Advanced methods in meta-analytic research: Applications and implications for rehabilitation counseling research

Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin

Volumn 49, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 234-246

  Rosenthal, David A ^a   Hoyt, William T ^a   Ferrin, James M ^b   Miller, Susan ^a,c   Cohen, Nicholas D ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b LANGSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33747481694     PISSN: 00343552     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/00343552060490040501     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
2. Bat-Chava, Y. (1993). Antecedents of self-esteem in deaf people: A meta-analytic review. Rehabilitation Psychology, 38(4), 221-234.
3. Bellini, J. L., & Rumrill, P. D. (1999). Research in rehabilitation counseling: A guide to design, methodology, and utilization. Springfield, IL: Thomas.
4. Bolton, B., & Akridge, R. L. (1995). A meta-analysis of skills training programs for rehabilitation clients. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 38, 262-273.
5. Cohen, J. (1988). Set correlation and contingency tables. Applied Psychological Measurement, 12(4), 425-434.
6. Cohen, J. (1994). The earth is round (p < .05). The American Psychologist, 49(12), 997-1003.
7. Cottone, R. (1987). Toward a systemic theoretical framework for vocational rehabilitation. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 17(4), 4-7.
8. Fleiss, J. L. (1994). Measures of effect size for categorical data. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 245-260). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
9. Gleser, L. J., & Olkin, I. (1994). Stochastically dependent effect sizes. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 339-355). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
10. Gliner, J. A., Morgan, G. A., & Harmon, R. J. (2003). Meta-analysis: Formulation and interpretation. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 42, 1376-1380.
11. Hedges, L. V. (1994). Statistical considerations: Measures of effect size for categorical data. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 29-38). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
12. Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
13. Hedges, L. V., & Vevea, J. L. (1998). Fixed- and random-effects models in meta-analysis. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 486-504.
14. Hershenson, D. (2000). Toward a cultural anthropology of disability and rehabilitation. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 43(3), 34-52.
15. Hunt, M. (1997). How science takes stock. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
16. Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (1990). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. London: Sage.
17. Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (1996). Cumulative research knowledge and social policy formulation: The critical role of meta-analysis. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2(2), 324-347.
18. Kirk, R. E. (1982). Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
19. Lambert, M. J., & Hill, C. E. (1994). Assessing psychotherapy outcomes and processes. In A. Bergin & S. Garfield (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (4th ed., pp. 72-113). Oxford, England: Wiley.
20. Larson, D. (Ed.). (1984). Teaching psychological skills. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
21. Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (1993). The efficacy of psychological, educational, and behavioral treatment: Confirmation from meta-analysis. The American Psychologist, 48, 1181-1209.
22. Ottenbacher, K., Msall, M. E., & Lyon, N. (1999). Measuring developmental and functional status in children with disabilities. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 41 (3), 186-194.
23. Raudenbush, S. W. (1994). Random effects models. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 301-321). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
24. Rosenthal, D., Ferrin, M., Wilson, K., & Frain, M. (2005). Acceptance rates of African American versus White consumers of vocational rehabilitation services: A meta-analysis. Journal of Rehabilitation, 71 (3), 36-44.
25. Rosenthal, R. (1994). Parametric measures of effect size. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 231-244). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
26. Serlin, R. C., Wampold, B. E., & Levin, J. R. (2003). Should providers of treatment be regarded as a random factor? If it ain't broke, don't "fix" it: A comment on Siemer and Joormann. Psychological Methods, 8(4), 524-534.
27. Shadish, W. R., & Haddock, C. K. (1994). Combining estimates of effect size. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 261-281). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
28. Smith, M. L., & Glass, G. V. (1977). Meta-analysis of psychotherapy outcome studies. The American Psychologist, 32(9), 752-760.
29. Thompson, B. (2002). What future quantitative social science research could look like: Confidence intervals for effect sizes. Educational Researcher, 31(3), 24-31.
30. Wampold, B. E. (2001). The great psychotherapy debate: Models, methods, and findings. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
31. Wampold, B. E., Mondin, G. W., Moody, M., Stich, F., Benson, K., & Ahn, H. (1997). A meta-analysis of outcome studies comparing bona fide psychotherapies: Empirically, "all must have prizes." Psychological Bulletin, 122, 203-215.
32. White, H. D. (1994). Scientific communication and literature retrieval. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 41-56). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
33. Wilson, D. B., & Lipsey, M. W. (2001). The role of method in treatment effectiveness research: Evidence from meta-analysis. Psychological Methods, 6, 413-429.