The seductive quality of central human capabilities: Sociological insights into Nussbaum and Sen's disagreement

Economy and Society

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 423-452

  Feldman, Shelley ^a   Gellert, Paul ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Capability; Democratic deliberation; Historical sociology; Nussbaum; Sen; Universalism

Indexed keywords

EQUITY; POLITICAL THEORY; POWER RELATIONS; SOCIAL JUSTICE;

EID: 33747620318     PISSN: 03085147     EISSN: 14695766     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03085140600845008     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Abrahamsen, Rita.(2000) Disciplining Democracy: Development Discourse and Good Governance in Africa. London: Zed Books.
2. Abrams, Philip. (1988) 'Notes on the difficulty of studying the state (1977)' Journal of Historical Sociology, 1(1), pp. 58-89.
3. Agarwal, Bina and Humphries, Jane and Robeyns, Ingrid. (2003) 'Exploring the challenges of Amartya Sen's work and ideas: An introduction' Feminist Economics, 9(2-3), pp. 3-12.
4. Alkire, Sabina.(2002) Valuing Freedoms: Sen's Capability Approach and Poverty Reduction. New York: Oxford University Press.
5. Anderson, Elizabeth. (2003) 'Sen, ethics and democracy' Feminist Economics, 9(2-3), pp. 239-61.
6. Arrighi, Giovanni.(1990) 'The developmentalist illusion: A reconceptualization of the semiperiphery'. In Semiperipheral States in the World-Economy. (pp. 11-42). New York: Greenwood Press.
7. Babb, Sarah L.(2001) Managing Mexico: Economists from Nationalism to Neoliberalism. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
8. Booth, David. (1985) 'Marxism and development sociology: Interpreting the impasse' World Development, 13(July), pp. 761-87.
9. Cardoso, Fernando Henrique.(1979) Dependency and Development in Latin America. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.
10. Corbridge, Stuart. (2002) 'Development as freedom: The spaces of Amartya Sen' Progress in Development Studies, 2(3), pp. 183-217.
11. Corrigan, Philip and Sayer, Derek.(1985) The Great Arch: English State Formation as Cultural Revolution. Oxford: Blackwell.
12. Crocker, David.(1995) 'Functioning and capability; the foundations of Sen's and Nussbaum's development ethic, Part 2'. In Women, Culture, and Development: A Study of Human Capabilities. (pp. 153-98). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
13. Crocker, David.(forthcoming) 'Sen and deliberative democracy'. In Capabilities Equality: Basic Issues and Problems. London: Routledge.
14. Cronin, Ciarin and De Greiff, Pablo.(2002) 'Introduction: Normative responses to current challenges of global governance'. In Global Justice and Transnational Politics. (pp. 1-33). Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
15. Deneulin, Severine. (2002) 'Perfectionism, paternalism and liberalism in Sen and Nussbaum's capability approach' Review of Political Economy, 14(4), pp. 497-518.
16. Evans, Peter B.(1979) Dependent Development: The Alliance of Multinational, State, and Local Capital in Brazil. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
17. Evans, Peter B.(1995) Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
18. Evans, Peter B. (2002) 'Collective capabilities, culture, and Amartya Sen's development as freedom' Studies in Comparative International Development, 37(2), pp. 54-60.
19. Evans, Peter B. and Rueschemeyer, Dietrich and Skocpol, Theda.(1985) Bringing the State Back In. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Evans, Tony. (2001) 'If democracy, then human rights?' Third World Quarterly, 22(4), pp. 623-42.
21. Ferguson, James.(1994) The Anti-Politics Machine: 'Development,' Depoliticization, and Bureaucratic Power in Lesotho. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota Press.
