Actionable knowledge and scholar-practitioners: A process model of theory-practice linkages

Systemic Practice and Action Research

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 177-206

  Tenkasi, Ramkrishnan V ^a   Hay, George W ^b  

^a BENEDICTINE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b McDonald's   (United States)

Author keywords

Actionable knowledge; Activity theory; Scholar practitioner; Theory practice integration

Indexed keywords

EID: 3042813316     PISSN: 1094429X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/B:SPAA.0000031697.76777.ac     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Adler, N., and Shani, R. (2001). In search of an alternative framework for the creation of actionable knowledge: Table-tennis research at Ericsson. Res. Organ. Change Dev. 13, 43-79.
2. Adler, N., Shani, R., and Styhre, A. (2003). Collaborative Research in organizations, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
3. Alderfer, C. (1977). Organization development. Ann. Rev. Psychol. 28, 197-233.
4. Astley, W., and Zammuto, R. (1993). Organization science, managers, and language games. Organ Sci. 3, 443-460.
5. Austin, J., and Bartunek, J. (2003). Theories and practices of organization development. In Borman, W., Ilgen, D., and Klimoski, R. (eds.), Handbook of Psychology, Volume 12, Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Wiley, New York.
6. Burgess, M. (2003). What is the theory of system administration? In Proceedings of the Fourteenth Systems Administration Conference (LISA XIV), Berkeley, CA.
7. Eisenhardt, K. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Acad. Manage. Rev. 14(4), 532-550.
8. Eslbach, K., and Sutton, R. (1992). Acquiring organizational legitimacy through illegitimate actions: A marriage of institutional and impression management theories. Acad. Manage. J. 35(4), 699-738.
9. Fleck, L. (1981). Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
10. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., and Trow, M. (1994). The New Production of Knowledge, Sage, London.
11. Glaser, B., and Strauss, A. (1999). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research, Hawthorne, Aldine de Gruyter, New York.
12. Hay, G. (2003). The nature and significance of the executive doctoral scholar-practitioner of Organizational Development and Change: A morphogenetic account of theory-practice linkages for the achievement of scholarly knowledge and business results. Dissertation Abstracts International, 64 (05A), 1747. (University Microfilms No. AAT 3092850)
13. Hodgkinson, G., Herriot, P., and Anderson, N. (Special Issue, 2001). Re-aligning the stakeholders in management research: Lessons from industrial, work and organizational psychology. Br. J. Manage. 12, S41-S48.
14. Huff, A., and Huff, J. (Special Issue, 2001). Refocusing the business school agenda. Br. J. Manage. 12, S49-S54.
15. Kaptelinin, V., and Nardi, B. (1997). Activity theory: Basic concepts and applications. In Proceedings of the Computer-Human Interaction (CHI) interest group, Conference on Human Factors in computing systems, Atlanta, Georgia.
16. Lawler, E., III, Mohrman, A., Jr., Mohrman, S., Ledford, G., Cummings, T., and Associates (eds.). (1999). Doing Research That is Useful for Theory and Practice, Lexington Books, Lanham, MD.
17. Lektorsky, V. A. (1980). Subject Object Cognition, Progress Publishers, Moscow.
18. Leontyev, A. N. (1978). Activity, Consciousness and Personality, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
19. Leontyev, A. N. (1979). Problems of the Development of the Mind, Progress Publishers, Moscow.
20. Luria, A. (1981). Language and Cognition, Wiley, New York.
21. Miettinen, R. (1997). The concept of activity in the analysis of heterogeneous networks in the innovation process. Paper Presented at the CSTT Workshop, "Actor Network and After"; Department of Education, University of Helsinki.
22. Mohr, L. (1982). Explaining Organizational Behavior, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
23. Muhr (1997). ATLAS.TI, Scientific Software Development, Berlin, Germany.
24. Oliver, M. (2001). What's the Purpose of Theory in Learning Technology? Working Paper, Higher Education Research and Development Unit, University College, London.
25. Ryle, G. (1949). The Concept of Mind, Hutchinson & Company, London.
26. Ryder, M. (2003). Spinning webs of significance. Working Paper, University of Colorado, Denver.
27. Rynes, S., Bartunek, J., and Daft, R. (2001). Across the great divide: Knowledge creation and transfer between practitioners and academics. Acad. Manage. J. 44, 340-355.
28. Silverman, D. (2001). Interpreting Qualitative Data, 2nd edn., Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
29. Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and Language, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
30. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
31. Vygotsky, L. S. (1979). Consciousness as a problem in the psychology of behavior. Soviet Psychology 17(4), 3-35.
32. Weber, R. (1990). Basic Content Analysis, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
33. Weick, K. (1979). The Social Psychology of Organizing, McGraw-Hill, New York.
34. Weick, K. (1993). The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: The Mann Gulch disaster. Adm. Sci. Q. 38(4), 628-652.
35. Yin, R. (1994). Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.