Feminism, realism, and universalism

Feminist Economics

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 25-59

  Lawson, Tony ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Economic modelling; Feminist epistemology; Human emancipation; Ontology; Realism; Situated knowledge; Standpoint theory; Universalism

Indexed keywords

EID: 0347652932     PISSN: 13545701     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/135457099337932     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Archer, Margaret, Roy Bhaskar, Andrew Collier, Tony Lawson, and Alan Norrie (eds.). 1998. Critical Realism: Essential Readings. London and New York: Routledge.
2. Assiter, Alison. 1996. Enlightened Women: Modernist Feminism in a Postmodern Age. London and New York: Routledge.
3. Badgett, M. V. Lee. 1995. "Gender, Sexuality, and Sexual Orientation: All in the Feminist Family?" Feminist Economics 1(1): 121-39.
4. Berik, Günseli. 1997. "The Need for Crossing the Method Boundaries in Economics Research." Feminist Economics 3(2): 121-6.
5. Bordo, Susan. 1993. "Feminism, Post Modernism and Gender Scepticism," in Unbearable Weight: Feminism, Western Culture, and the Body. The Regents of the University of California. Reprinted in Anne C. Herrmann and Abigail Stewart (eds.). 1994. Theorizing Feminism: Parallel Trends in the Humanities and Social Sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press (page references to the latter).
6. Bordo, Susan. 1993. "Feminism, Post Modernism and Gender Scepticism," in Unbearable Weight: Feminism, Western Culture, and the Body. The Regents of the University of California. Reprinted in Anne C. Herrmann and Abigail Stewart (eds.). 1994. Theorizing Feminism: Parallel Trends in the Humanities and Social Sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press (page references to the latter).
7. Collins, Patricia Hill. 1991. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness and the Politics of Empowerment. London and New York: Routledge.
8. England, Paula. 1993. "The Separative Self: Androcentric Bias in Neoclassical Assumptions," in Marianne A. Ferber and Julie A. Nelson (eds.) Beyond Economic Man: Feminist Theory and Economics, pp. 37-53. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9. Esim, Simel. 1997. "Can Feminist Methodology Reduce Power Hierarchies in Research Settings?" Feminist Economics 3(2): 137-40.
10. Ferber, Marianne A. and Julie A. Nelson (eds.). 1993. Beyond Economic Man: Feminist Theory and Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11. Flax, Jane. 1990. "Postmodernism and Gender Relations in Feminist Theory," in Linda J. Nicholson (ed.) Feminism/Postmodernism, pp. 39-62. London and New York: Routledge.
12. Folbre, Nancy. 1993. "How Does She Know? Feminist Theories of Gender Bias in Economics." History of Political Economy 25(4): 167-84.
13. Fricker, Miranda. 1994. "Knowledge as Construct: Theorizing the Role of Gender in Knowledge," in Kathleen Lennon and Margaret Whitford (eds.) Knowing the Difference: Feminist Perspectives in Methodology. London and New York: Routledge.
14. Garfinkel, Alan. 1981. Forms of Explanation, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
15. Grapard, Ulla. 1995. "Robinson Crusoe: The Quintessential Economic Man?" Feminist Economics 1(1): 33-52.
16. Grimshaw, Jean. 1986. Feminist Philosophers: Women's Perspectives on Philosophical Traditions. Brighton, U.K.: Wheatsheaf Books.
17. Haraway, Donna. 1985. "A Manifesto for Cyborgs: Science, Technology, and Socialist Feminism in the 1980s." Socialist Review 15(2): 65-108. Reprinted in Donna Haraway. 1991. Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature, pp. 149-81, 243-8. New York: Routledge and Chapman & Hall. Also reprinted in Anne Herrmann and Abigail Stewart (eds.) 1994. Theorizing Feminism: Parallel Trends in the Humanities and Social Sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
18. Haraway, Donna. 1985. "A Manifesto for Cyborgs: Science, Technology, and Socialist Feminism in the 1980s." Socialist Review 15(2): 65-108. Reprinted in Donna Haraway. 1991. Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature, pp. 149-81, 243-8. New York: Routledge and Chapman & Hall. Also reprinted in Anne Herrmann and Abigail Stewart (eds.) 1994. Theorizing Feminism: Parallel Trends in the Humanities and Social Sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
19. Haraway, Donna. 1985. "A Manifesto for Cyborgs: Science, Technology, and Socialist Feminism in the 1980s." Socialist Review 15(2): 65-108. Reprinted in Donna Haraway. 1991. Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature, pp. 149-81, 243-8. New York: Routledge and Chapman & Hall. Also reprinted in Anne Herrmann and Abigail Stewart (eds.) 1994. Theorizing Feminism: Parallel Trends in the Humanities and Social Sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