22. Frank, Andre Gunder.(1969) Capitalism and Underdevelopment in Latin America: Historical Studies of Chile and Brazil. New York: Monthly Review Press.
23. Fraser, Nancy. (1995) 'From redistribution to recognition? Dilemmas of justice in a "post-socialist" age' New Left Review, 212, pp. 68-93.
24. Fraser, Nancy. (2001) 'Recognition without ethics?' Theory Culture & Society, 18, pp. 21-42.
25. Fraser, Nancy.(2003) 'Social Justice in the Age of Identity Politics: Redistribution, Recognition, and Participation'. In Redistribution or Recognition? A Political-Philosophical Exchange. (pp. 7-109). London and New York: Verso.
26. Fraser, Nancy. (2005) 'Reframing justice in a globalizing world' New Left Review, 36, pp. 69-88.
27. Gasper, Des. (1997) 'Sen's capability approach and Nussbaum's capabilities ethic' Journal of International Development, 9(2), pp. 281-302.
28. Gasper, Des. (2000) 'Development as freedom: Taking economics beyond commodities - the cautious boldness of Amartya Sen' Journal of International Developmen, 12(7), pp. 989-1001.
29. GasperDes (2001) 'Review of women and human development: The capabilities approach', IDEA Newslette June.
30. -. (2002) Is sen's Capability Approach an Adequate Basis for Considering Human Development? Review of Political Economy, 14, pp. 435-61.
31. Gasper, Des and van Staveren, Irene. (2003) 'Development as freedom, and as what else?' Feminist Economics, 9(2-3), pp. 137-61.
32. Hall, Stuart.(1988) 'The toad in the garden: Thatcherism among the theorists. In Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture. (pp. 35-73). Champaign-Urbana IL: University of Illinois Press.
33. Hill, Marianne T. (2003) 'Development as empowerment' Feminist Economics, 9(2-3), pp. 117-35.
34. Koggel, Christine. (2003) 'Globalization and women's paid work: expanding freedom?' Feminist Economics, 9(2-3), pp. 163-84.
35. Lawson, Tony. (1999) 'Feminism, realism, and universalism' Feminist Economics, 5(2), pp. 25-59.
36. Menon, Nivedita. (2002) 'Universalism without foundations?' Economy and Society, 31(February), pp. 152-69.
37. Migdal, Joel S.(1988) Strong Societies and Weak States: State-Society Relations and State Capabilities in the Third World. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
38. Nussbaum, Martha C.(2000a) Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39. Nussbaum, Martha C. (2000b) 'Aristotle, politics, and human capabilities: A response to Antony, Arneson, Charlesworth, and Mulgan' Ethics, 111(1), pp. 102-40.
40. Nussbaum, Martha C. (2001) 'Comment on "Feminist theory, justice, and the lure of the human"' Signs, 27(1), pp. 123-35.
41. Nussbaum, Martha C. (2003) 'Capabilities as fundamental entitlements: Sen and social justice' Feminist Economics, 9(2-3), pp. 33-59.
42. Nussbaum, Martha C. (2004) 'Beyond the social contract: Capabilities and global justice' Oxford Development Studies, 32(1), pp. 3-18.
43. Nussbaum, Martha C. (2004b) Beyond the Social Contract: Capabilities and Global Justice' Oxford Development Studies, 12, pp. 3-18.
44. Nussbaum, Martha C. and Sen, Amartya.(1989) 'Internal criticism and Indian rationalist traditions'. In Relativism: Interpretation and Confrontation. (pp. 299-325). Notre Dame IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
45. Nussbaum, Martha C. and Sen, Amartya.(1993) The Quality of Life. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
46. Okin, Susan M. (2003) 'Poverty, well-being, and gender: What counts, who's heard' Philosophy and Public Affairs, 31(3), pp. 280-316.
47. Orloff, Ann Shola.(1993) The Politics of Pensions: A Comparative Analysis of Britain, Canada, and the United States, 1880-1940. Madison WI: The University of Wisconsin Press.
48. Pempel, T. J.(1999) 'The developmental regime in a changing world economy'. In The Developmental State. (pp. 137-81). Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.
