The use of land evaluation information by land use planners and decision-makers: A case study in Santa Catarina, Brazil

Soil Use and Management

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 12-18

  Bacic, I L Z ^a   Rossiter, D G ^a   Bregt, A K ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^b WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Brazil; Land evaluation; Land use

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION; LAND EVALUATION; LAND USE; QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY;

BRAZIL;

EID: 0037346152     PISSN: 02660032     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1079/SUM2002154     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Bacic ILZ 1998. Development of a land evaluation method for the southern agro-ecological zone of Santa Catarina State-Brazil. MSc. Thesis International Institute for Aerospace Survey and Earth Sciences (ITC).
2. Bartelli LJ 1966. Soil surveys and land use planning. Soil Science Society of America and American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin.
3. Beckett PHT 1968. Method and scale of land resource survey, in relation to precision and cost. In: Land evaluation: Papers of a CSIRO Symposium, organized in cooperation with UNESCO, Canberra 26-31 August 1968, ed GA Stewart, Macmillan Company of Australia, South Melbourne, pp 53-63.
4. Bennema J Beek KJ & Camargo MN 1964. Um sistema de classificação de capacidade de uso da terra para levantamento de reconhecimento de solos. DPFS/DPEA/MA/FAO, Rio de Janeiro.
5. Bibby JS Douglas HA Thomasson AJ & Robertson JS 1991. Land capability classification for agriculture. Macaulay Land Use Research Institute, Aberdeen.
6. Boulaine J 1989. Histoire des pedologues et de la science des sols. Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Paris.
7. Bouma J 1997. The land use systems approach to planning sustainable land management at several scales. ITC Journal 1997-3/4, 237-242.
8. Bouma J 1999. Land evaluation for landscape units. In: Handbook of soil science, ed ME Sumner, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, pp E393-E412.
9. Bouma J 2001a. The role of soil science in the land use negotiation process. Soil Use and Management 17, 1-6.
10. Bouma J 2001b. The new role of soil science in a network society. Soil Science 166, 874-879.
11. Dalal-Clayton B & Dent D 1993. Surveys, plans and people: a review of land resource information and its use in developing countries. The International Institute for Environment and Development, London.
12. FAO 1976. A framework for land evaluation. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.
13. FAO 1983. Guidelines: land evaluation for rainfed agriculture. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.
14. FAO 1984. Land evaluation for forestry. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.
15. FAO 1985. Guidelines: land evaluation for irrigated agriculture. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.
16. FAO 1991. Guidelines: land evaluation for extensive grazing. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.
17. FAO 1996. Our land our future: A new approach to land use planning and management. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.
18. Forbes TR Rossiter DG & Van Wambeke AR 1982. Guidelines for evaluating the adequacy of soil resource inventories. Cornell University Department of Agronomy, Ithaca, NY.
19. Helms D 1997. Land capability classification: the U.S. experience. Advances in Geoecology 159-175.
20. Klingebiel AA 1991. Development of soil survey interpretations. Soil Survey Horizons 32, 53-66.
21. Lepsch IF Bellinazzi Jr. R Bertolini D & Espíndola CR 1983. Manual para levantamento utilitário do meio físico e classificação das terras no sistema de capacidade de uso. Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo, Campinas, SP.
22. Ramalho Filho A Pereira EG & Beck KJ 1978. Sistema de avaliação da aptidão agrícola das terras. SUPLAN/MA/EMBRAPA-SNLCS, Brasília.
23. Rossiter DG 1990. ALES: A framework for land evaluation using a microcomputer. Soil Use and Management 6, 7-20.
24. Rossiter DG 1995. Economic land evaluation: why and how. Soil Use & Management 11, 132-140.
25. Rossiter DG 1996. A theoretical framework for land evaluation (with discussion). Geoderma 72, 165-202.
26. Rossiter DG & Van Wambeke AR 1997. Automated Land Evaluation System: ALES Version 4.65 User's Manual. Cornell University, Department of Soil, Crop & Atmospheric Sciences, Ithaca, NY.
27. Santa Catarina 1999. Relatório final de implementação preparado pelo mutuário por componente - Projeto Microbacias (Empréstimo 3160-BR). Estado de Santa Catarina/Secretaria de Estado do Desenvolvimento Rural e da Agricultura/Projeto Microbacias, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
28. Santos HG 1995. The Country Reports: Brazil. In: Soil survey: perspectives and strategies for the 21st century, ed JA Zinck, FAO/ITC, Rome, pp 57-63
29. Steel RGD & Torrie JH 1980. Principles and procedures of statistics: a biometrical approach. McGraw-Hill, New York.
30. Sys C Van Ranst E & Debaveye J 1991. Land evaluation, Part 1: Principles in land evaluation and crop production calculations. General Administration for Development Cooperation, Brussels.
31. Uberti AAA Bacic ILZ Panichi JAV Laus Neto JA Moser JM Pundek M & Carrião SL 1991. Metodologia para classificação da aptidão de uso das terras do Estado de Santa Catarina. EMPASC/ACARESC, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina.
32. Van Diepen CA Van Keulen H Wolf J & Berkhout JAA 1991. Land evaluation: from intuition to quantification. In: Advances In Soil Science, ed BA Stewart, Springer, New York, pp 139-204.
33. Yaalon DH & Berkowicz S (ed) 1997. History of soil science: international perspectives. Catena Verlag GMBH, Reiskirchen.
34. Zinck JA (ed) 1995. Soil survey: perspectives and strategies for the 21st century. FAO/ITC, Rome.