20. _. 1988. "Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective." Feminist Studies 14(3): 575-99. Reprinted in Evelyn Fox Keller and Helen E. Longino (eds.) Feminism and Science. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press (page references to the latter).
21. _. 1988. "Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective." Feminist Studies 14(3): 575-99. Reprinted in Evelyn Fox Keller and Helen E. Longino (eds.) Feminism and Science. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press (page references to the latter).
22. Harding, Sandra. 1993. "Rethinking Standpoint Epistemology: What is 'Strong Objectivity'?" in Linda Alcoff and Elizabeth Potter (eds.) Feminist Epistemologies. London and New York: Routledge. Reprinted in Evelyn Fox Keller and Helen E. Longino (eds.) Feminism and Science. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press (page references to the latter).
23. Harding, Sandra. 1993. "Rethinking Standpoint Epistemology: What is 'Strong Objectivity'?" in Linda Alcoff and Elizabeth Potter (eds.) Feminist Epistemologies. London and New York: Routledge. Reprinted in Evelyn Fox Keller and Helen E. Longino (eds.) Feminism and Science. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press (page references to the latter).
24. _. 1995. "Can Feminist Thought Make Economics More Objective?" Feminist Economics 1(1): 7-32.
25. Hartsock, Nancy C. M. 1983. "The Feminist Standpoint: Developing the Ground for a Specifically Feminist Historical Materialism," in Sandra Harding and Merrill B. Hintikka (eds.) Discovering Reality: Feminist Perspectives on Epistemology, Metaphysics, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science. Dordrecht: Reidel. Reprinted in (for example) Linda Nicholson (ed.) The Second Wave: A Reader in Feminist Theory, pp. 216-40. London and New York: Routledge (page references to the latter version).
26. Hartsock, Nancy C. M. 1983. "The Feminist Standpoint: Developing the Ground for a Specifically Feminist Historical Materialism," in Sandra Harding and Merrill B. Hintikka (eds.) Discovering Reality: Feminist Perspectives on Epistemology, Metaphysics, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science. Dordrecht: Reidel. Reprinted in (for example) Linda Nicholson (ed.) The Second Wave: A Reader in Feminist Theory, pp. 216-40. London and New York: Routledge (page references to the latter version).
27. Hutchings, Kimberly. 1994. "The Personal is International: Feminist Epistemology and the Case of International Relations," in Kathleen Lennon and Margaret Whitford (eds.) Knowing the Difference: Feminist Perspectives in Methodology. London and New York: Routledge.
28. Jacobsen, Joyce P. and Andrew A. Newman. 1997. "What Data Do Economists Use? The Case of Labor Economics and Industrial Relations." Feminist Economics 3(2): 127-30.
29. Lawson, Tony. 1997a. Economics and Reality. London and New York: Routledge.
30. _. 1997b. "Situated Rationality." Journal of Economic Methodology 4(1): 101-25.
31. Lazreg, Marnia. 1994. "Women's Experience and Feminist Epistemology: A Critical Neo-Rationalist Approach," in Kathleen Lennon and Margaret Whitford (eds.) Knowing the Difference: Feminist Perspectives in Methodology. London and New York: Routledge.
32. Lewis, David. 1986. "Causal Explanation," in Philosophical Papers, Vol. II, pp. 214-40. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
33. Lipton, Peter. 1991. Inference to the Best Explanation. London and New York: Routledge.
34. Longino, Helen. 1987. "Can There Be A Feminist Science?" Hypatia 2(3) (Fall). Reprinted in Ann Garry and Marilyn Perasall (eds.). 1996. Women, Knowledge and Reality. London and New York: Routledge.
35. Longino, Helen. 1987. "Can There Be A Feminist Science?" Hypatia 2(3) (Fall). Reprinted in Ann Garry and Marilyn Perasall (eds.). 1996. Women, Knowledge and Reality. London and New York: Routledge.
36. _. 1990. Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Enquiry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
37. McCloskey, Deirdre. 1997. "You Shouldn't Want a Realism If You Have a Rhetoric," mimeo. Erasmus University of Rotterdam and the University of Iowa.
38. McDonald, Martha. 1995. "The Empirical Challenges of Feminist Economics: The Example of Economic Restructuring," in Edith Kuiper and Jolande Sap (eds.) Out of the Margin: Feminist Perspectives on Economics, pp. 175-97. London and New York: Routledge.
39. Nelson, Julie. 1993. "Value-Free or Valueless? Notes on the Pursuit of Detachment in Economics." History of Political Economy 25(4): 121-43.
