Workplace logics, kinds of knowledge and action research

Systemic Practice and Action Research

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 189-200

  Hansson, Thomas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN DENMARK   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Common ground; Design; Textual and actionable knowledge

Indexed keywords

EID: 33747664353     PISSN: 1094429X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11213-006-9011-y     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Argyris C (1993) Teaching smart people how to learn. In: Howard R, Haas R (eds) The learning imperative. Managing people for continuous innovation. A Harvard Business Review Book, pp 177-194
2. Banathy B (1996) Designing social systems in a changing world. Plenum Press, New York
3. Boud D (2004) The elusive learner and productive perspectives: Linking workplace learning research to practice. "Workplace Learning" 26 November 2004. Learning Lab Denmark, Copenhagen
4. Bouwen R, Fry R (1991) Organizational innovation and learning. Inst Studies Mgt Org 21(4):37-51
5. Burke WW (1994) Organizational development: A process of learning and changing. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Massachussetts
6. Chen HT (1990) Theory-driven evaluations. Sage Publications, London
7. Dyer G (2004) Repositing thinking for future social systems design: In tribute to Bela H. Banathy and his inspiration of Fuschl conversations. SPAR 17(4):307-321
8. Ellström P-E (2002) Lärande - i spänningsfeltet mellan produktionens och utvecklingens logik. In: Abrahamsson K, Abrahamsson L, Björkman T, Ellström P-E, Johansson J (eds) Utbildning, kompetens och arbete. Lund, Studentlitteratur
9. Engeström Y, et al. (1999) The importance of knotworking. In: Chaiklin S, Hedegaard M, Jensen UJ (eds) Activity theory and social practice: Cultural-historical approaches. Aarhus University Press, pp 345-374
10. Engeström Y (2000) Udviklingsarbejde som uddannelsesforskning - Ti års tilbageblik ind i zonen for den nærmeste udvikling. In: Illeris K (ed) Tekster om læring. Roskilde Universitetsforlag, København, pp 270-283
11. Engeström Y (2004) New forms of learning in co-configuration work. J Workpl Learn 16(1/2):11-21
12. Hansson T (2002) Leadership by activity theory and professional development by social construction. SPAR 15(5):411-436
13. Hwang A-S (2000) Toward fostering systems learning in organizational contexts. SPAR 13(3):329-343
14. Kirschner P (2004) Design. Development, and implementation of electronic learning environments for collaborative learning. Edu Tech Res Dev 52(3):39-46
15. March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Org Sc 2(1):71-87
16. Parsons T (1968) Interaction. Sills D (ed) International encyklopedia of the social sciences, vol 7. Free Press, New York, pp 429-441
17. Phillips L (1996) Rhetoric and the spread of the discourse of Thatcherism. Disc Soc 7(2):209-241
18. Pierce JL, Gardner DG (2002) Management and organizational behaviour: An integrated approach. Southwestern
19. Pålshaugen Ø (2004) Knowledge at work. New stories from action research. Conc Transf 9(2):113-119
20. Reason P, Torbert WR (2001) Toward a transformational social science: A further look at the scientific merits of action research. Cone Transf 6(1):1-37
21. Squire K, Reigeluth C (2000) The many faces of systemic change. Educ Horizons. 78(3):143-152
22. Tenkasi V, Hay G (2004) Actionable knowledge and scolar-practitioners: A process model of theory-practice linkages. SPAR 17(3):177-206
23. Turner S (1991) Social constructionism and social theory. Soc Theory 9(1):22-33
24. Vygotsky L (1978) Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass
25. van der Veer R, Valsiner J (1991) Understanding vygotsky. A quest for synthesis. Basil Blackwell, Oxford
26. Walton D (2004) Modeling organizational systems: Banathy's three lenses revisited. SPAR 17(4):265-284
27. Wartofsky M (1979) Models: Representation and scientific understanding. Reidel, Dordrecht
28. Zimmer B (2001) Practising what we teach in teaching systems practice: The action-learning cycle. SPAR 14(6):697-713