280
28. Nicodemus, F. E., Richmond, J. C., Hsia, J. J., Ginsberg, I. W. and Limperis, T., 1977. Geometric Considerations and Nomenclature for Reflectance, National Bureau of Standards (US), Monograph #161.
29. Orians C.M., and Jones C.G. Plants as resource mosaics: a functional model for predicting patterns of within-plant resource heterogeneity to consumers based on vascular architecture and local environmental variability. Oikos 94 (2001) 493-504
30. Perez R., Seals R., Michalsky J., and Ineichen P. An all-weather model for sky luminance distribution. Solar Energy 51 (1993) 423
31. Prusinkiewicz P. Modeling of spatial structure and development of plants: a review. Sci. Hort. 74 (1998) 113-149
32. Ross J.K. The Radiation Regime and Architecture of Plant Stands (1981), Junk Publ., Den Hague, Holland 391 pp
33. Ross J.K., and Marshak A.L. Calculation of canopy bidirectional reflectance using the Monte Carlo method. Rem. Sens. Environ. 24 (1988) 213-225
34. Ross J.K., and Marshak A.L. The influence of leaf orientation and the specular component of leaf reflectance on the canopy bidirectional reflectance. Rem. Sens. Environ. 27 (1989) 251-260
35. Rubinstein R. Simulation and Monte Carlo method (1981), Wiley, Hoboken, USA 304 pp
36. Sanz C., España M., Baret F., Vaillant L., Hanocq J.F., Sarrouy C., Clastre P., Bruguier N., Chelle M., Andrieu B., and Zurfluh O. Bidirectional characteristics of leaf reflectance and transmittance: measurement and influence on canopy bidirectional reflectance. In: Guyot G., and Phulpin T. (Eds). Physical Measurements and Signatures in Remote Sensing (1997), Bakelma, Rotterdam, The Netherlands 583-590
37. Sinclair T., Schreiber M., and Hoffer R. Diffuse reflectance hypothesis for the pathway of solar radiation through leave. Agron. J. 65 (1973) 276-283
38. Sinoquet H., and Rivet P. Measurement and visualization of the architecture of an adult tree based on a three-dimensional digitising device. Trees 11 (1997) 265-270
39. Soler C., Sillion F.X., Blaise F., Blaise F., and de Reffye P. An efficient instantiation algorithm for simulating radiant energy transfer in plant models. ACM Trans. Graph. 22 (2003) 204-233
40. Venable W.V. Comment on reciprocity failure. Appl. Opt. 24 (1985) 39-43
41. Walter-Shea E.A., Norman J.M., and Blad B.L. Leaf bidirectional reflectance and transmittance in corn and soybean. Rem. Sens. Environ. 29 (1989) 161-174
42. Zibordi G., and Voss K.J. Geometrical and spectral distribution of sky radiance: comparison between simulations and field measurements. Rem. Sens. Environ. 27 (1989) 343-358