40. _. 1996. Feminism, Objectivity & Economics. London and New York: Routledge.
41. New, Caroline. 1998. "Realism, Deconstruction and the Feminist Standpoint," mimeo. Bath Spa University College.
42. Nussbaum, Martha C. 1995. "Human Capabilities, Female Human Beings," in Martha C. Nussbaum and Jonathan Glover (eds.) Women, Culture, and Development: A Study of Human Capabilities. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
43. Olmsted, Jennifer C. 1997. "Telling Palestinian Women's Economic Stories." Feminist Economics (3)2: 141-51.
44. Ott, Notburga. 1995. "Fertility and Division of Work in the Family: a Game Theoretic Model of Household Decisions", in Edith Kuiper and Jolonde Sap (eds.) Out of the Margin: Feminist Perspectives on Economics, London and New York: Routledge.
45. Phipps, Shelley A. and Peter S. Burton 1995. "Social/Institutional Variables and Behavior within Households: An Empirical Test using the Luxembourg Income Study." Feminist Economics 1(1): 151-74.
46. Pujol, Michèle. 1995. "Into the Margin," in Edith Kuiper and Jolande Sap (eds.) Out of the Margin: Feminist Perspectives on Economics, pp. 17-35. London and New York: Routledge.
47. _. 1997. "Broadening Economic Data and Methods." Feminist Economics 3(2): 119-20.
48. Redmount, Esther. 1995. "Towards a Feminist Econometrics," in Edith Kuiper and Jolande Sap (eds.) Out of the Margin: Feminist Perspectives on Economics, pp. 216-22. London and New York: Routledge.
49. Salanti, Andrea and Ernesto Screpanti (eds.). 1997. Pluralism in Economics: New Perspectives in History and Methodology. Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar.
50. Scheman, Naomi. 1993. "Though This Be Method, Yet There is Madness in It: Paranoia and Liberal Epistemology," in Louise Antony and Charlotte Witt (eds.) A Mind of One's Own, Boulder, CO: Westview Press. Reprinted in Evelyn Fox Keller and Helen E. Longino (eds.) Feminism and Science, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
51. Scheman, Naomi. 1993. "Though This Be Method, Yet There is Madness in It: Paranoia and Liberal Epistemology," in Louise Antony and Charlotte Witt (eds.) A Mind of One's Own, Boulder, CO: Westview Press. Reprinted in Evelyn Fox Keller and Helen E. Longino (eds.) Feminism and Science, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
52. Seiz, Janet. 1993. "Feminism and the History of Economic Thought." History of Political Economy 25(4): 185-201.
53. _. 1995. "Epistemology and the Tasks of Feminist Economics." Feminist Economics 1(3): 110-18.
54. Smith, Dorothy. 1987. The Everyday World as Problematic. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
55. _. 1990. The Conceptual Practices of Power. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
56. Soper, Kate. 1990. Troubled Pleasures: Writings on Politics, Gender and Hedonism. London and New York: Verso.
57. _. 1991. "Postmodernism, Critical Theory and Critical Realism," in Roy Bhaskar (ed.) A Meeting of Minds. London: The Socialist Society.
58. Strassmann, Diana. 1993a. "Not a Free Market: The Rhetoric of Disciplinary Authority in Economics," in Marianne A. Ferber and Julie A. Nelson (eds.) Beyond Economic Man: Feminist Theory and Economics, pp. 54-68. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
59. _. 1993b. "The Stories of Economics and the Power of the Storyteller." History of Political Economy 25(4): 147-65.
60. _. 1994. "Feminist Thought and Economics; Or, What do the Visigoths Know?" American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings 153-8.
61. _. 1995. "Editorial: Creating a Forum for Feminist Economic Inquiry." Feminist Economics 1(1): 1-5.
62. _ and Livia Polanyi. 1995. "The Economist as Storyteller: What Texts Reveal," in Edith Kuiper and Jolande Sap (eds.) Out of the Margin: Feminist Perspectives on Economics. London and New York: Routledge.
63. Tiles, Mary. 1987. "A Science of Mars or of Venus?" Philosophy 62. Reprinted in Evelyn Fox Keller and Helen E. Longino (eds.) Feminism and Science. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
64. Tiles, Mary. 1987. "A Science of Mars or of Venus?" Philosophy 62. Reprinted in Evelyn Fox Keller and Helen E. Longino (eds.) Feminism and Science. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
65. Van Fraassen, Bas C. 1980. The Scientific Image. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
66. Van Stavern, Irene. 1997. "Focus Groups: Contributing to a Gender-Aware Methodology." Feminist Economics 3(2): 131-7.
67. Weintraub, E. Roy. 1989. "Methodology Doesn't Matter, But the History of Thought Might." Scandinavian Journal of Economics 91(2): 477-93.