49. Pettit, Philip. (2001) 'Symposium on Amartya Sen's philosophy: 1, capability and freedom: A defense of Sen' Economics and Philosophy, 17(April), pp. 1-20.
50. Prendergast, Renee. (2004) 'Development and freedom' Journal of Economic Studies, 31(1), pp. 39-56.
51. Pressman, Steven and Summerfield, Gale. (2002) 'Sen and capabilities' Review of Political Economy, 14(4), pp. 429-34.
52. Qizilbash, Mozaffar. (1997) 'A weakness of the capability approach with respect to gender justice' Journal of International Development, 9(2), pp. 251-62.
53. Qizilbash, Mozaffar. (2002) 'Development, common foes and shared values' Review of Political Economy, 14(4), pp. 463-80.
54. Quillen, Carol. (2001) 'Feminist theory, justice, and the lure of the human' Signs, 27(1), pp. 87-122.
55. Ribot, Jesse C.(2002) Democratic Decentralization of Natural Resources: Institutionalizing Popular Participation. Washington DC: World Resources Institute.
56. Rist, Gilbert.(1997) The History of Development: From Western Origins to Global Faith. New York: Zed Books.
57. Robeyns, Ingrid. (2003) 'Sen's capability approach and gender inequality: Selecting relevant capabilities' Feminist Economics, 9(2-3), pp. 61-92.
58. Robeyns, Ingrid. (2005a) 'The capability approach: A theoretical survey' Journal of Human Development, 6(1), pp. 93-114.
59. Robeyns, Ingrid. (2005b) 'Selecting capabilities for quality of life measurement' Social Indicators Research, 74(1), pp. 191-215.
60. Sen, Amartya.(1980) 'Equality of what?'. In Tanner Lectures on Human Values. (pp. 197-220). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
61. Sen, Amartya.(1990) 'Gender and cooperative conflicts'. In Persistent Inequalities: Women and World Development. (pp. 123-49). New York: Oxford University Press.
62. Sen, Amartya.(1993) 'Capability and well-being'. In The Quality of Life. (pp. 30-53). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
63. Sen, Amartya.(1999a) Development as Freedom. New York: Anchor Books.
64. Sen, Amartya. (1999b) 'Democracy as a universal value' Journal of Democracy, 10(3), pp. 2-17.
65. SenAmartya. (2001) 'Global justice: Beyond international equity', polylog 3. Available at: (accessed 16 May 2005).
66. Sen, Amartya.(2002a) 'Justice across borders'. In Global Justice and Transnational Politics: Essays on the Moral and Political Challenges of Globalization. (pp. 37-51). Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
67. Sen, Amartya. (2002b) 'Response to commentaries' Studies in Comparative International Development, 37(2), pp. 78-86.
68. Sen, Amartya. (2003) 'Why Democratization is not the Same as Westernization: Democracy and Its Global Roots' The New Republic, 229, pp. 28-35.
69. Sen, Amartya. (2004a) 'Dialogue: Capabilities, lists, and public reason: continuing the conversation' Feminist Economics, 10(3), pp. 77-80.
70. Sen, Amartya. (2004b) 'Elements of a theory of human rights' Philosophy and Public Affairs, 32(3), pp. 15-356.
71. Singer, Hans. W. (1997) 'Editorial: The golden age of the Keynesian consensus: The pendulum swings back' World Development, 25(3), pp. 293-5.
72. Skerker, Michael. (2004) 'Nussbaum's capabilities approach and religion' The Journal of Religion, 84(3), pp. 379-409.
73. Stewart, Frances and Deneulin, Severine S. (2002) 'Amartya Sen's contribution to development thinking' Studies in Comparative International Development, 37(2), pp. 61-70.
74. Stiglitz, Joseph.(2002) Globalization and Its Discontents. New York: Norton.
75. UNDP.(1990) Human Development Report: Concept and Measure of Human Development. New York: Oxford University Press.
76. Wallerstein, Immanuel.(1974) The Modern World System I. New York: Academic Press.
77. Wallerstein, Immanuel.(1991) Unthinking Social Science. Cambridge: Polity Press.
78. Young, Iris Marion. (2001) 'Activist challenges to deliberative democracy' Political Theory, 29(5), pp. 670-90.